Zod vs Wonder Woman

Originally posted by abhilegend
this is your my default state, crying

Well said. 👆

Because between you and I, only one of us decided to repeatedly sh1t their diapers for 200+ posts across 10+ years while being ignored.

Being completely ashamed over your own decade-long+ b1tchmade posting history doesn't give you license to blame me for it.

Nobody forced you to make 200+ posts directly at me across 10+ years while being ignored.

Originally posted by ODG
Well said. 👆

Because between you and I, only one of us decided to repeatedly sh1t their diapers for 200+ posts across 10+ years while being ignored.

Being completely ashamed over your own decade-long+ b1tchmade posting history doesn't give you license to blame me for it.

Nobody forced you to make 200+ posts directly at me across 10+ years while being ignored.

Editing my posts lol.

Keep going, just a few more laughs for the day.

Originally posted by ODG
Do you want to be accurate or not?

So Superman koed Wonder Woman, yes? I mean, it seems all the quibbling you made didn't really change that.
How do you feel compared it to the Superman's scene
Like I said before

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
I personally think a panel that Superman kneels down on the ground, but then the following scenes he immediately gets up and shows no seriously affecting his capacity damage isn't an example I would call incapacitated

Because by the similar metrics. Wonder Woman is knocked out and she wakes up because the heat of the reentry, and even so, she still isn't getting up/standing up in at least 2 pages. I feel it also can be called incapacitated if we start to call the Superman's incapacitated

Originally posted by abhilegend
Editing my posts lol.

It's satire. Of you. At your expense. Given you are so utterly butthurt over me such that you were singularly compelled to chase for 200+ posts across 10+ years even though you knew you were on ignore.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
So Superman koed Wonder Woman, yes?

No. Unless you admit that Wonder Woman reduced Superman to being an utterly helplessly stuck pig on his knees wishing for mercy.

The genesis of our "debate" was whether Wonder Woman "incapacitated" Superman. But at every instance you were confounded by the clear presentation of the comics, you prevaricated and moved your own goalposts about being rendered "unconscious *for a while*" or "black[ing] out for an instant" as if that somehow were equivalent to being incapacitated.

You aren't stupid. Which is why I have little patience when you try to peddle your prevaricative bs. Given our past debates, you ought to know that I do not countenance wordplay semantics.

We both know what happened during the Sacrifice fight. You're just trying to wish it away with word-salad. At this point, your issue isn't with me, it's with the comics.

Originally posted by ODG
No. Unless you admit that Wonder Woman reduced Superman to being an utterly helplessly stuck pig on his knees wishing for mercy.

The genesis of our "debate" was whether Wonder Woman "incapacitated" Superman. But at every instance you were confounded by the clear presentation of the comics, you prevaricated and moved your own goalposts about being rendered "unconscious *for a while*" or "black[ing] out for an instant" as if that somehow were equivalent to being incapacitated.

You aren't stupid. Which is why I have little patience when you try to peddle your prevaricative bs. Given our past debates, you ought to know that I do not countenance wordplay semantics.

We both know what happened during the Sacrifice fight. You're just trying to wish it away with word-salad. At this point, your issue isn't with me, it's with the comics.

So a scene specifically states Diana is knocked out and she isn't moving for at least 2 pages isn't incapacitated
But a scene that shows Superman still much has his powers and isn't unconsciouns is somehow can be called incapacitated?
That sounds really double standards.

And judging by our past debates, I would say you are a...kind of tends to be stuck in your own personal opinions and rarely accepting/ignoring others' opinions.

Yes, we both know what happened during Sacrifice fight, and I would say what you said is something I wouldn't call incapacitated. That really isn't I have issue with comics, it's just it seems you like to twist the comics to suit your own views

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
So a scene specifically states Diana is knocked out and she isn't moving for at least 2 pages isn't incapacitated

Post the scene you are trying to twist beyond simple English comprehension. Because we both know the only scene you can post is the one where it explicitly states Diana blacks out for an instant.

I mean, when a comic book displays a flashback, do the smooth folds of your brain just instantly compress and short circuit, thus rendering the comic book non-canon due to your arbitrary 2-page limit?

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
But a scene that shows Superman still much has his powers and isn't unconsciouns is somehow can be called incapacitated?

If I b1tchslapped your ****-face (while I was holding back) such that you were reduced to being on your knees with your throat cut gurgling (while you were bloodlusted) but my attention was actually on a third party??? why yes, you'd be incapacitated.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
And judging by our past debates, I would say you are a...kind of tends to be stuck in your own personal opinions and rarely accepting/ignoring others' opinions.

Is this supposed to be some unironically ironic sh1t? Read the phucking comics. Yes, we both know what happened during the Sacrifice fight. If you didn't like it, that doesn't mean it didn't happen. It's on-panel. No matter how much it chafes your bleeding anus.

Originally posted by ODG
Post the scene you are trying to twist beyond simple English comprehension. Because we both know the only scene you can post is the one where it explicitly states Diana blacks out for an instant.

I mean, when a comic book displays a flashback, do the smooth folds of your brain just instantly compress and short circuit, thus rendering the comic book non-canon due to your arbitrary 2-page limit? If I b1tchslapped your ****-face (while I was holding back) such that you were reduced to being on your knees with your throat cut gurgling (while you were bloodlusted) but my attention was actually on a third party??? why yes, you'd be incapacitated. Is this supposed to be some unironically ironic sh1t? Read the phucking comics. Yes, we both know what happened during the Sacrifice fight. If you didn't like it, that doesn't mean it didn't happen. It's on-panel. No matter how much it chafes your bleeding anus.

Yeah, like I said, you're pretty much stuck with your own views and ignoring others' opinions.
That isn't just me saying that. I mean, even in this thread, DS pointed out this issue of yours

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Well I didn't think it was moronic. You are very hostile, and you are just ignoring my points to accuse me of misogyny without actually debating points, maybe because abhi isn't online for you to bounce off on.

I just don't want to interact with someone so angry, nor do I care for your reasons, really. This is meant to be fun, so if you find this to be fun and fulfilling in your life, go on ahead.

And I certainly isn't the one who first interprets the scene I posted as Diana gets koed

Originally posted by Smurph
Imo the more pertinent fact about the Sacrifice fight is that Wonder Woman gets knocked out in the first half of the fight. That's a forum loss.

In my view, we could quibble about Superman's mindset, but in any event, the fight isn't evidence of her beating Zod.

The reason that I made the point about same opponent comparisons is that I think you see that pattern throughout. She can get some damage in, but none of it seems to tip the balance her way.

So yeah, it seems you really need to get over with your own angry issue. I don't think there is any constructive discussion can be made here before you can get over with your own problems

Originally posted by ODG
It's satire. Of you. At your expense. Given you are so utterly butthurt over me such that you were singularly compelled to chase for 200+ posts across 10+ years even though you knew you were on ignore.

😂

You're fantasising of what I'm gonna say by editing my posts. Quite the obsession you got here.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Quite the obsession

laughcry