Originally posted by h1a8
"if" is a common word in the English language. Look it upSaitama easily reacted to Sonic attacks, made 10+ afterimages of himself, did DBZ instant transmission like movements on enemies, etc
That's far faster than the bullet catch normal Sentry did (his fastest feat I've seen).
So basically your entire post was worthless. Cheers.
This isn't normal Sentry in the thread. Look it up.
Originally posted by DeadpoolXXX
okay. but my point is that saitama getting to that level happened over the course of the entire fight, and it took several plot conveniences to get him there. it was a gradual progression, not some sort of instantaneous powerup that he blinked into.so like i asked- how does "no cis" apply to a complete gag character like saitama? because that is literally how he ALWAYS fights. he starts off at his normal level, lets the other guy beat on him a bit, throws in a dash of quippy one liners, then starts tapping more of his power until he wins...... even against a "god level" threat like cosmic garou.
if we are JUST using saitama as he was fighting on IO (Ie. the absolute highest level we've ever seen him), then so be it. but it does need clarification, because the no cis concept is hard to wrap my head around when it comes to saitama. the guy is the essence of cis.
you miss the point. yes saitama is very powerful by any metric, and can beat anyone in the opm universe. but that way of thinking doesnt automatically cross over to comic characters.
We're not using Io Saitama. Galan had a good write-up (not as good as mine, but the nature of Carver means only mods can make him back down).
Originally posted by h1a8
Wasn't worthless. If is a very relevant word in logic.
Normal Sentry is faster than DS by feats (or no slower).
If Sentry wins, Saitama loses.
If Saitama wins, Sentry loses. Truly, h1, your post has added to the sum total of human knowledge.
How fast does one need to be to create afterimages?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
If Sentry wins, Saitama loses.If Saitama wins, Sentry loses. Truly, h1, your post has added to the sum total of human knowledge.
How fast does one need to be to create afterimages?
It does not take a rocket scientist to understand the true meaning of that sentence.
I'll break it down since you don't get it.
The sentence has multiple meanings.
The first meaning (if the time is known)
The sentence implies that I don't know how long it takes for Sentry to resurrect from disintegration and therefore, requests from others, who may know "how long" to give their input on the matter.
The second meaning (if the time is unknown by all)
Also, the sentence is merely stating that the outcome is unknown due to the unknown amount of time it takes for Sentry to resurrect.
Creating 10 afterimages is faster than anything Sentry has done that is related to battle. So the claim that Sentry is faster is unsupported.
Originally posted by carver9
That's not what you said
Weak, tucking tail already. Concession not accepted.
Originally posted by h1a8
Here's the statement :
If it takes more than 10 seconds for Sentry to resurrect from disintegration then Saitama wins.It does not take a rocket scientist to understand the true meaning of that sentence.
I'll break it down since you don't get it.
The sentence has multiple meanings.The first meaning (if the time is known)
The sentence implies that I don't know how long it takes for Sentry to resurrect from disintegration and therefore, requests from others, who may know "how long" to give their input on the matter.The second meaning (if the time is unknown by all)
Also, the sentence is merely stating that the outcome is unknown due to the unknown amount of time it takes for Sentry to resurrect.Creating 10 afterimages is faster than anything Sentry has done that is related to battle. So the claim that Sentry is faster is unsupported.
But how fast is an after image?