Poll
19%
81%
1. Most likely Revan.
Revan was strong in the Force and possessed immense knowledge of the Sith Lore.
2. Giving a conclusion in this case is very difficult.
Both Count Dooku and Revan were skilled duelists, but we need to know a little more about Revan' skill with a Light saber.
3. Though Count Dooku will put up some fight, Revan will still win.
Revan was smarter and defeated Darth Malak on the Star Forge. And this is enough to put him above Count Dooku.
No one is underestimating Count Dooku. Despite certain (banned) individuals attempting to discredit the skill and proficiency of the Count of Serenno, Dooku ranks among the most powerful Jedi Masters in the history of the Jedi Order itself, he was regarded as the "the most bitter loss" of the Lost Twenty (to which the Complete Visual Dictionary cites is testament to his strength in the Force), and -- according to the Revenge of the Sith novelization -- an even greater Lord of the Sith. He would certainly prove to be a skilled challenge for Darth Revan.
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
revan... no this is not fanboyism... revan was a sith lord, Tyrranus was a sith apprentice.their titles say it all. I dont want to start a debate so I wont be on this thread. noobs.
Actually I believe both we called sith lords in the rule of two. Furthermore Dooku was the apprentice of one darth sidious who would beat down revan so there is no shame in being an apprentice to him. So Revan may still win but it is not because a title.
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
revan... no this is not fanboyism... revan was a sith lord, Tyrranus was a sith apprentice.their titles say it all. I dont want to start a debate so I wont be on this thread. noobs.
Your logic is extremely faulty. In case you didn't know, when a Sith apprentice is strong enough, he is supposed to challenge his master. Eventually, the Sith apprentice will surpass his master. If not, then he is not worthy of being his apprentice. Therefore, this has nothing to do with it.
Under Darth Bane's Rule of Two, both Sith Lords share the title of "Dark Lord of the Sith" -- the only titular difference is that the reigning Sith also possesses the title of 'Master'.
Superior rank -- especially when comparing two individuals from separate timeframes -- does not necessarily equate to superior skills.
OK,
I imagine this as a 60/40 fight in either direction.
Revan impresses with his Star Forge accomplishments and Dooku in taking on Anakin, Kenobi and Yoda.
I voted for Revan but on second thought I might have to give this to the Lord Count Dooku.
When in doubt it is good practice to bet against the ancients despite the ambiguous pattern of evolution in the Star Wars universe.
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
revan... no this is not fanboyism... revan was a sith lord, Tyrranus was a sith apprentice.their titles say it all. I dont want to start a debate so I wont be on this thread. noobs.
Another reason why this is flawed: they are from different time frames, they weren't around at the same time. If they were both Sith at the same time and Revan was Tyranus's master, then yes this logic would work. But by this logic Lord Kaan, who is a master, would be able to defeat Darth Vader, who is an apprentice. Which wouldn't happen, btw.
Force: Revan
Saber: Really really really close but Revan
Overall: Revan again
He'd win the saber battle because we've established that Dooku would lose to Malak (I think...somewhere although really closely, again) and if Revan can beat Malak we have the following equation:
Revan>Malak>Dooku
Overall, it's Revan, although quite closely. Please don't jump on me for saying Revan would win the saber fight! PLEASE!
Originally posted by caedusrulesall
Overall, it's Revan, although quite closely. Please don't jump on me for saying Revan would win the saber fight! PLEASE!
How can you expect us not to when Revan hasn't shown anything saber wise to take out Anakin "in TeH Zone" Skywalker in a saber duel.
He'd win the saber battle because we've established that Dooku would lose to Malak (I think...somewhere although really closely, again) and if Revan can beat Malak we have the following equation:
No what people though they established was malak>dooku overall (though i'm sure count makashi would prove that wrong if he posted here and im not sold on it either as im sure others are not) and Malak has shown even less than Revan saber wise so it truly makes me wonder what evidence is out there that puts Malak above Dooku.