Hulk snap vs Thanos snap

Originally posted by 9jaboy
Well one way to know is to compare how Thanos reacted to both gauntlets which is pretty the same IIRC.

What he was trying to achieve? So the stones would read your mind in the very second you put on the gauntlet, determine what you were planning to achieve and then task you accordingly? Imagination wild much? In Endgame Thanos was trying to wipe everyone out and recreate everything and still had the same effect he had when he first wore first gauntlet in IW.

Of course the Stones read your mind, how else would they know want the user intends to do lol.

Yeah Thanos screamed both times he put the full gauntlet on. Funny how IM never did though.

Originally posted by Psychotron
So? Tony was already on his knees anyway and like I said before, he had the protection of the armor, while Hulk did not.

This is a stupid argument. You're basically saying IM's armour is giving more protection than Thanos and Hulk's strength.

And their gauntlet was made of the same damn armour, which you keep ignoring. Jeez.

Originally posted by Psychotron
No.The argument is that Hulk was visibly damaged by the stones. His arm was burned BEFORE he snapped, while Thanos was unhurt. We see Hulk's arm gets fried as soon as he puts the gauntlet on, while Thanos' arm was undamaged until after snapping.

Yes, clearly because of what Hulk was trying to achieve with the gauntlet, which is the basis of this thread.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
This is a stupid argument. You're basically saying IM's armour is giving more protection than Thanos and Hulk's strength.

And their gauntlet was made of the same damn armour, which you keep ignoring. Jeez.

Yes, clearly because of what Hulk was trying to achieve with the gauntlet, which is the basis of this thread.

No, stop twisting my words. Thanos was unhurt and Hulk surivived, while Tony died. Obviously Tony did not take it as well as the former two despite wearing armor.

So what if it was made from the same material? Hulk was only wearing a gauntlet, the rest of his arm did not have any protection. Tony only managed to wear the gauntlet in the first place because his armor took the majority of the damage. It still killed him. Absolutely nobody is claiming Iron Man was as durable as Thanos or Hulk.

This is pure speculation on your part and Endgame Thanos was trying to achieve something grander than Hulk anyway, yet he wasn't hurt when he wore the gauntlet, while Hulk was crippled.

Originally posted by Psychotron
No, stop twisting my words. Thanos was unhurt and Hulk surivived, while Tony died. Obviously Tony did not take it as well as the former two despite wearing armor.

Again this "despite wearing armour" crap.

Thanos was wearing armour. So what?

Tony did not fall to the floor screaming wielding the stones. Heck he didn't even scream like Thanos did. There's just no getting around that.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Again this "despite wearing armour" crap.

Thanos was wearing armour. So what?

Tony did not fall to the floor screaming wielding the stones. Heck he didn't even scream like Thanos did. There's just no getting around that.

Except we see visible damage on Tony's armor and Hulk's arm when they put on the the gauntlet. The energy was burning through them. It never happened to Thanos. Also, Thanos' arms were exposed, there was no armor there, so the energy went directly into him, whilist Tony's armor absorbed most of it. No matter how you try to spin it Thanos is clearly the most durable here and tanked the gauntlet, while Hulk was injured by it.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Of course the Stones read your mind, how else would they know want the user intends to do lol.

Originally posted by 9jaboy

What he was trying to achieve? So the stones would read your mind in the very second you put on the gauntlet, determine what you were planning to achieve and then task you accordingly?