Boris Johnson

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
It's all about class and wealth for Tories, Rich Muslims, Rich Christian and Republicans. None of these people want anything which affects their control.

Milo Yanni, Gabbard, Badenoch, Tim Pool all cut from the same cloth. If it gets them on shitting on their own... it gets them on.

These are the top 15 countries for GDP:

United States: $20.89 trillion
China: $14.72 trillion
Japan: $5.06 trillion
Germany: $3.85 trillion
United Kingdom: $2.67 trillion
India: $2.66 trillion
France: $2.63 trillion
Italy: $1.89 trillion
Canada: $1.64 trillion
South Korea: $1.63 trillion
Russia: $1.48 trillion
Brazil: $1.44 trillion
Australia: $1.32 trillion
Spain: $1.28 trillion
Indonesia: $1.05 trillion

https://globalpeoservices.com/top-15-countries-by-gdp-in-2022/

The locations are pretty interesting. India, Indonesia and Australia in the Indian Ocean, China, Korea, Japan, Russia, Canada, U.S.A and Mexico in the north Pacific Ocean, and Britain, Spain, Italy, France and Germany in Europe. (Okay, we left Europe and Russia's being a dick, but these are the strong economies now.

I know I haven't mentioned Africa, but we have to move on from our colonial past.

Yes, I'm sure a lot of Brexiteers probably wanted cheap choc ices from Kenyan labour and hate the Belgian chocolate magnum because it's just a choc ice on a stick. Using that anecdote as a metaphor for a lot of the "good old days" and I understand your gripe with the Conservatives and rich minority conservatives but we don't live in a world of viceroys anymore.

Whenever we have these discussions about global trade Whirly, I keep asking you, what is the alternative?

Originally posted by Blakemore
Alright, I understand what you're saying. She's an elitist and you obviously don't like that. I mean, I get it, but I don't know how we can have an alternative other than a full revolution.

These are the top 15 countries for GDP:

United States: $20.89 trillion
China: $14.72 trillion
Japan: $5.06 trillion
Germany: $3.85 trillion
United Kingdom: $2.67 trillion
India: $2.66 trillion
France: $2.63 trillion
Italy: $1.89 trillion
Canada: $1.64 trillion
South Korea: $1.63 trillion
Russia: $1.48 trillion
Brazil: $1.44 trillion
Australia: $1.32 trillion
Spain: $1.28 trillion
Indonesia: $1.05 trillion

https://globalpeoservices.com/top-15-countries-by-gdp-in-2022/

The locations are pretty interesting. India, Indonesia and Australia in the Indian Ocean, China, Korea, Japan, Russia, Canada, U.S.A and Mexico in the north Pacific Ocean, and Britain, Spain, Italy, France and Germany in Europe. (Okay, we left Europe and Russia's being a dick, but these are the strong economies now.

I know I haven't mentioned Africa, but we have to move on from our colonial past.

Yes, I'm sure a lot of Brexiteers probably wanted cheap choc ices from Kenyan labour and hate the Belgian chocolate magnum because it's just a choc ice on a stick. Using that anecdote as a metaphor for a lot of the "good old days" and I understand your gripe with the Conservatives and rich minority conservatives but we don't live in a world of viceroys anymore.

Whenever we have these discussions about global trade Whirly, I keep asking you, what is the alternative?

Tory UK will be similar... did you now food banks have increased by 1172% since the Tories came to power. We have 1172 now. We had none before and a working benefits system.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Nigeria keep the poor so poor most don't have electricity. There's not enough Oil money for all but there's enough for some to live very well. Nigeria has the highest level of poverty per capita in the world. It also has the most billionaires in Africa.

Tory UK will be similar... did you now food banks have increased by 1172% since the Tories came to power. We have 1172 now. We had none before and a working benefits system.

As for Nigeria, could greater relations with the U.K. improve Nigerian society?

#inb4 not with the Tories in power lol

YouTube video

More on Bradenoch.

