Well, it looks like all you PS fanboys can shut up about the PS3 kicking 360's ass because it is so powerful:http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/617/617951p1.html
Once again, another prime example of Sony completly overexaggerating their product and underacheiving.
I could have said that.. but its honestly going to come down to who delivers good games.. I hope all the companies get on the ball.. this past generation (ps2/cube/box) just felt a little slow
Ps2: SSX
GC:Rogue Leader [Melee followed in December]
XBox:Halo
Then that was it until October 2001 when Ps2 put out GTA3, then GC & XBox were out in November. Then each year we were guaranteed a GTA for Ps2, except 2004 with the Double Pack. In 2001 the Jak & Daxter series bagan, & The Ratchet & Clank series, and Devil May Cry of course in October. In 2001 for GC was Eternal Darkness, and in 2002 we had the REmake, Resident Evil Zero, and Metroid Prime. 2003 was Wind Waker for GC, Manhunt for Ps2, etc. So yeah, it took time, they put alot of time inbetween their heavy hitters if you ask me. I obviously didn't go through the whole list, but you get an idea.
__________________ Feel free to shop at any T.J.Maxx other than mine.
oh yeah!!! even more so now that NONE of them are out, and you can NOT COMPARE them
"When you break down the numbers, Xbox 360 has provably more performance than PS3. Keep in mind that Sony has a track record of over promising and under delivering on technical performance. The truth is that both systems pack a lot of power for high definition games and entertainment.
However, hardware performance, while important, is only a third of the puzzle. Xbox 360 is a fusion of hardware, software and services. Without the software and services to power it, even the most powerful hardware becomes inconsequential. Xbox 360 games?by leveraging cutting-edge hardware, software, and services?will outperform the PlayStation 3."
so they are basically saying that 360 is better, then is provably better, but them saying saying they are the same "The truth is that both systems pack a lot of power for high definition games and entertainment." and them saying that power isn't everything, without software they're dead.... make up your own mind,will ya!!
this report is coming from Microsoft, of course they will say Xbox 1.5 is better, what makes me wanna laugh is that at the end they're not sure they will be better or not, they want power,and show you power, but did that power help them beat Sony in the last battle... no it didn't
what makes a console great is games, not power. while the only game that could help them launch 360 is halo 3. PS3 will have DMC 3, RE5, MGS4 and who knows what else
__________________
"When Gotham is ashes, you have my permission to die." -BANE
I agree, but I just got tired of all the PS fanboys bragging about the PS3's power and saying it was going to be so much better just because of that, despite the fact they say the exact opposite about PS2 and Xbox since the Xbox is much more powerful.
that's true, but I think what's happening now it's that many Xbox fanboy bragged about Xbox being so powerful and how it's (was) better than PS2 just because of that, now PS fanboys are having (or taking) their revenge .
but what really matters it's the gameplay, not graphics
on a side note, I don't give a damn about accessories, I think that's just dumb. they're good when they help you, but utterly ridiculous when they're needed for a game (when you can not play a game if you don't have that accessory). online on the other hand it's a different matter
__________________
"When Gotham is ashes, you have my permission to die." -BANE
Well, in that category the 360 will undoubtedly trump the PS3. I mean, Xbox already has around 2 million subscribers, and every single game is going to be made live aware, plus add to that a online marketplace. I mean, no matter what Sony does, Xbox is already so far ahead of everyone else for online gaming that it's going to be hard to beat them.
KMC Community Forums
May 21st, 2005 04:19 AM
