If you give 2 different arguments why something is the case and I argue against one of the them (concede to the other) then I'm nitpicking by definition. It's a logical fallacy. It does not defeat an argument at all. And that's 50%. % does not matter in the definition.
Yes, he stopped trying to eat the guard.
I meant as far as being visibly damaged or stunned. It's impressive. A bee sting can make me drop someone. Yes KS felt the blow. But it had no stun or damage effect.
Writer's have different opinions yes. But that's irrelevant due to us taking the highest showings (prevent those bias against a character to cherry pick that character's lows against their characters highs) I know no writer that wrote KS to not being bulletproof (bullets bounce off him) or not being able to hurt AM and the likes.
He's at least several times stronger than KP and several times more durable. He has teeth that can bite limbs and heads off. A gorilla is stronger than a lion. But a lion will kill the gorilla just due to biting.