Superman vs Gorr, Old King Thor, Young Thor

Started by ODG8 pages

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Huh? Superman literally destroyed the planet WF created by jumping off, I.E, collateral damage, when he was at his deathbed, in the same arc
Your inept non sequitur has nothing to do with the punch he dealt World Forger.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Keep ignoring that (1) you have nothing to prove the Multiverse WF created depends on his anvil to survive (2) WF feared Superman in the same arc (3) the on-panel evidence only directly state Superman destroyed WF's Multiverse, not he destroyed it by destroying his anvil

And that's how we suppose read comics? By a conjecture you have no way to actually prove to be true and as I showed, collateral damage means little isn't exactly new for comics

Keep suggesting that Superman punching World Forger in the face created shockwaves that reverberated so violently they (i) only cratered the planet, (ii) destroyed his crisis anvil, (iii) didn't kill the Justice League, (iv) killed the alternate multiverse Justice League, but (v) directly destroyed a multiverse.

No, that isn't how we're supposed to read comics. But whatever Superman-blanky you need to wrap yourself in, you do you.

Originally posted by ODG
Actually, I implied you're either a sock with a decade-long resentment or you're as poster with a colossal hardon that you'd actually research someone's profile in the hopes of finding an innocuous past username to hang an insult on. Whichever choice you want to own up to, that's on you, pal.

When the mods reference your IP address, let me know.


And I say you are either playing dumb or just that dumb to interpret my posts in that way

But let's do a IP test, shall we? And I also take it as you accept the condition if you lose, I.E at least give me an apology

Originally posted by ODG
Your inept non sequitur has nothing to do with the punch he dealt World Forger. Keep suggesting that Superman punching World Forger in the face created shockwaves that reverberated so violently they [b](i) only cratered the planet, (ii) destroyed his crisis anvil, (iii) didn't kill the Justice League, (iv) killed the alternate multiverse Justice League, but (v) directly destroyed a multiverse.

No, that isn't how we're supposed to read comics. But whatever Superman-blanky you need to wrap yourself in, you do you. [/B]


This is you?
Originally posted by ODG

Logically, Superman never showed the ability to directly destroy a multiverse, universe, galaxy, planet with collateral damage.

Yeah, keep repeating yourself, but unfortunately you can't provide even one proof that explicitly shows what you claimed

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
And I say you are either playing dumb or just that dumb to interpret my posts in that way
Unfortunately, you're simply projecting you own dimwitted behavior onto me.

Maybe focus on the actual comics instead?

Granted, that would only counter your own inanity. But this is about comics, after all. Don't hide. Don't run. The truth will come to you.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
But let's do a IP test, shall we? And I also take it as you accept the condition if you lose, I.E at least give me an apology
I told you to go for it several times. I implied you're either a sock with a decade-long resentment or you're a poster with a colossal hardon that you'd actually research someone's profile in the hopes of finding an innocuous past username to hang an insult on. Whichever choice you want to own up to, that's on you, pal.

Originally posted by ODG
Unfortunately, you're simply projecting you own dimwitted behavior onto me.

Maybe focus on the actual comics instead? I told you to go for it several times. I implied you're either a sock with a decade-long resentment or you're a poster with a colossal hardon that you'd actually research someone's profile in the hopes of finding an innocuous past username to hang an insult on. Whichever choice you want to own up to, that's on you, pal.


What behavior? You're literally the one who accused me for lying, and when I retorted, you begun mocking my English( which, ironically, you seem pretty unhappy when the roles switched)

Originally posted by ODG
This doesn't change anything of what I've said. Good on you to understand context (sorta). Bad on you to try to leave it out when it suits your distorted myth.

Whoa, deja vu???


Originally posted by ODG
^ English? Do you speak it?

And when I retorted you again, you played "you're a sock" card, and then you saying I'm either a sock or a mean spirited

So backed down the challenge I see

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
What behavior? You're literally the one who accused me for lying, and when I retorted, you begun mocking my English( which, ironically, you seem pretty unhappy when the roles switched)
Follow the course of conversation, or don't.

I don't know if this is the result of broken English but it's either that or imbecility. Neither of which I have to apologize for.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
And when I retorted you again, you played "you're a sock" card, and then you saying I'm either a sock or a mean spirited

So backed down the challenge I see

I told you to go for it several times. I implied you're either a sock with a decade-long resentment or you're a poster with a colossal hard-on that you'd actually research someone's profile in the hopes of finding an innocuous past username to hang an insult on. Whichever choice you want to own up to, that's on you, pal.

