Eternal Sunshine of Guy222's and Rao's Minds (v2.0)

Started by Galan007186 pages

Originally posted by steverules_2
So in ROTJ the emperor says to Luke ‘strike me down and your journey towards the dark side will be complete.’ Luke tries to strike down the emperor but Vader stops him. Why? Wasn’t the idea to turn Luke to the dark side? Was Luke trying to strike him down him turning to the dark side? Did Vader stop Luke to prevent Luke turning? Literally that scene brings up so many questions.
Luke fully intended to kill Palpatine in that moment, which was the catalyst Palpatine wanted to see. From Luke's POV, killing the Emperor = the end of the Empire... But from Palpatine's POV, the act just meant that Luke was ready to be fully overtaken by the dark side.

In Legends, Vader likely protected Palpatine because he was just a subservient lapdog. Palpatine had complete faith in Vader's obedience and never really intended to die then and there. IOW, he knew Vader would protect him, but still wanted to see the depth's of Luke's anger/rage.

In canon, you could argue that Vader "protected" Palpatine, because he knew that if Luke struck him down, Palpatine might just essence-transfer himself into Luke's body -- this was ambiguously alluded to in the ROS novel.

Originally posted by Galan007
Luke fully intended to kill Palpatine in that moment, which was the catalyst Palpatine wanted to see. From Luke's POV, killing the Emperor = the end of the Empire... But from Palpatine's POV, the act just meant that Luke was ready to be fully overtaken by the dark side.

In Legends, Vader likely protected Palpatine because he was just a subservient lapdog. Palpatine had complete faith in Vader's obedience and never really intended to die then and there. IOW, he knew Vader would protect him, but still wanted to see the depth's of Luke's anger/rage.

In canon, you could argue that Vader "protected" Palpatine, because he knew that if Luke struck him down, Palpatine might just essence-transfer himself into Luke's body -- this was ambiguously alluded to in the ROS novel.

Interesting. mhmm Thanks for the explanation 👆

After chopping Vader's hand off, Luke looks at his own bionic hand and decides to stop giving in to his anger.

Palps is not exactly happy with that - "If you will not be turned... you will be destroyed".

^ Yes! That moment is super important.

Originally posted by Galan007
Luke fully intended to kill Palpatine in that moment, which was the catalyst Palpatine wanted to see. From Luke's POV, killing the Emperor = the end of the Empire... But from Palpatine's POV, the act just meant that Luke was ready to be fully overtaken by the dark side.
Without delving into secondary material, it seemed obvious to me that Palpatine was just goading Luke into killing him. But such a deathblow wasn't what would have ultimately turned Luke to the Dark Side. No, it was the inevitable clash with, and murder of, his own father that would have truly completed Luke's journey to the Dark Side.
Originally posted by Galan007
In Legends, Vader likely protected Palpatine because he was just a subservient lapdog. Palpatine had complete faith in Vader's obedience and never really intended to die then and there. IOW, he knew Vader would protect him, but still wanted to see the depth's of Luke's anger/rage.
Again, acknowledging my own ignorance of secondary material, I think the movie portrayed Vader as having way more agency than that. Vader developed ulterior plans against Palpatine that involved bringing his own son towards the Dark Side because he thought that him and Luke together diving into that side of the Force would be powerful enough to challenge Palpatine.

Think back to that moment in Luke/Vader's duel when Luke's feelings become unguarded and Vader realizes Leia is also a Skywalker. Vader goes for it and brings out Luke's unmitigated rage at 3:30:

YouTube video Palpatine wanted Luke to descend towards the Dark Side to replace Vader as his apprentice. Vader wanted Luke to descend towards the Dark Side to join him and overthrow the Emperor. He said as much during his first duel in Empire Strikes Back. No reason to think Vader was lying.

Originally posted by Galan007
In canon, you could argue that Vader "protected" Palpatine, because he knew that if Luke struck him down, Palpatine might just essence-transfer himself into Luke's body -- this was ambiguously alluded to in the ROS novel.
*groan*

Sounds about as unnecessary a "retcon" as the entirety of the Solo film.

Originally posted by steverules_2
So in ROTJ the emperor says to Luke ‘strike me down and your journey towards the dark side will be complete.’ Luke tries to strike down the emperor but Vader stops him. Why? Wasn’t the idea to turn Luke to the dark side? Was Luke trying to strike him down him turning to the dark side? Did Vader stop Luke to prevent Luke turning? Literally that scene brings up so many questions.

My opinion of it is that Vader is in two minds. One, he has to protect the Emperor, being his master, and the other, he has to protect Luke from making the same mistakes he did.

Vader is conflicted going in to the fight, so to me it makes sense.

Originally posted by ODG
^ Yes! That moment is super important. Without delving into secondary material, it seemed obvious to me that Palpatine was just goading Luke into killing him. But such a deathblow wasn't what would have ultimately turned Luke to the Dark Side. No, it was the inevitable clash with, and murder of, his own father that would have truly completed Luke's journey to the Dark Side. Again, acknowledging my own ignorance of secondary material, I think the movie portrayed Vader as having way more agency than that. Vader developed ulterior plans against Palpatine that involved bringing his own son towards the Dark Side because he thought that him and Luke together diving into that side of the Force would be powerful enough to challenge Palpatine.

