Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I've already gone over why I think that latter belief is ridiculous so I won't harp on it. My concern is this:You do not love a foetus like you love a wife or a girlfriend, to a different degree- a mother either.
There are many ways I could go into just how illogical and irrational I find that belief to be, but I have another question:
WHY would you choose the foetus over the female? Because it has the right to life? What about the woman who is already there, already living, already with people who love her? You would kill her to save a foetus whilst making yourself and many others, family included, depressed and traumatised? You're obviously not concerned with anyone but yourself. No foetus is worth that, none.
My original question too, if you don't mind:
Let's say the woman asked you; "Let me live, kill the foetus". What would you say? Would you comply, or would you not? If you had the power to choose. You previously said that a woman would be selfish for asking for this. So I'm guessing that not only would you call your loved one selfish for wanting to live, but not deserving to be a mother anyway?
I think your logic is disturbingly warped, to degrees unseen since another member I could name. Not meant as an insult.
-AC
Still, during the months of Pregnancy, the soon to be parents develop a type of bond with the unborn child and grows to love it in a way.
I wouldn't consider myself selfish. I'm only fighting for the child's right to live, even if the mother must die, b/c the child should come first.
Although I would think that my wife should sacrifice herself for our baby, I would comply with her wishes and let her live, b/c although I believe the baby should live over her, who am I to tell her no, you must die to let your baby live. I have no right. You say I have the choice though, so considering what she wants, I would choose to let her live b/c that's what she wants.
is it comprehensible.....