Battlezone challenge: Star Trek vs. Star Wars

Started by quanchi11212 pages

Battlezone challenge: Star Trek vs. Star Wars

This will take place after Star Trek Beyond's film over the summer. It will be trilogy vs. trilogy. This challenge is first being extended to Darth Thor since he always acts like he could beat me in a one on one judged debate. I will be representing ONLY the NuTrek Trilogy while you have your choice of the Prequel trilogy or the Original trilogy. It'll be a space war with all characters from each trilogy only going to war.

I'm saying based off the interviews for Beyond and the sheer numbers of the NuFilm along with the other two films that they'd defeat either Wars trilogy in combat. I'm willing to debate this. Here is your chance to shut me up. Will anyone answer the bell here ?

Star Trek is the easy argument to make. Try graduating from difficulty level casual...

How about Kylo Ren vs Khan?

While I'm not aquitted to Nu Star Trek, I am under the impression that Star Trek carries better equipment in general as their fleets are more advanced and are better fit for warfare.

I pity those who accept such an unfair challenge.

The death star blows up planets with lone shot, I dunno any star trek ship that could do that

Oh god, reading this is so awkward...

Originally posted by steverules_2
The death star blows up planets with lone shot, I dunno any star trek ship that could do that

Yeah, but every Death Star has been pwned by ships that are incredibly inferior to the fleets Startrek has to offer. They are powerful but they are sitting ducks. The fact that they keep rebuilding the Death Star everytime should tell you how above average it is compared to conventional weaponry.

Can you even shield against teleporting in the SW universe?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh god, reading this is so awkward...

Originally posted by Firefly218
Star Trek is the easy argument to make. Try graduating from difficulty level casual...
Ask diehard Star Wars fans and they vehemently disagree. Nice to hear you agree with me though, kiddo.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ask diehard Star Wars fans and they vehemently disagree. Nice to hear you agree with me though, kiddo.

On movies only? That's one biased fan.

Originally posted by Bentley
On movies only? That's one biased fan.
3 vs 3. You throw Q in and they get stomped. I'm making this very fair and it's the point of comparing one trilogy vs the other. You're just some minor poster who shows up every week or so with a trollish comment. I'd never even consider you'd have the stones to do anything tbh.

Originally posted by quanchi112
3 vs 3. You throw Q in and they get stomped. I'm making this very fair and it's the point of comparing one trilogy vs the other. You're just some minor poster who shows up every week or so with a trollish comment. I'd never even consider you'd have the stones to do anything tbh.

Eh? I've challenged you to several (equally unfair 😛 ) battlezones in the past and you've never accepted. I won't say you're afraid though, maybe you're just lazy.

Me? I'm pretty lazy and I'm not going to watch sh_tty movies just to have you beaten. That's how evil wins.

Originally posted by Bentley
Eh? I've challenged you to several (equally unfair 😛 ) battlezones in the past and you've never accepted. I won't say you're afraid though, maybe you're just lazy.

Me? I'm pretty lazy and I'm not going to watch sh_tty movies just to have you beaten. That's how evil wins.

Have you even done a battlezone ?

I don't find them to be shitty but to each their own. Just grab your Pom Poms but you may be disappointed as I don't think Darth Thor would ever accept a judged debate between the two of us.

I'm awfully impatient with movies, so there is that.

I did a battlezone with PG and OV for the kicks a few years ago, but it was more of a amalgam-style match than an open debate to prove a point. Back then I had scans available and a smaller family, so it was easier to take time and set up arguments.

Originally posted by Bentley
I'm awfully impatient with movies, so there is that.

I did a battlezone with PG and OV for the kicks a few years ago, but it was more of a amalgam-style match than an open debate to prove a point. Back then I had scans available and a smaller family, so it was easier to take time and set up arguments.

Movies are by far the easiest battlezones especially when you compare them to comic book characters.

The first opportunity is for Darth Thor who talks a big game but when it comes down to it he actually backed down from a battlezone he accepted the day of when he knew the stips for months. Let's see if he accepts but my money is he runs because he doesn't believe himself to be a superior debater to me whatsoever.

Weird...

Originally posted by Bentley
While I'm not aquitted to Nu Star Trek, I am under the impression that Star Trek carries better equipment in general as their fleets are more advanced and are better fit for warfare.

This is the problem we always run into every time a SWvST thread pops up. There is no proper way to gague The Star Fleets capabilities against the combined efforts of the Star Wars universe, armada. Even if we were to agree for arguments sake that both sides functioned with the same type of shield calibrations, we would would have to then decide which classes of which ships would affect one another.

As far as firepower goes i think we have to assume that both sides are capable of equal or at least comparable offerings. Let's get the death Star out of the way right away. The Death Star isn't going to do dick against a space fleet. It can destroy planets at will but unless this is a question of whether or not the Star Fleet can stop the death Star before it's operational then it's not even worth arguing the power of the Death Star. Otherwise, i think it's fair to say that as long as a ship with comparable shield capabilities from either side is fighting the other then they are more than capable negating each other.

Next, lets look at speed and maneuverability of both sides ships.
On this topic i will have to, for the most part, defer to others for their knowledge of, Star Trek. My awareness stops with, The Next Generation. Although, i will say that i think the warp capabilities go to, Star Wars (even though that shouldn't matter much in this fight). Also, considering how incredible agile the Tie Fighters are, i also think they may have the edge in maneuverability.

Next, lets look at tech. The Star Fleet has cloaking capability and there is nothing to suggest, short of Jedi or Sith pilots to suggest that the Star Wars armada could actively defend against this. So i would give the edge to the Star Fleet but i do think the sheer numbers of the SW armada could just as easily over power, Star Fleet. I imagine only a handful of Star Fleet ships are outfitted with the arsenal to take on a Star Destroyer.

Darth Thor, do you accept ?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh god, reading this is so awkward...

Reading any VS thread is so awkward.

I'll do it.