Originally posted by Blakemore
YouTube video

More on Bradenoch.

Originally posted by Blakemore
The argument regarding food banks is they weren't classed as food banks before. Then again, that is an alarming statistic. Can you back that up?

As for Nigeria, could greater relations with the U.K. improve Nigerian society?

#inb4 not with the Tories in power lol

My the way it's a 117200% increase as each 1 of the 1172 is a 100% increase on zero.

Originally posted by Blakemore
The argument regarding food banks is they weren't classed as food banks before. Then again, that is an alarming statistic. Can you back that up?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
No, lol. You google it.

Originally posted by Blakemore
As for Nigeria, could greater relations with the U.K. improve Nigerian society?

#inb4 not with the Tories in power lol

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
. Haha, most colonial countries are happy with relations how they are and run by elites until the next revolution, where they usually survive because its a family relative in one of the wealthy families who is usually the senior ranking officer revolting. He'll then either bring back "democracy" through his and the other wealthy families after committing atrocities for ten years as shithole nations nth republic, or reign till he is 80 as God Emperor of shit hole country. It is what it is.

Originally posted by Blakemore
My the way it's a 117200% increase as each 1 of the 1172 is a 100% increase on zero.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Horrible

I'm disappointed in you. ❌

There's something else that bothers me. Why don't you think she'll win a general election?

mmm

Ad hominems aside, why don't I think she can win a general election? A lot of British people voted for Brexit and the others will see straight through her.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Horrible

She's right though. The UK is a country of low expectations. Why else would we be considering her as fit to be Prime Minister?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
She's right though. The UK is a country of low expectations. Why else would we be considering her as fit to be Prime Minister?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Ad hominems aside, why don't I think she can win a general election? A lot of British people voted for Brexit and the others will see straight through her.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
She's right though. The UK is a country of low expectations. Why else would we be considering her as fit to be Prime Minister?

YouTube video "It is on record." 😆

mmm

Originally posted by Blakemore
She's a Brexiteer, Whirly.

Originally posted by Blakemore

The dross of Cameron, May and Johnson? 2 of the candidates were in the front bench and another candidate was Jeremy Hunt?

To be fair she is more of a British Candice Owens than Gabbard. Spouting to daily mail readers "I'm one of the good ones".

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
✅ read back

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Jaden already answered this.

To be fair she is more of a British Candice Owens than Gabbard. Spouting to daily mail readers "I'm one of the good ones".

Oh, I just realised. When you said ad hominems aside, you were referring to me, not yourself restraining from attacking me. Then again, you did refer to Badenoch as a British Tulsi Gabbard and then went as far as comparing her to Candace Owens! 😆

Was it the "don't know shit about black people?"

Originally posted by Blakemore
She's a Brexiteer, Whirly.

The dross of Cameron, May and Johnson? 2 of the candidates were in the front bench and another candidate was Jeremy Hunt?

So more of the same. She thinks profits should come before the environment. She thinks profits should come before company ethics. She wants to cut taxes to cut spending. If she thinks company profits are such a priority which taxes do you think she'll cut? Your income tax or national insurance or your fuel taxes? Or do you think she'll cut corporation tax, capital gains taxes?

And what do you think she'll cut in public spending to pay for it?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
So more of the same. She thinks profits should come before the environment. She thinks profits should come before company ethics. She wants to cut taxes to cut spending. If she thinks company profits are such a priority which taxes do you think she'll cut? Your income tax or national insurance or your fuel taxes? Or do you think she'll cut corporation tax, capital gains taxes?

And what do you think she'll cut in public spending to pay for it?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
So more of the same. She thinks profits should come before the environment. She thinks profits should come before company ethics. She wants to cut taxes to cut spending. If she thinks company profits are such a priority which taxes do you think she'll cut? Your income tax or national insurance or your fuel taxes? Or do you think she'll cut corporation tax, capital gains taxes?

And what do you think she'll cut in public spending to pay for it?