Saitama runs the marvel hardcore gauntlet

Started by Smurph43 pages

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Lol...you boys really got to stop moving goal posts and just concede when your wrong. It'll make a man out of you.
should just put this quote in the rules thread

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Where did I say officially released?

As I have said many times (😂 ) please read my posts carefully. Twice, of you have to.

This is hilarious. Not to mention, I thought you've read past issue 169?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Just remembered this thread. Latest OPM is out.....guess Garou explicitly states he's not at his full level and needs to undergo the same fights in order to reawaken his power.

Heh.

Then I posted

Originally posted by h1a8
I just read the issue that was released 17aug2022
I don't recall reading that. Can you post a scan?

I was transparent and told you the exact issue I read. Then You started to act stupid and play games with

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Try reading it again....

Why would you want me to read the last officially released issue again, knowing what you are talking is not in there? Other than to Troll?

You could have clearly stated that issue isnt officially released and just posted the scan.
Or just tell me it isn't in that issue but a possible upcoming one.

Obviously I stated I don't have access to this unreleased issue multiple times, as I made effort to locate it.
Maybe some secret site smuggling out comics before they are released?

Originally posted by h1a8
Have you been reading the exchanges?
I stated multiple times that the last officially released issue is 167
AND I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY GOT THEY HANDS ON AN ISSUE THAT ISN'T RELEASED YET. So the argument wasn't that it never occurred in any issue but the last released issue. I can't find this unreleased issue, whether for purchase or by googling.

It's not just you. Carver took the "completely misinterpreting what is blatantly said" route. You not being able to find something on Google doesn't make you right or Saint wrong. Especially when you made it seem as though you've read the issue....twice. Next time just say "hey, I haven't seen that yet. Can you send me a link so I can catch up?"

Originally posted by h1a8
What low showings? There are no low showings after chapter 169
Saitama always holds back. Do you have proof he gave something all his might and it was significantly lower than alt Saitama?

Interesting.

😂

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I think h1 lied when he said he read the latest chapter twice. Until he proves he did, he's a liar 😂

No proof whatsoever that he's read it even once, tbh.

Find me a single comic or a movie that h1 has read/watched during his entire KMC career.

You'd have an easier time proving that Moon Knight's butler could murder Justice League.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Interesting.
What part was false or interesting?
I thought 169 was latest issue a while back. One site has issue numbers wrong.
Doesn't matter since we know last issue is when Genos tries to tell Saitama what happened and how he saved everyone.

So you agree to trolling

Guess. Which part did I emphasize?

Originally posted by Sin I AM
It's not just you. Carver took the "completely misinterpreting what is blatantly said" route. You not being able to find something on Google doesn't make you right or Saint wrong. Especially when you made it seem as though you've read the issue....twice. Next time just say "hey, I haven't seen that yet. Can you send me a link so I can catch up?"
I specifically explaines WHICH ISSUE I READ. Saint trolled and said,"read it again" KNOWING it's the wrong issue. It's bias of you not to clearly see him trolling and is wrong.

No where in Google can you find the unreleased issue.
Type one punch man 168 or one punch man issues
and I guarantee you can't find it.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Guess. Which part did I emphasize?

Psychology huh?
Basically ignored the fact you trolled by changing the subject.

Note: I SPECIFICALLY addressed the part you underlined. Are you stupid or something?

Originally posted by h1a8
I specifically explaines WHICH ISSUE I READ. Saint trolled and said,"read it again" KNOWING it's the wrong issue. It's bias of you not to clearly see him trolling and is wrong.

No where in Google can you find the unreleased issue.
Type one punch man 168 or one punch man issues
and I guarantee you can't find it.

Somehow, Sin, ODG, qwerty, Deadpool, I, even Carv managed to read it (I admittedly assume Carv read it as he had an opinion on it).

Yet, somehow, you couldn't find it. Nowhere did I specify the issue number, but I did have a ton of fun at your expense, with the surety of your statements.

And at the end of the day, is that not what this forum is for? To have some fun?

Originally posted by h1a8
Psychology huh?
Basically ignored the fact you trolled by changing the subject.

Note: I SPECIFICALLY addressed the part you underlined. Are you stupid or something?


I trolled? Huh. If I did so, report me, otherwise, sit back down 😂

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Somehow, Sin, ODG, qwerty, Deadpool, I, even Carv managed to read it (I admittedly assume Carv read it as he had an opinion on it).

Yet, somehow, you couldn't find it. Nowhere did I specify the issue number, but I did have a ton of fun at your expense, with the surety of your statements.

And at the end of the day, is that not what this forum is for? To have some fun?

Several people managing to get their hands on it has nothing to with my point (it's not officially released). Either they all have reading comprehension problems (since I stated which issue I read and that the upcoming one isn't released yet) or they trolling too.
Changing the subject, goalposts, is not going to distract from that.

You didn't want to say that it isn't officially released because you knew it wouldn't count as evidence (but no one was arguing about anything).

Originally posted by h1a8
Several people managing to get their hands on it has nothing to with my point (it's not officially released). Either they all have reading comprehension problems (since I stated which issue I read and that the upcoming one isn't released yet) or they trolling too.
Changing the subject, goalposts, is not going to distract from that.

You didn't want to say that it isn't officially released because you knew it wouldn't count as evidence (but no one was arguing about anything).

My point was that I never used the word official. I never gave issue numbers.

You kept banging on like you and you alone were the authority. That I was lying. Without even giving me a chance to clarify.

So yeah, please stop chiming in with an opinion on something you know nothing about 😂

My post still stands. Latest issue is out, and in it, Garou explains he etc etc etc.

H1, come back when you've read it and can discuss it with those who have.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
My point was that I never used the word official. I never gave issue numbers.

You kept banging on like you and you alone were the authority. That I was lying. Without even giving me a chance to clarify.

So yeah, please stop chiming in with an opinion on something you know nothing about 😂

My post still stands. Latest issue is out, and in it, Garou explains he etc etc etc.

H1, come back when you've read it and can discuss it with those who have.

I specifically told you the last issue I read. You replied, "read it again" KNOWING that it was the wrong issue. That was your chance to clarify but you chose to Troll.

Lying is being deceitful on purpose. You purposely gave me the impression that it was in the issue I read (as to why you said read it again). It wasn't in that issue but you tried to make me believe that by telling me to read it again. That's the definition of lying.

Note: a liar is a person who OFTEN lies. It's not a person who told a lie before since EVERYONE WOULD BE LIARS if that was the case.

Originally posted by h1a8
I specifically explaines WHICH ISSUE I READ. Saint trolled and said,"read it again" KNOWING it's the wrong issue. It's bias of you not to clearly see him trolling and is wrong.

No where in Google can you find the unreleased issue.
Type one punch man 168 or one punch man issues
and I guarantee you can't find it.

Hence my previous comment..just ask what was he referring to so he can point you in the right direction since you obviously didn't know.

I wouldn't say he trolled you. I'd say he baited you, successfully.