It's always you three. It doesn't matter who I'm addressing or what the topic is, the other two will always jump to the rescue. As early as yesterday when Smurph tried to correct me on copyright law, you and abhi were there defending him even though he was wrong: dodging my points, straw-manning me, and eventually ended up conceding.
I get that you three are upset with me. At one point or another, you all bragged about how big your dicks were and I pulled down your pants, publicity exposing the lie. Smurph wasn't even part of it before I corrected him by posting a rudimentary proof on why opinions can't be wrong and then had to explain to him how a priori proofs work.
Originally posted by Astner
Retcons are retroactive, hence the name. You attempted something similar not too long ago where you were trying to dismiss the fact that Dark Crisis made the Multiverse infinite, and when I pointed out the holes in your explanation your final excuse was, and I'm paraphrasing: "comics don't make sense."
Its not a retcon since dark crisis itself makes sure to let us know that Green Arrow is dead.
I bring this up because this is exactly how our spat will turn out if I engage you on this subject. You'll do you, I'll correct you, and you'll dismiss the rebuttal on the premise that I'm being too stringent in my analysis, not not granting you the interpretive freedom to dismiss the scene.
How do you reconcile Green Arrow's presence in Failsafe arc?
No I haven't. The reason I gave up on the debate is because you started to dig into the feats of unrelated characters to compensate for Superman's lack of comparable feats, while simultaneously downplaying the Silver Surfer.
😂
I remember you were literally dismissing every feat from Superman because magic demon and whatever. Real display of intelligence right there.
Even then the core of your argument was that Green Lanterns had survived inside black holes. Which didn't work in context of the debate for two reasons: it's not quantifiable, and because even Dazzler has survived inside of a black hole after a temporary buff by Galactus, see Dazzler #11 for the context.
"It does not count and even if it did, see this random character also survive who had no encounters with surfer".
Sure, dude.
The telemarketer calling the optimization engineer stupid.
Wow, you really are Nostradamus.
Abhi, this insult doesn't work.
Cool story bro.
This is like calling a 6'8" guy a midget. If you want your insults to be effective you have to anchor them in insecurities of whoever you're trying to insult.
Even the people I frequently disagree with and insult know better, here are some examples from this month:
And unlike you, I'm not in part of the House of El or some other circle-jerk group that would garner any unwarranted praise.
Speaking of which, I only remember seeing you being insulted for your intelligence or more aptly: the lack thereof. But I digress.
"This insult doesn't work on me, look at the random guys on the forum who say how intelligent I am".
😂
Originally posted by Astner
It's always you three. It doesn't matter who I'm addressing or what the topic is, the other two will always jump to the rescue. As early as yesterday when Smurph tried to correct me on copyright law, you and abhi were there defending him even though he was wrong: dodging my points, straw-manning me, and eventually ended up conceding.I get that you three are upset with me. At one point or another, you all bragged about how big your dicks were and I pulled down your pants, publicity exposing the lie. Smurph wasn't even part of it before I corrected him by posting a rudimentary proof on why opinions can't be wrong and then had to explain to him how a priori proofs work.
Uhuh, ok 😂 this site is just meant to be a bit of fun, chill and touch some grass.
Originally posted by Astner
It's always you three. It doesn't matter who I'm addressing or what the topic is, the other two will always jump to the rescue. As early as yesterday when Smurph tried to correct me on copyright law, you and abhi were there defending him even though he was wrong: dodging my points, straw-manning me, and eventually ended up conceding.I get that you three are upset with me. At one point or another, you all bragged about how big your dicks were and I pulled down your pants, publicity exposing the lie. Smurph wasn't even part of it before I corrected him by posting a rudimentary proof on why opinions can't be wrong and then had to explain to him how a priori proofs work.
They are the Super (man) click. Always hanging together.
Re: Re: Superman/Silver Surfer/ Thor power breakdown
Originally posted by carver9
1. Strength = Thor, Superman close second and Surfer not that far off
2. Power lever output = Surfer
3. Endurance = all are equals
4. Travel Speed = Surfer no contest
5. Reflexes and combat speed = Superman, Surfers close
6. Telepathic resistance = Surfer then Superman
7. Intelligence = Superman
8. Healing Factor = Surfer no contest
9. Longevity = Surfer
10. Willpower = Supes
11. Miscellaneous powers and abilities = Surfer no contestThis is me using current versions of each and including Mjlonir and Surfers board.
1. Superman is many times stronger than Thor. What quantifiable feat by Thor makes you think he's stronger?
2. This is hard to judge as Superman's hv can be more penetrating than any of the others attacks. It is smaller in size though. What has more powerful input, a high caliber pointy bullet or a sledge hammer powered by a human?
3. Superman has traveled to the center of the universe in a few panels.
Originally posted by StoicThe OP considers pre 52 Superman. Not a white sun amped Superman.
There will be a bunch of butt hurt people over things that matter little. However, Superman currently blows these cats out of the water. He’s stoopid powerful. DC will never allow another mainstream comic book character to be more powerful than Superman they have a 110% match guarantee attached to Superman, because that’s his real super power, which is to be more powerful than any one character to full groups of characters. He will always get another buff. Just get used to it.
The OP considers normal Surfer. Not Silver Surfer Black.
The OP considers normal Thor. Not OF Thor.
It's unclear who exactly you're addressing with your posts but whatever point you're trying to make has nothing to do with this thread.
Originally posted by Astnercrylaugh
It's always you three. It doesn't matter who I'm addressing or what the topic is, the other two will always jump to the rescue. As early as yesterday when Smurph tried to correct me on copyright law, you and abhi were there defending him even though he was wrong: dodging my points, straw-manning me, and eventually ended up conceding.I get that you three are upset with me. At one point or another, you all bragged about how big your dicks were and I pulled down your pants, publicity exposing the lie. Smurph wasn't even part of it before I corrected him by posting a rudimentary proof on why opinions can't be wrong and then had to explain to him how a priori proofs work.
So to recap - in a thread that I wasn't posting in, Astner:
- got called stupid and took offense
- quoted other posters calling him smart
- brought me up, for some reason
- started ranting about other arguments with me (and lied about them)
- talked about getting my pants down to find out the size of my dick
Stay winning, Astner
Originally posted by AstnerAlso, let's not start referring to our job titles as if they mean anything, you absolute clown.
The telemarketer calling the optimization engineer stupid.
Otherwise that conversation that's got you so butthurt was just an engineer trying to lecture a lawyer on the difference between a colloquial definition and a legal definition.