You can kill off a bunch of people with wars but the population will still eventually begin to grow.Hypothetically speaking,here, if there is an elite group who have decided that the best course of action is to wipe out the majority of humanity, then how would they go about it?
They wouldn't start a nuclear war because it is far too risky and could risk destroying EVERYTHING.
Asking people to not reproduce isn't going to work.
I suppose you could create a catastophic war, combined with food shortages and vaccines to kill a bunch of people in a short period of time but again that would be risky.
I think for them, the best way would be through new types of vaccinations given over a long period of time.
With this new MRNA technology that has the potential to alter DNA, God knows what they are capable of doing.
They now have the technology not only to kill off a large number of people if they want to, but also means to stop the population reproducing.
Keep manipulating people's DNA slowly over time untill you have the genetic makeup you require. They could potentially switch off the DNA sequence which allows people to reproduce.
Slowly but surely, they can then begin to control the worlds population..
People are implying that the vaccines are going to kill people off in 2 or 3 years. I think that would be too messy. Even though people are dying from the jab along with other serious side effects, I dont think that was part of the plan. If you want to coerce a population into having an experimental jab, you can't have people dying left right and centre. Better to slowly exterminate humanity over time then be so reckless and do it over a short period of time