Abortion

Started by Kelly_Bean787 pages

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
You just said you'd love her and that's all that matters, suggesting unconditional love. But, you share her opinions; which include the willingness to cut off ties with family and friends, for doing something she doesn't like.

I'm sorry you take the subject of "unconditional" love over an internet forum so heavily.
Originally posted by WickedTexasMomA
hugAgree'd

😍

Say your dad raped and killed your sister, if you don't have a sister you can borrow one of mine, Would you still LOVE your father and support him no matter what? OR Would you be disgusted and turn away from him?

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
I'm sorry you take the subject of "unconditional" love over an internet forum so heavily.
😍

Got any mates that have had abortions?

Originally posted by WickedTexasMomA
Say your dad raped and killed your sister, if you don't have a sister you can borrow one of mine, Would you still LOVE your father and support him no matter what? OR Would you be disgusted and turn away from him?

That's completely flawed.

But, out of interest why raped as well? Doctors don't have sex with foetuses you know.

I think babies are wonderful. I can understand why some people might want to abort one for certain reasons, though I would feel that adoption would be much better. However, I'm not in their shoes. Only they can decide what is right for themselves. To use it as a form of birth control is hideous, which I've known some people to do.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Got any mates that have had abortions?

That's completely flawed.

But, out of interest why raped as well? Doctors don't have sex with foetuses you know.

Because abortion is a violation of the womb.

Originally posted by WickedTexasMomA
Because abortion is a violation of the womb.

In your opinion.

If it's a violation of the womb to you, keep it out of the only womb that's your concern; yours.

-AC

Originally posted by WickedTexasMomA
Because abortion is a violation of the womb.

Right, yeah of course it is. Even though it's done with the woman's full consent?

Your daftness is beginning to wind me up.

Well, she's defending the baby. I can understand that. I wuv them too.

Wait, wait, wait.

"Ban stupid people, not dogs.".

Why? Would it be because dogs are not to blame for the stupidity of the way the right to own them is used? Why should you, a very caring dog owner, suffer because an idiot had one?

Reminds me of something.

Ban stupid people, not abortions.

-AC

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Got any mates that have had abortions?

That's completely flawed.

But, out of interest why raped as well? Doctors don't have sex with foetuses you know.


No, thank God.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Well, she's defending the baby. I can understand that. I wuv them too.

What baby? She can talk all she wants about babies, but that's not the topic. I'm talking about foetuses.

They're the same thing in my opinion.

Originally posted by debbiejo
They're the same thing in my opinion.

Scientifically speaking, your opinion is wrong.
Don't get angry, I'm all for you holding such opinions, perhaps you believe in dragons and the like, I don't really care. I'd just rather you didn't enter a serious discussion and spout it.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Scientifically speaking, your opinion is wrong.
Don't get angry, I'm all for you holding such opinions, perhaps you believe in dragons and the like, I don't really care. I'd just rather you didn't enter a serious discussion and spout it.
I came right in here and stated that it was an opinion. I never said it was the scientific usage of words. They're only words.

Debbie don't waste your typing on Chill and AC, there of the same soul, What ever you might say will just "aggro" them on.

Originally posted by 2D_MASTER
How's the wife doing?

Well.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Actually I'm not, I'm waiting to see how long you're allowed to constantly troll the forums abusing people without contributing a shred to debate.

He does have a role, I guess...

"Evil Clown is very quick with a joke, but his jests always have a barb. He has little patience for in-depth discussions and will often disrupt exchanges between serious forum participants by introducing irrelevant topics, fatuous quips, and offhand comments. His greatest thrill is to taunt and humiliate weaker or more plodding Warriors with his snappy ripostes. Not a particularly powerful Warrior, Evil Clown will attempt to avoid defeat by accusing his attacker of having no sense of humor."

*Cue's circus music*

Debbie don't waste your typing on Chill and AC, there of the same soul, What ever you might say will just "aggro" them on.

Been there, done that.

Originally posted by debbiejo
I came right in here and stated that it was an opinion. I never said it was the scientific usage of words. They're only words.

What do you mean, ''They're only words''? This is an internet discussion board, words are what you contribute.

Now, if you feel that you can enter a discussion, which is debating abortion and make a claim that science proves is wrong; I'm going to call you up on it, using words.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Now, if you feel that you can enter a discussion, which is debating abortion and make a claim that science proves is wrong; I'm going to call you up on it, using words.

An arbitrary definition can't be used as proof.

Did you read my first post? I am for the right to choose. I also stated that the words can be changed, but it still doesn't change what it REALLY is. Call it an apple if you like, it's still a human.