Originally posted by carver9
That's not true. There has been small black holes and stars in DC, lol. You don't know what the writer meant, unless ya got proof that you want to post. Scans please.
Small stars naturally occurring in DC? Prove it.
Everyone knows what the writer meant idiot.
"You can't break those chains.""They are used to haul phucking stars between galaxies". The point was to prove the chains can't be broken.
Small altered unnatural stars would go against that silly Billy.
Originally posted by h1a8
Small stars naturally occurring in DC? Prove it.
Everyone knows what the writer meant idiot.
"You can't break those chains.""They are used to haul phucking stars between galaxies". The point was to prove the chains can't be broken.
Small altered unnatural stars would go against that silly Billy.
Batman was towing small suns around in his gloves. 10 of them. What's the writers intent for this? Also, a solar system was full of small suns, H1.
You're a troll, H1, a troll that doesn't read comics.
Originally posted by carver9
Batman was towing small suns around in his gloves. 10 of them. What's the writers intent for this? Also, a solar system was full of small suns, H1.You're a troll, H1, a troll that doesn't read comics.
Originally posted by h1a8
Everyone knows what the writer meant idiot.
"You can't break those chains.""They are used to haul phucking stars between galaxies". The point was to prove the chains can't be broken.
Small altered unnatural stars would go against that silly Billy.
Originally posted by carver9
You're a troll, H1, a troll that doesn't read comics.
Honestly, why bother Carv? He's a guy that tries to bring real world logic into an area where it doesnt exist. Its futile to argue with somebody who lives in their own lonely world like that. He will only continue to twist things until they fit his narrative totally ignoring actual on panel feats and intent. Its so much easier to just ignore him and move on. He's not worth the aggravation.
Originally posted by tkitna
Honestly, why bother Carv? He's a guy that tries to bring real world logic into an area where it doesnt exist. Its futile to argue with somebody who lives in their own lonely world like that. He will only continue to twist things until they fit his narrative totally ignoring actual on panel feats and intent. Its so much easier to just ignore him and move on. He's not worth the aggravation.
I agree. Done with H1
Originally posted by carver9those were shrunk with the help of ray palmer.
Batman was towing small suns around in his gloves. 10 of them. What's the writers intent for this? Also, a solar system was full of small suns, H1.You're a troll, H1, a troll that doesn't read comics.
When ray palmer shrinks and enters a normal human’s arteries, are those arteries withstanding a grown man’s weight in his heart? I don’t think so. Seems like the weight and size properties change but what the person is made up of do not. Same way as those microscopic red suns, weight and size were altered but other properties did not. We know this because they didn’t run out of energy and kept producing red sunlight. All you had to do was read your scan in it’s entirety not just look at the pictures of small red suns on a glove.
Originally posted by tkitnaSo you want to troll too by supporting Carver?
Honestly, why bother Carv? He's a guy that tries to bring real world logic into an area where it doesnt exist. Its futile to argue with somebody who lives in their own lonely world like that. He will only continue to twist things until they fit his narrative totally ignoring actual on panel feats and intent. Its so much easier to just ignore him and move on. He's not worth the aggravation.
Originally posted by carver9You say things like that when my last post is hard to refute.
I agree. Done with H1
Clearly the writer was trying to make a point to why the chains are extremely durable. Towing miniature stars, something Batman (a human) can lugg around will contradict that point. You are clearly trolling now.
Originally posted by tkitna
Honestly, why bother Carv? He's a guy that tries to bring real world logic into an area where it doesnt exist. Its futile to argue with somebody who lives in their own lonely world like that. He will only continue to twist things until they fit his narrative totally ignoring actual on panel feats and intent. Its so much easier to just ignore him and move on. He's not worth the aggravation.
And he does the same thing in the Movie Forum.
At best, it means he's a troll taking a lot of pleasure in it.
At worst, he's one of the most autistic people on the Internet as a whole.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTWHave you read the entire exchange before commenting?
And he does the same thing in the Movie Forum.At best, it means he's a troll taking a lot of pleasure in it.
At worst, he's one of the most autistic people on the Internet as a whole.
Summary, Carv is trying to say the chain feat for Superman doesn't count.
Although the writer states the chain can't be broken because they are used to haul stars between galaxies, Carv assumes these are miniature stars (where Batman can lug around and carry) as to prove the chains cannot be broken.
Yet he gets away with trolling like that only to comment on me. I'm not actually doing any trolling, Carv is.
Originally posted by tkitna
Honestly, why bother Carv? He's a guy that tries to bring real world logic into an area where it doesnt exist. Its futile to argue with somebody who lives in their own lonely world like that. He will only continue to twist things until they fit his narrative totally ignoring actual on panel feats and intent. Its so much easier to just ignore him and move on. He's not worth the aggravation.
I didn't realise he was known for this. I wouldn't have bothered engaging with him otherwise. He will literally ignore explicit evidence and attempt to gaslight you whilst providing zero evidence for an entire thread.
Thanks for the heads up 👆