Originally posted by Smurph
Anyways, is there any evidence for the above?
Fighting skill is something that can't be truly quantified. That's why it's highly unlikely to predict who would win for real life fights with substantial records.
Imo, fighting skill can be subjective to a degree and partially objective only to a trained fighter (someone with sufficient fighting knowledge and experience).
ABC logic can be faulty (if that is the only thing used). A beat B. But how good is B? Well B beat C. But how good is C? It can go on and on until we reach thugs or street fodder.
I'm not going to say that WW is more skilled than BW.
I'm going to say WW is more skilled (imo) based off the fights I've seen (which isn't every fight in existence).
Now if someone shows me a skilled fight by BW that, in my eyes, matches or exceeds WWs best from my memory then I'll side with BW for equal stats.