Originally posted by Robtard
Maul's going to be superior, he's going to put Cap on the ropes, but his cockiness and sloppiness will make him end up losing the fight. Source: The Phantom Menace#americawins
Ah you performed the woodchipper maneuver. Was I the first here to assert that a character's proven stupidity is in itself an anti-feat?
I would back you up on this if it wasn't for ESP. That Cap vs Cap battle in the last avengers movie wouldn't have lasted 5 seconds if one of them had esp.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
By getting killed again by the same guy?Sure, Jan.
We really gonna try and equate the guy he had an obsessed rage boner with for decades vs a guy he's never met and has no beef with? That's like me saying Cap would give Maul every chance to kill him and believe he wouldn't because that's what he did with Bucky.
^good point, but unnecessary.
indeed, maul died because he fought a better fighter and took the loss personally. that weakness can't be applied to every situation like a playable card
but maul wins anyway, even if he hypothetically had a rage boner for cap.
it's still esp vs non-esp. so unless cap attacked maul while he's taking a nap, it's not even a contest