Originally posted by AllianceAgreed.
A fetus at the stage where people have abortions has more in common with a soccerball than a human.And if you are afraid of "feminists" you got issues. Femenist wer considered evil in the 1960's during the rise of the conservative totalitarian facist regimes in the US.
Originally posted by Alliance
A fetus at the stage where people have abortions has more in common with a soccerball than a human.And if you are afraid of "feminists" you got issues. Femenist wer considered evil in the 1960's during the rise of the conservative totalitarian facist regimes in the US.
actually the term he used was "feminazi"😆 (it'd be funny if it wasn't so horrible and twisted and.. you know maybe it just wouldn't be funny at all no matter what. foget i said that. anywho...). i can't help but notice Nogoodnamesleft has posted anything since. why is that?
Originally posted by Rapscallionnogoodnamesleft has left because we saw he was Whob.
actually the term he used was "feminazi"😆 (it'd be funny if it wasn't so horrible and twisted and.. you know maybe it just wouldn't be funny). i can't help but notice Nogoodnamesleft has posted anything since. why is that?
Oh, there is no right or wrong answer. It doesn't matter what a foetus has more in common with, it IS a human, and even if people object to war so much, then think about this. War = people killing people. Abortion = people killing babies. When it's put like that, which sounds worse? I am firmly against war and abortion. But aborton is the topic, so I'm going to stick with that.
When you have an abortion, you destroy a child. You destroy their right to grow up, speak their first word, take their first step. You stop them falling in love, getting married, having their own kids, watching them grow old, and of course, the inevitable, death. Could anyone actually live with knowing that they'd killed a child?
Even if there are those circumstances that make people want to have an abortion, like financial conditions, marital status, anything else. There is NO excuse for murder. Because that's what it is. Murder.
Originally posted by Saphira
Oh, there is no right or wrong answer. It doesn't matter what a foetus has more in common with, it IS a human, and even if people object to war so much, then think about this. War = people killing people. Abortion = people killing babies. When it's put like that, which sounds worse? I am firmly against war and abortion. But aborton is the topic, so I'm going to stick with that.
When you have an abortion, you destroy a child. You destroy their right to grow up, speak their first word, take their first step. You stop them falling in love, getting married, having their own kids, watching them grow old, and of course, the inevitable, death. Could anyone actually live with knowing that they'd killed a child?
Even if there are those circumstances that make people want to have an abortion, like financial conditions, marital status, anything else. There is NO excuse for murder. Because that's what it is. Murder.
Besides it totally not being murder I also disagree on all the other "points" of your post.
Originally posted by Saphira
Oh, there is no right or wrong answer. It doesn't matter what a foetus has more in common with, it IS a human, and even if people object to war so much, then think about this. War = people killing people. Abortion = people killing babies. When it's put like that, which sounds worse? I am firmly against war and abortion. But aborton is the topic, so I'm going to stick with that.
When you have an abortion, you destroy a child. You destroy their right to grow up, speak their first word, take their first step. You stop them falling in love, getting married, having their own kids, watching them grow old, and of course, the inevitable, death. Could anyone actually live with knowing that they'd killed a child?
Even if there are those circumstances that make people want to have an abortion, like financial conditions, marital status, anything else. There is NO excuse for murder. Because that's what it is. Murder.
Also, a fetus does not have a right to anything you just mentioned.
Originally posted by Saphira
Oh, there is no right or wrong answer. It doesn't matter what a foetus has more in common with, it IS a human, and even if people object to war so much, then think about this. War = people killing people. Abortion = people killing babies.
actually whether or not a fetus is a human is a matter of religion. for example certain protestants believe that a baby comes into being during conception. fews believe that life begins at birth. (not sure where any others stand and can't find the article where i found it. ouch! there goes my argument ) therefore if the government were to make abortion illegal they would be mixing church and stte which violates one of our nation's most important ideals. scientifically, fetuses when aborted tend to be in a stage where they lack almost all the physical and psychological aspects that define us as human beings. physically they aren't developed enough to bare the traits of people, and they don't have the mental capabilities that babies have.
oh and your analogy was bad too
Originally posted by Nogoodnamesleft
I should also note how it's very conspicuous that if a woman killed her children after they were born, it would be considered murder, yet all of a sudden it's alright just because the kids aren't born yet.
But you should also note that whether you don't get it or not, that's exactly how it is.
-AC
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
i am neither prolife or prochoice. i think that if a woman is pregnant she should have it. unless one of the following come into play:
1. she will/might die at childbirth
2. the child is the result of a rape
3. the child will be a crack baby, or deformed in some way
Can you explain the logic behind the second one?