Think back to that moment in Luke/Vader's duel when Luke's feelings become unguarded and Vader realizes Leia is also a Skywalker. Vader goes for it and brings out Luke's unmitigated rage at 3:30:

Palpatine wanted Luke to descend towards the Dark Side to replace Vader as his apprentice. Vader wanted Luke to descend towards the Dark Side to join him and overthrow the Emperor. He said as much during his first duel in Empire Strikes Back. No reason to think Vader was lying. *groan*

It's difficult for me to have this kind of discussion without mentioning secondary material, because it's all under the same umbrella canon -- the comics/novels, for example, are just as canon as the films.

That said, during ESB, Vader initially did want Luke to join him in hopes of overthrowing Palpatine... But Vader had a change of heart afterwards. Not only did he witness the true depths of Palpatine's power(and therefore knew that standing against him was pointless), but he also saw Luke's potential, and began viewing him as a threat/rival. He actually wanted Luke dead(this was even corroborated in one of the novels that was set during their RotJ encounter.)

Where Palpatine is concerned, he was just goading Luke into using his "aggressive feelings", thereby pushing him towards the dark side and becoming the new apprentice.

The first instance was seeing if Luke would actually try to strike him down in a fit of rage(which Luke did), but again: Palpatine never actually intended to die in that moment. He had complete faith in Vader's obedience... Heck, Vader made his obedience to Palpatine abundantly clear during the film itself, while he was speaking to Luke: "You don't know the power of the dark side... I MUST OBEY my Master."

The second instance was goading Luke into killing Vader(ie. his own father)... Which Luke very nearly did, until his final "breakthrough moment."

But when Palpatine realized that Luke could not be corrupted, he decided to kill him... And it was only then that Vader finally had his own breakthrough moment -- properly turning against his Master, in order to save his son.

Originally posted by ODG
Sounds about as unnecessary a "retcon" as the entirety of the Solo film.
I wish that were the worst of it. 🙁

Doctor Aphra was the worst, iyo?

Or Rian "Ruin" Johnson...? 😛

^ They're both in the same general tier, imo. 😘

Galan keeps protesting he hates midgets...yet loves Yoda. Suspicious.

Yoda is probably one of the worst midgets of them all, tbh.

Like, remember how....hairy he was in ESB. How pervy.

I bet the swamps of Dagobah had nothing on his pits.

<----User banned, permanently ----->

While Yoda was in office, the CIS came to power under the leadership of Count Dooku(Yoda's former padawan), which caused the deaths of numerous Jedi and countless Republic citizens... But worse yet, Yoda also allowed the formation of the Empire under the leadership of Palpatine/Vader, who eradicated 99.9% of the Jedi population and enslaved the entire galaxy.

He is one of the worst midgets. 👆

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Galan keeps protesting he hates midgets...yet loves Yoda. Suspicious.

Back when he was alive, Bran used to warn us.

Galan loved the old muppet version of Yoda resurfacing in TLJ.

That's even worse. All those wrinkles, all those folds. Moist, and clammy. When he moves, I bet it was with a shlick shlick noise.

He could be hiding under Galan's sheets as he sleeps.

RIP Dillon, you son of a *****

One of the few black actors I have liked.

Gone too soon. Rest in peace.

RIP Carl Weathers

For him there really is no tomorrow

Originally posted by Galan007
It's difficult for me to have this kind of discussion without mentioning secondary material, because it's all under the same umbrella canon -- the comics/novels, for example, are just as canon as the films.

That said, during ESB, Vader initially did want Luke to join him in hopes of overthrowing Palpatine... But Vader had a change of heart afterwards. Not only did he witness the true depths of Palpatine's power(and therefore knew that standing against him was pointless), but he also saw Luke's potential, and began viewing him as a threat/rival. He actually wanted Luke dead(this was even corroborated in one of the novels that was set during their RotJ encounter.)

Can't argue with the secondary material. But, bleh.
Originally posted by Galan007
Where Palpatine is concerned, he was just goading Luke into using his "aggressive feelings", thereby pushing him towards the dark side and becoming the new apprentice.

The first instance was seeing if Luke would actually try to strike him down in a fit of rage(which Luke did), but again: Palpatine never actually intended to die in that moment. He had complete faith in Vader's obedience... Heck, Vader made his obedience to Palpatine abundantly clear during the film itself, while he was speaking to Luke: "You don't know the power of the dark side... I MUST OBEY my Master."

The second instance was goading Luke into killing Vader(ie. his own father)... Which Luke very nearly did, until his final "breakthrough moment."

But when Palpatine realized that Luke could not be corrupted, he decided to kill him... And it was only then that Vader finally had his own breakthrough moment -- properly turning against his Master, in order to save his son.

I wish that were the worst of it. 🙁

👆

But had Palpatine goaded Luke into the Dark Side, what would've happened to Darth Vader? The whole Sith "Rule of Two" thing which, even I as a casual fan know about.

I guess what I'm asking is whether we all agree that Luke daring to strike Palpatine down was only an initial step towards the Dark Side. It never would've happened (in Palpatine's mind anyway whether Darth Vader was utterly his thrall or otherwise). It was Luke killing Darth Vader that would have sealed Luke's fate as Palpatine's apprentice.

I assumed Vader would have been replaced. Or even join Luke and Palestine - was the Rule of Two around during RotJ?

I think at the time, Vader was just a cyborg slave to Palpatine - only later did we learn more about him as Anakin etc. So can well believe he would/could have just allowed himself to be sacrificed for the good of the Sith.