How to tell a Nazi from an Antifa.

Started by Grand-Moff-Gav10 pages
Originally posted by Klaw
Ideologies aren't races.

The thing is races aren't races. They are categories, ideas constructed by minds communicating with other minds.

When one label, say Muslim, is interchangeable in one's discourse with another say, Arab, then we have to note that the 'ideological' label and 'racial' label are the same except for a single semantic point- namely that the key item being gestured towards is religion rather than ethnicity.

However, since what one says about one is true of the other that suggests the underlying sentiment towards the categories are the same- the word racist in such instances tends to take priority in discourse because that is the word usually considered most potent.

Originally posted by Klaw
But if Leftists are calling Robinson racist, I'm confident he isn't.
Exactly. That is always a safe bet to make. 😉

Discriminating based on ideology is completely okay with me.

If someone is a Communist, then they're believing in something that is abhorrent.

You can choose your ideology, and if you choose a horrible one, prepare to be discriminated against.

Originally posted by Klaw
Discriminating based on ideology is completely okay with me.

If someone is a Communist, then they're believing in something that is abhorrent.

You can choose your ideology, and if you choose a horrible one, prepare to be discriminated against.

The issue isnt what they choose. It is how the person encountering that individual chooses to interact with/interpret them.

Originally posted by Grand-Moff-Gav
The thing is races aren't races. They are categories, ideas constructed by minds communicating with other minds.

When one label, say Muslim, is interchangeable in one's discourse with another say, Arab, then we have to note that the 'ideological' label and 'racial' label are the same except for a single semantic point- namely that the key item being gestured towards is religion rather than ethnicity.

However, since what one says about one is true of the other that suggests the underlying sentiment towards the categories are the same- the word racist in such instances tends to take priority in discourse because that is the word usually considered most potent.

👆 Bingo!

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I haven't seen any real evidence of that either. Leftists never present any real proof of their racist accusations. They lie about Trump, about Alex Jones, about Tucker Carlson, even about me. Basically, everyone they don't like is a "racist" or "bigot". 😂

Like Adam Poe and his threats of "reporting".

Which is exactly why I'm not worried in the slightest, because he's essentially reporting on a straw man version of things that were never said or implied.

I never condoned white supremacy, at any point.

Of course the irony is, I would argue against one who DOES condone such as not being banned. That is a far, far cry from condoning them.

But not to Adam Poe, and his rigid sense of "justice".

On the subject of labels, Anita Sarkesian admitted she once thought everything was sexist, homophobic and racist without understanding homage, parody or cases that are actually liberating to minorities.

My favorite gaming franchise is probably Metroid, where you play as a woman in a robot suit and shoot a giant space dragon, and I’m sure we’ve all heard about Tomb Raider.

Metroid is amazing, still have to get Dread.

Even pinball was ****ing cool. 😂

Originally posted by Blakemore
he made a joke about Caitlin Jenner being woman of the year after being a woman for a year and hasn’t even had a period.

He compared it him going to a black personality awards and it saying “the no. 1 n*gger of the year… Eminem.”

Got a lot of controversy. Tbh, I thought both of those jokes were funny. Some people just don’t have a sense of humor.

Yeah I remember. Those were pretty funny.

Just sayin if anything its women who should be offended when he constantly refers to them as b****es. Thats funny once or twice, but after a while just gets insulting I would think.

Originally posted by Klaw
Ideologies aren't races.

Yeah thats a good loophole for racists.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah thats a good loophole for racists.

dur

Originally posted by Klaw
dur
yup.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
yup.

They always trot out the Race card when people talk about how horrible Islam is.

They never do it when people criticize Christianity however...

Originally posted by Klaw
They always trot out the Race card when people talk about how horrible Islam is.

They never do it when people criticize Christianity however...

This isn't really true, a lot of historic anti-Catholicism for example was nothing more than anti-Irish, anti-Italian etc., racism of American WASPs

Course not, klaw.... they have "standards", after all. As in DOUBLE STANDARDS. 😉

Are Klaw and eTheo the same person? I'm struggling to see what theyre getting out of this...

Originally posted by Grand-Moff-Gav
Are Klaw and eTheo the same person? I'm struggling to see what theyre getting out of this...

dur

Originally posted by cdtm
Like Adam Poe and his threats of "reporting".

Which is exactly why I'm not worried in the slightest, because he's essentially reporting on a straw man version of things that were never said or implied.

I never condoned white supremacy, at any point.

Of course the irony is, I would argue against one who DOES condone such as not being banned. That is a far, far cry from condoning them.

But not to Adam Poe, and his rigid sense of "justice".

Keep simping for Neo Nazis, and see how it works out for you.

Originally posted by Grand-Moff-Gav
Are Klaw and eTheo the same person? I'm struggling to see what theyre getting out of this...

they're just "pretending" to be imbeciles, so that they can enjoy the negative reactions they receive, proving (in their minds, anyway) that it's really everyone else who is foolish for even engaging them.