Stoic, answer this question. What does this statement mean? No man of steel is beating Supreme. In other words, Image said without opposition, that Superman CANNOT beat Supreme. Point blank. Now you have flies buzzing around wanting proof when it's right in their face. Just swat them away for they know nothing. The reason that Supreme and Superman never fought was because DC backed down because they knew superman would lose. That's why Image Comics took it upon themselves to make that Statement directed at Superman and DC comics. So who did they go after next?? Kallark, now where did the name Kallark come from? Kal and Clark. Now Marvels Gladiator unlike Superman can get stronger the more confident he is, So Supreme was not going to run over Gladiator like he would have Superman. Wait? I just said that gladiator gets stronger and more powerful the more confident he is. Now of course certain idiots on here will beg for proof. Yet. If they were smart enough, they would look at that fight between Gladiator and Supreme and get all the proof they need. But unfortunately, them being idiots, they lack the ability to see or understand how to obtain that information. I want you to read that book, read it slowly and carefully, make mental notes of what the characters are saying and what actions they take immediately after. Pay close attention to the changing mindset of both characters. Don't be like these superman fans who would see pictures of a man beating a polar bear and then go around bragging about the man beating that bear while failing to understand that the bear was drugged, de-clawed, teeth ripped out and nearly 100 years old.