Zod vs Wonder Woman

Started by darthgoober5 pages

Originally posted by abhilegend
So how's Mongul actually showing faster than Wonder Woman being scrutinised but not Wonder Woman being faster than Superman? Can it be that you're simply biased?

Gasp, no it can't be.


What are you talking about, WW/Supes has been scrutinized extensively. First you acted like Batman wasn't a credible source(before Mongul), then you acted like he was a credible source but said there was a recton, then you said Batman can be wrong... but only about WW/Supes. Keep on accusing others of bias 👆

A guy can be wrong about something but it doesn't mean he can't be right on another thing, though

Edit

Were those the long-promised scans 😂

Can't see Zod fighting like an out of control Superman (even if he did KO WW). Plus, his durability/damage soak looks better than Superman's, especially against piercing damage (when he fought with half of his head missing, or when he was fighting with a magical sword through his chest), anyway. Carver, is this the lifeline you want to cling to?

Originally posted by darthgoober
What are you talking about, WW/Supes has been scrutinized extensively. First you acted like Batman wasn't a credible source(before Mongul), then you acted like he was a credible source but said there was a recton, then you said Batman can be wrong... but only about WW/Supes. Keep on accusing others of bias 👆

Are you drunk or something? What are you babbling about? I simply asked you why you are scrutinising Batman's statement about Mongul (which you did) but not about Wonder Woman (which you didn't) in this very thread.

Do you want me to spell it out further?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Are you drunk or something? What are you babbling about? I simply asked you why you are scrutinising Batman's statement about Mongul (which you did) but not about Wonder Woman (which you didn't) in this very thread.

Do you want me to spell it out further?


I'm talking about your flip floppy nature in regards to any showing that DOESN'T somehow elevate Supes. I don't actually have an issue with Mongul. I take everything in comics with a grain of salt(both statements) anyway. And aside from that there's no contradiction since Batman made the distinction between travel speed and refex speed when he was talking to Supes and there was travel speed involved with Mongul.

Originally posted by darthgoober
I'm talking about your flip floppy nature in regards to any showing that DOESN'T somehow elevate Supes. I don't actually have an issue with Mongul. I take everything in comics with a grain of salt(both statements) anyway. And aside from that there's no contradiction since Batman made the distinction between travel speed and refex speed when he was talking to Supes and there was travel speed involved with Mongul.

Why are you lying so blatantly dude? Of course you have a problem with the Mongul scene as per your own post one page away.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Do you have any inducation that Mongul landing the shot first was a result of him being faster rather than because he was closer other than Batman's statement since Batman can be wrong?

When pointed out that all Diana has is a statement just like that, you responded with this post that Batman must have some evidence even though there's none.

Originally posted by darthgoober
He's Batman... yeah I generally feel he's studied up when he makes a definitive statement so I feel like he's probably seen evidence.

Who are you trying to fool here?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Why are you lying so blatantly dude? Of course you have a problem with the Mongul scene as per your own post one page away.

When pointed out that all Diana has is a statement just like that, you responded with this post that Batman must have some evidence even though there's none.

Who are you trying to fool here?


Of course... it's always everyone else who's lying Abhi... it's never you... and Supes is the best ever at everything.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Of course... it's always everyone else who's lying Abhi... it's never you... and Supes is the best ever at everything.

Again, who are you trying to fool here? The posts are right there for everyone to see.

Re: Zod vs Wonder Woman

Originally posted by Smurph
Since the previous thread was closed. Abhi, ODG, try to not shut this one down too.

Who's taking this? No BFR.

DC published a storyline showing a holding back Wonder Woman defeating a bloodlusted Superman.

Yes, Superman thought he was fighting Doomsday.

That actually should elevate Wonder Woman's performance because Superman would never attack Diana as fiercely as Doomsday but too many people are catastrophically butthurt over what actually happened on-panel to even acknowledge the obvious implications.

Insert Zod into Diana's position during Sacrifice. Or insert Zod into Superman's position.

Ya'll going to argue Zod performs better? Ok, mang, I haven't read every single DC comic and will never pretend that I have done so. So post the comics that prove such an assertion.

Originally posted by ODG
DC published a storyline showing a holding back Wonder Woman defeating a bloodlusted Superman.

Yes, Superman thought he was fighting Doomsday.

That actually should elevate Wonder Woman's performance because Superman would never attack Diana as fiercely as Doomsday but too many people are catastrophically butthurt over what actually happened on-panel to even acknowledge the obvious implications.

Insert Zod into Diana's position during Sacrifice. Or insert Zod into Superman's position.

Ya'll going to argue Zod performs better? Ok, mang, I haven't read every single DC comic and will never pretend that I have done so. So post the comics that prove such an assertion.


Still peddling the same BS after getting absolutely destroyed.

😂