Odds are there are some who are not. But I’ve yet to meet one.
Using KMC as a micro-example, look how Trumpers are reacting towards last night’s election. Instead of taking a step back and using their huge losses in the House as a learning experience of “what did we do correct here; what did we do wrong?”, it’s sour grapes and they’re doubling down on their Trumper nonsense.
Why waste good scientific methods in proving whether peeps are manbabies? Is there a scientist around here that needs to eat so badly but finds no real job?
why not use scientific, and or social science, opinion, allegorical evidence etc. Is it more or less important to discuss than any other issue on this page? And what criteria would you use to decide importance? People get grants to discuss equally banal discussion points.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
My counter is that the things you say are utterly hilarious given your posting history.
You also whine and call correctly pointing out Dems will obstruct "sour grapes" lol. Do better.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I'm not a Trumper, I didn't even vote and have no intention of voting next time either. If someone had held a gun to my head and made me choose between him and Hilary I would have voted for him, but I don't really believe in trying to chose between the lesser of two evils. I have no problem criticizing Republicans when they act loudly stupid or hypocritical, it's just that Dems seem to worse about it nowadays(especially in regards to hypocrisy).
'
Hey I disagree, but I understand that you like to lump people into your preferred categories and ignore the nuance of any particular situation so feel free. Ironically it's a trait you share with Trump lol