Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
What about giving your baby to a couple who has no children?That would be better for the baby to live then die!jm 🙂
I doubt many people will be willing to adopt a baby with Hydrocephaly, who will die just minutes after birth. Not many people are at all willing to adopt Down's children, eithor.
Originally posted by Nichole
I doubt many people will be willing to adopt a baby with Hydrocephaly, who will die just minutes after birth. Not many people are at all willing to adopt Down's children, eithor.
Though most likely true, I do not think there is a massive hydrocephaly or Downs syndrome birth rate going on, so those two can't be logically used to discredit abortion possibilities.
Originally posted by RobtardI don't know about hydrocephaly but Down's has a prevalence of about 1/1000 live births, the incidence is about four times higher by my recollection.
Though most likely true, I do not think there is a massive hydrocephaly or Downs syndrome birth rate going on, so those two can't be logically used to discredit abortion possibilities.
Originally posted by RobtardJackie Malfoy is/was either a complete and utter retard or a social psychologist writing a thesis on the behaviour in internet forums when complete and utter retards are introduced into scenarios, depending on how intelligent and/or devious you think a social psychologist can be.
Who is Jackie Malfoy and why is she(?) such a big deal?
Personally, I am pro-choice. To balance this, however, I feel an abortion should not be an easy thing to be granted. If you say no in all cases, it takes an act of congress to make an exception, or a black market doctor.
To have an abortion, one should have -
1) a medical emergency defined by a Doctor
2) Unusual circumstances surrounding the pregnancy (rape, incest)
Those circumstances should be instantly given a choice...
If those conditions are not met, then to get one the woman would have to have
1) a mandatory medical examination to verify the trimester and condition of the child
2) Mandatory counseling on the options if the reason for wanting an abortion is fear of caring for the child or not wanting to take care of it. In which, options should be discussed like adoption, etc.
If, after that, the woman still wants the abortion-
1) Her name and info should go in a registry. I would say allow only one abortion not due to medical emergency or rape/incest in a lifetime
2) The woman and her partner's name(verified by DNA, perhaps) should be posted in the paper in a section like Obituaries, Births, etc. This would help curb wanting the abortion just because the would be father was already married and slept around.
3) Both the woman and her partner would have to take a class on birth control lasting one hour per night for six weeks, or serve jail time. The point here is trying to prevent getting into the same situation again.
The above three penalties, if you would call them such, should only be if the very first two scenarios were not met and this was simply done because they didn't want the child.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I don't know about hydrocephaly but Down's has a prevalence of about 1/1000 live births, the incidence is about four times higher by my recollection.JackieMalfoy is/was either a complete and utter retard or a social psychologist writing a thesis on the behaviour in internet forums when complete and utter retards are introduced into scenarios, depending on how intelligent and/or devious you think a social psychologist can be.
1/1000 is still fairly rare, I am just saying that adoption is a viable outlet to abortion if the woman is willing to put herself through the pains of labor and shouldn't be discredited due to the chance of birth defects.
Intriguing with the Malfoy Incident, I'm sorry I missed her then, it sounds rather interesting the way you put it.
Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
You threw that way out of proportion. There is a fact that the Baby is actually there, being created, what you stated were things that had not yet been done, therefore nothing to do with the subject.Don't kill Babies, if you get an Abortion it's ONLY under EXTREME circumstances
This is the thing here. Is the unborn a person? How is it so?
Originally posted by crazylozer
This is the thing here. Is the unborn a person? How is it so?
Yes I am back.Actly alot of people would have a child who has something wrong with them.I don't see why they would not.Not wanting one is alittle selfish and uncaring.
I am no big deal just some people don't like my points of views.Like I don't like theres.But hey it is my point of beliefs so that is fine if they don't like it.jm 🙂
Originally posted by Velkyn
The woman and her partner's name(verified by DNA, perhaps) should be posted in the paper in a section like Obituaries, Births, etc. 3)Both the woman and her partner would have to take a class on birth control lasting one hour per night for six weeks, or serve jail time. The point here is trying to prevent getting into the same situation again.
I love the fact that you claim to be pro-choice, yet want to send women to prison simply for exorcising their rights. 🙄
This JM copycat is still posting? How many more reasons do we need here? *sigh*
A few more:
1) If you really want people to know that "Jackie Malfoy" is back (as so prominently stated in the status), why not just use the Jackie Malfoy ID and change the username? Why go all out and use one created in 2003? I know she's dumb, but that's dumbness on an unattainable plane.
2) Those "Friends on KMC" was copied and pasted from one of JM's old posts. For someone with 140 career posts, they make no sense. Aku? He's been gone for years! Slipknot? Banned in 2005!
This is just someone (hmmm, not many choices, do we?) trying to stir the pot again by actually using a famous previous user and attacking with the strategy of dumbness. Shame on anyone who thinks otherwise, and who also thinks JM knows how to use the 'quote' function!!
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
Yes I am back.Actly alot of people would have a child who has something wrong with them.I don't see why they would not.Not wanting one is alittle selfish and uncaring.
I am no big deal just some people don't like my points of views.Like I don't like theres.But hey it is my point of beliefs so that is fine if they don't like it.jm 🙂
If I don't want children, that makes me selfish ?
Originally posted by Nichole
I thought you said you were pro-choice? If so, you wouldn't want women to go to prison for aborting a baby.
I am prolife not proabortion which is the correct word that means prochoice.If abortion was outlawed and woman did go to jail for having killing a baby that would be fine with me .
Other people go to jail for murdering people it is the same for a unborn baby who is in fact human just like us.A person is a person no matter small or strange looking.jm 🙂
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
I am prolife not proabortion which is the correct word that means prochoice.If abortion was outlawed and woman did go to jail for having killing a baby that would be fine with me .
Other people go to jail for murdering people it is the same for a unborn baby who is in fact human just like us.A person is a person no matter small or strange looking.jm 🙂
Good point, how old are you by the way ?