But keep clumsily maneuvering the conversation away from the WF scene itself. This isn't a tactic I've encountered on the KMC forums ever. 😂

Originally posted by ODG
Follow the course of conversation, or don't.

I don't know if this is the result of broken English but it's either that or imbecility. I told you to go for it several times. I implied you're either a sock with a decade-long resentment or you're a poster with a colossal hardon that you'd actually research someone's profile in the hopes of finding an innocuous past username to hang an insult on. Whichever choice you want to own up to, that's on you, pal.


Well, the course of conversation is you wrong in this claim 🙂

Originally posted by ODG

Logically, Superman never showed the ability to directly destroy a multiverse, universe, galaxy, planet with collateral damage.

https://ibb.co/9sBc0kS
https://ibb.co/pLGwxL1

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998

Huh? Superman literally destroyed the planet WF created by jumping off, I.E, collateral damage, when he was at his deathbed, in the same arc

And I'm pretty sure you are aware of Jaxon scene, no?

Edit for your edit:

Lol, what you said didn't address anything in my points, just keep throwing your own views without any definite evidence.
Like I said before, I also can argue the prime Superman is the most powerful Superman across all iterations
Batman's suit protects the rest league etcetc
If we go by vague implications of course

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Well, the course of conversation is you wrong in this claim 🙂

https://ibb.co/9sBc0kS
https://ibb.co/pLGwxL1

And I'm pretty sure you are aware of Jaxon scene, no?

Rewriting the history of the conversation, check?

Superman directly busted that planet. Or is collateral damage far beyond your grasp of the English language?

WTF does pre-Crisis Jaxon have to do with the World Forger? Does anybody care about a 50 year pre-Crisis scene? Did the writer of the actual Justice League #25 comic care? Or the artist? Or anybody else who wasn't a pitifully desperate propagandist?

This is a level beyond Superman apologist nonsense. You're just being a little sh1t trying to place the burdens of proof on everybody but yourself.

But that's exactly how I called you out from the beginning. Not exactly a revelation, amirite?

Originally posted by ODG
Rewriting the history of the conversation, check?

Superman directly busted that planet. Or is collateral damage far beyond your grasp of the English language?

WTF does pre-Crisis Jaxon have to do with the World Forger? Does anybody care about a 50 year pre-Crisis scene? Did the writer of the actual Justice League #25 comic care? Or the artist? Or anybody else who wasn't a pitifully desperate propogandist?

This is a level beyond Superman apologist nonsense. You're just being a little sh1t trying to place the burdens of proof on everybody but yourself.

collateral damage:

injury inflicted on something other than an intended target

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collateral%20damage

Or are you trying to say Superman was trying to jumping into the planet instead of jumping off it?

Yeah, because you said Superman *never* showed the ability to directly do it with collateral damage

Originally posted by ODG

Logically, Superman never showed the ability to directly destroy a multiverse, universe, galaxy, planet with collateral damage.

And

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998

Edit for your edit:

Lol, what you said didn't address anything in my points, just keep throwing your own views without any definite evidence.
Like I said before, I also can argue the prime Superman is the most powerful Superman across all iterations
Batman's suit protects the rest league etcetc
If we go by vague implications of course

^ Mock my grasp of the English language, check?

Originally posted by ODG
^ Mock my grasp of the English language, check?

LMAO, you are the one who did it in the first place, just a post above

Originally posted by ODG

Superman directly busted that planet. Or is collateral damage far beyond your grasp of the English language?

Originally posted by ODG
1) Mock my grasp of the English language, check?
2) Ignore all attempts to move on from arguing English language interpretation, check?
3) Gracelessly shift the burden of the proof, check?
4) Move the goalposts, check?
5) Degenerate the conversation with increasing trollery, check?
6) Avoid all attempts to bring the conversation to a close, by avoiding a single, direct and simple question, check?
7) Rewrite the history of the conversation, check?
8) Pretend you're not being insulting, check?
9) Accuse the other poster of starting it, check?
10) Simply pretend that the entire course of conversation hasn't turned out utterly disastrous for yourself, check?
11) Rinse/repeat your trollery for another several pages to make it look like we're both equally at fault for how much this conversation has degraded, check?

