Originally posted by redcaped
What kind of reply is that and why?
The What... It was an @ssholes reply. You have been spamming the threads with nothing more than half senseless one liners or just posting smilies for the last day or two.
The Why... You said yourself "but the intention is make you create your own version from my ideas" so I decided that by you saying "I abort every day" it meant masturbation habits. So stop crying.
Originally posted by redcaped
I have the freedom to post my way expressively. I didn't mention the word masturbation, but is interesting how members like you follow everything I've said in the past.
Don't let it go to your head champ, you said it about 8 post up... I may not be a genius, but remembering something I read today isn't that hard.
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
What about giving your baby to a couple who has no children?That would be better for the baby to live then die!jm 🙂
Why don't you sell your belongings and donate it to a charity for starving African people? The world isn't perfect, and it won't be for a while. Instead of forcing people to make more and more people, why not focus on saving people already living?
For Abortion
A women wants to get rid of a baby it's her business and up to her.
I don't care about the 'what ifs' or how it's 'murder' bullshit. Until it can accurately be stated as a life-form and not a mish-mash of half formed organs and cells then it can be flushed down the toilet with as much ease as so much feces.
When I say we I intent to express my collaboration by posting...honestly nothing more I can do. US is facing multiple problems, first their problems then help others. But it is important to state that the only way to solve each one of them is by doing so not debating or planning, which dilates the situation. Am I right? I only hear the news but nothing done so far.
Originally posted by crazylozer
Why don't you sell your belongings and donate it to a charity for starving African people? The world isn't perfect, and it won't be for a while. Instead of forcing people to make more and more people, why not focus on saving people already living?
No one is forcing anyone to have children.If they have children that is there thing but why kill a baby just because you made the mistake?Should the baby pay for being born?How is it there fault that there mom got herself pregent?It is not it is the mom or whatever.
My point is why should the unborn pay for something that they did not do?jm
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
No one is forcing anyone to have children.If they have children that is there thing but why kill a baby just because you made the mistake?Should the baby pay for being born?How is it there fault that there mom got herself pregent?It is not it is the mom or whatever.
My point is why should the unborn pay for something that they did not do?jm
This is the thing here. Is the unborn a person? How is it so?
If it's not, and it's an unborn child, then we get into the potentiality slippery slope. (Oh boy I've said this too many times.)
Dealing in what "will be" is a foolish way to go about things. That homeless person "could have" invented a cure for cancer if he applied himself in school. Is he a killer through negligence? Are the people who discouraged him accomplices? Or how about people who die alone. They could have made kids with other people. Did they kill all their future children (their eggs/sperm) when they failed to get intimate with another? Dealing in potentialities means that in essence, you will force people to have children, thousands of them.
Originally posted by crazylozer
This is the thing here. Is the unborn a person? How is it so?If it's not, and it's an unborn child, then we get into the potentiality slippery slope. (Oh boy I've said this too many times.)
Dealing in what "will be" is a foolish way to go about things. That homeless person "could have" invented a cure for cancer if he applied himself in school. Is he a killer through negligence? Are the people who discouraged him accomplices? Or how about people who die alone. They could have made kids with other people. Did they kill all their future children (their eggs/sperm) when they failed to get intimate with another? Dealing in potentialities means that in essence, you will force people to have children, thousands of them.
You threw that way out of proportion. There is a fact that the Baby is actually there, being created, what you stated were things that had not yet been done, therefore nothing to do with the subject.
Don't kill Babies, if you get an Abortion it's ONLY under EXTREME circumstances