Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!Nah, sorry. If I reply to cd I usually reply to a specific part of the post, because his posts always spiral from individual points to disconnected mania. The quote function lets me avoid engaging the bulk of the blather.
Got to ask you Smurph, please as a favour avoid reposting Cdtm in reply. I have his banality on ignore and really have no wish to see it.
But I'm happy to quit this particular convo here.
Originally posted by Smurphthanks mate.
Nah, sorry. If I reply to cd I usually reply to a specific part of the post, because his posts always spiral from individual points to disconnected mania. The quote function lets me avoid engaging the bulk of the blather.But I'm happy to quit this particular convo here.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg😂
it's pointless whirly. everyone is too eager to prove that they're smarter than the village retard
"Tesla Has Lost $250 Billion in Market Cap Since Elon Musk Took Over Twitter"
😂
"Elon Musk has lost his crown as the world's richest person, after further falls in the value of shares in his electric car company Tesla."
😂
"Elon Musk Says He Will Step Down As Twitter CEO—After He Finds ‘Someone Foolish Enough’ To Take Over"
😂
Originally posted by Smurph
I wonder how he ordered his soldiers though?Do you think.... is it possible that he used words?
Look, I am as crystal clear as I can be on my beliefs.
How about returning the favor and telling me what you axruall believe?
Here's a good starting point; what does the misquote mean to you (Voltaire never said it)
"I despite what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it."
What limits should exist, how should these limits avoid slippery slope/mission creep, ect ect.
I'm assuming you're not a straight statist and do have nuance in your views?
One last thing;
Whirly said he believes some people need to be protected from certain information. He was not more detailed then this.
Do you agree with him? Do you think some people simply shouldn't be exposed to world views, as opposed to the common view of centrists that every person is presumed as capable of handling themselves with whatever they find? Trusting in the individual, as you trust your own judgement?
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Got to ask you Smurph, please as a favour avoid reposting Cdtm in reply. I have his banality on ignore and really have no wish to see it.
Whirly, SHUT THE **** UP.
This is harassment, and I am reporting you for it. You are not a mod, you have no right to continually harass and condescend like this.
Reported.
Originally posted by Smurph
Nah, sorry. If I reply to cd I usually reply to a specific part of the post, because his posts always spiral from individual points to disconnected mania. The quote function lets me avoid engaging the bulk of the blather.But I'm happy to quit this particular convo here.
Banality isn't even an accurate term. You know what is banal?
Originally posted by Smurph
I wonder how he ordered his soldiers though?Do you think.... is it possible that he used words?
Bringing in Nazi's or Hitler to justify censorship.
Nothing more predictable or boring. Or wrong.
Originally posted by cdtmWow, reporting Whirly so he shuts up? Suddenly so keen to stifle his speech hey
Whirly, [b]SHUT THE **** UP.This is harassment, and I am reporting you for it. You are not a mod, you have no right to continually harass and condescend like this.
Reported. [/B]
I get it though, you feel like his posts are harassing and condescending. And yet....
Originally posted by cdtm
Words only hurt if you let them.
Originally posted by Jaden_3.0
It wasn't to justify censorship. It was to show how stupid your idea that incitement isn't a thing is.
I see.
Well, the thing is Hitlers words wouldn't have amounted to much without the actual power to run the national interests. So lets say you're 100% right, then what? Do we censor politicians on the stump?
And there was a lot more at play then just his racist speeches, like the economy leading to a disgruntled receptive to a boogyman. IMO The Nazi thing has too many factors to say "See? Speech needs to be controlled".
hi, is this the line where everyone stands in to wait their turn to obediently engage and validate ctdm's every shitpost? you know, where everyone pretends to want to rescue the general conversation, but are actually helping an obvious bad faith piece of garbage destroy EVERY conversation. is this that line, because it sure looks like it
Originally posted by Bashar Tegif you flip through the last few pages, it looks like the convo has been carrying on but for your many, many posts complaining about cdtm.
hi, is this the line where everyone stands in to wait their turn to obediently engage and validate ctdm's every shitpost? you know, where everyone pretends to want to rescue the general conversation, but are actually helping an obvious bad faith piece of garbage destroy EVERY conversation. is this that line, because it sure looks like it
So I guess the bad faith poster trying to derail the conversation... is you.