Y'see I count 6-7 of these steps here over the last few pages.

Yeah, it is a good example for showing how you projecting yourself to others

Originally posted by ODG
7) Rewrite the history of the conversation, check?
8) Pretend you're not being insulting, check?
9) Accuse the other poster of starting it, check?
10) Simply pretend that the entire course of conversation hasn't turned out utterly disastrous for yourself, check?
11) Rinse/repeat your trollery for another several pages to make it look like we're both equally at fault for how much this conversation has degraded, check?
Whatever you need to distance the conversation away from the actual comic scene we're discussing, after all. 😂

Originally posted by ODG
Whatever you need to distance the conversation away from the actual comic scene we're discussing, after all. 😂

Isn't you are the one running?

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998

Edit for your edit:

Lol, what you said didn't address anything in my points, just keep throwing your own views without any definite evidence.
Like I said before, I also can argue the prime Superman is the most powerful Superman across all iterations
Batman's suit protects the rest league etcetc
If we go by vague implications of course

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998

And

Don't forget you're the one who brought up Superman didn't destroy a planet via collateral damage. And when I brought up Superman did it in the same story we're talking about, you begun blabbing about "you are mocking my English"

Originally posted by ODG
^ Mock my grasp of the English language, check?

🙂

Edit:
And I still don't see how you retort collateral damage means little in comics, based on how it's portrayed in comics

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Isn't you are the one running?
The reverse projection is strong in this one.

What makes you think I'm not content to thoroughly undress you over and over again? Maybe do more research into my past posting will dissuade you of such illusions. 😂

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Don't forget you're the one who brought up Superman didn't destroy a planet via collateral damage. And when I brought up Superman did it in the same story we're talking about, you begun blabbing about "you are mocking my English"

🙂

Because Superman literally bounded off that planet. You can pretend that your grasp of the English language is inept. But don't insult the rest of us by projecting that ineptitude onto us.

Originally posted by ODG
The reverse projection is strong in this one.

What makes you think I'm not content to thoroughly undress you over and over again? Maybe do more research into my past posting will dissuade you of such illusions. 😂 Because Superman literally bounded off that planet. You can pretend that your grasp of the English language is inept. But don't insult the rest of us by projecting that ineptitude onto us.


Oh, but the dictionary seems to disagree with you
injury inflicted on something other than an intended target

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collateral%20damage

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998

Or are you trying to say Superman was trying to jumping into the planet instead of jumping off it?

Also

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998

Edit:
And I still don't see how you retort collateral damage means little in comics, based on how it's portrayed in comics


and
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998

Lol, what you said didn't address anything in my points, just keep throwing your own views without any definite evidence.
Like I said before, I also can argue the prime Superman is the most powerful Superman across all iterations
Batman's suit protects the rest league etcetc
If we go by vague implications of course

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Oh, but the dictionary seems to disagree with you

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collateral%20damage

Also

and

Quoting dictionaries will gain you no purchase here, senor dumbassio.

Superman directly applied the force of his limbs to that planet when he bounded off it. If you want to rely on broken English, that's fair for morons who don't grasp it completely.

And I'd give you a pass for that, if you weren't so quick to insult my grasp of the English language.

But I mean... that's all you're left with given that you've completely given up on discussing the actual WF punch scene in question. How unsightly.

Not my first rodeo pal.

Originally posted by ODG
Quoting dictionaries will gain you no purchase here, senor dumbassio.

Superman directly applied the force of his limbs to that planet when he bounded off it. If you want to rely on broken English, that's fair for morons who don't grasp it completely.

And I'd give you a pass for that, if you weren't so quick to insult my grasp of the English language.

But I mean... that's all you're left with given that you've completely given up on discussing the actual WF punch scene in question. How unsightly.

Not my first rodeo pal.


By that logic, Superman also directly applied force on WF and his Multiverse(albeit, a small part of it. pretty much like Superman only applied his force on a small part of the planet)
So I guess he destroyed the Multiverse WF created isn't a collateral damage, which undermining your point in your original sentence

And you don't reply other points, strange, despite one of them is the WF scene you're blabbing about
But I like how you call others dumbassio, when your username is "OneDumbG0" 🙂