Hahahahaha. Good one, sevenchild. You have prooved again what childish and inmature you are. I have never seen a so big bunch of insults in a thread. Really, to discuss with a guy who isnt capable of post something without childish insults is totally impossible. The discussion is totally dead because you killed it with your behaving. It would be good if some moderator take a look here. For my part, this issue is finished. But i want to clear some points before:
I didnt like the schumacher movies. I hated batman forever and batman and robin. But i hated too batman and batman returns. I think that the only good batman film is batman begins.
And a advice for you, big seveman: if you arent incapable of controlling yourself, you have a serious problem here. We arent talking about your family or your friends, only about movies and cinema actors and directors. Relax, big boy, its only a forum. By for the moment.
__________________ The beatles, best group ever.
John Lennon, Musical genius of all time
Helen Mirren and Julie Christie , most lovely british actresses of all time.
Re: If BATMAN FOREVER Was Directed By Tim Burton As The Final BATMAN Movie
No, it would not..
For one, Batman would become a musical..
Secondly it would either be done in claymation or Jonny Depp would become Batman. The latter will kill us all..
Thirdly, being the "final Batman movie" and knowing Tim Burton like I do, you can expect on the soundtrack as one of the hit singles Spice Girl's "goodbye my friend" when Ginger left the group.
And fourth, just because he's big on the whole "dead" thing, he wouldn't stick to traditional Batman villains and depict Batman having to battle Solemon Grundy..
Actually that would be sevenman that has very little taste.Yeah I am backing off from this argument because sevenman is clearly living in denial that burtons batman movies totally butchered to death his character making him into a cowardly killer,plus he seems to have all day at home to do nothing but get on the internet and post messages.I dont have that kind of time to go read through all these insane ludicrise novels he writes so yes I am backing off this argument because like you said,this discussion has just turned into two little 12 year olds saying my daddy is better than your daddy,you suck,blah blah,blah.I am not going to participate in that kind of discussion.
Yeah Pimp,listen to bakerboy.Dont play his game,if he just wants to insult and act childish,just let him talk to himself.He is clearly on here just seeking attention so dont play his game by responding to his insane ludicrise ramblings.Let him go on and keep making himself look stupid like he has throughout this thread,he's not worth the time.
His arguments are laughable anyways that the movie had any realisem in it anyways because as he is living in denial about,a realistic batman movie would have had the cops after him for murder of the joker and his goons at the end,regardless of their past actions,batman is not authorized by the police to go out and kill criminals like he did.Thats why batman begins rocks because it HAD realisem in it.Such as batman being wanted by the cops and being chased by the cops-the commissioner saying-Nobody takes the law into their own hands in my town.Plus as any true batman fan would know,Keaton was laughable as bruce wayne because he didnt even come close to fitting the role so because of that he brought no credibility to it.I remember people leaving the thaters back then outraged making comments like-man michael keaton sucked,he did not even look the role of bruce wayne,this movie sucked.Proof that keaton was a horrible choice. casting keaton for batman was like casting Burt reynolds in the new dukes of hazzard movie.a total joke because Reynolds doesnt even fit the role of Boss Hogg.same difference with keaton as batman.some people like sevenman live in denial about that though.
as I said earlier,the ONLY Batman movie made that was loyal to the comicbook is BATMAN BEGINS.thats it.
Last edited by Mr Parker on Aug 28th, 2005 at 08:43 PM
yeah thats laughable that he says batman needs to kill to be a dark hero or an outcast.Yeah if he was a killer,he would be as bad as his parents killer.no better.yeah those are great points why there is no realisem in burtons batman movies.yep tim burtons batman movies were just like most of his movies,unrealistic and weird.I like some of burtons movies such as edward scissorhands and ed wood,those were good quality movies,but batman and batman returns clearly were not.and actually bakerboy,batman did carry a gun in the beginning but thats how burtons batman movies betray the comic because in burtons batman movie he did not have a gun and by the time batman stopped carrying a gun in the comics,thats when he stopped killing and even when he did kill in the comics in the beginning it was only because of what i said earlier which was that he only does so when his life is in danger and no way out,he doesnt kill people in cowardly ways when its not unnessary like he did in burtons batman movies.
Last edited by Mr Parker on Aug 28th, 2005 at 09:01 PM
Yeah thats pretty funny bakerboy that he thinks he is a true batman fan when as you know,any true batman fan would not accept those horrible Tim Burton Batman movies and would hate all four of those bad batman movies made in the 90's and in 89.well said there. yeah batman begins is the ONLY true and loyal batman movie made as any true batman fan would know.burton made another movie about another characte,that wasnt batman.yeah like you said,that would be like making a spiderman movie with a guy is 60 years old,thats not a spiderman movie,same thing with batman.batmna isnt a guy who is a wuss that cant even beat one guy,is fat bald and out of shape,thats another character,thats not batman.the burton and schumacher batman movies were phony neautered versions just like you said.once again,very well spoker bakerboy.yeah batman could have beat that guy in 10 seconds or less if he wanted to,burton just made him into a wuss and that was inexcusable,he clearly does not understand batmans character like nolan did.thats why batman forever isnt near as bad as batman 89,at least schumacher did not make him into a wuss and cast someone who at least looks like bruce wayne and behaves like him.
yeah his arguments are false and laughable and not worth reading anymore.they are just a bunch of false lond winded novels with no credibility so they are not worth reading through anymore.we have disproven him countless of times here.no sense in keep playing his game by responding to his long insane posts anymore.
I believe batman 89 should of been called the joker because i thought jack nickolsan was great definetly cant say the same for batman in that movie.I dont know why people liked keaton and probably never will i mean he played beetlejuice that should tell you he wasnt good for bruce wayne.Batman returns wasnt bad but it also wasnt great Dany Devito was great for pingwen but they should of made him more of a pimp than a sewer rat.I loved batman forever and B&R was ok just ok not good or great so please dont get that mixed up and i was playing when i said B&R is better than BB, BB was a great movie but they could of done better with the scarecrow i mean he got beat by a damn tazer!Also im confused with BB which was the real ra's al gul the bald one or the one with hair?I pretty much like all the batman movies.
Right on my foe.You are so correct there.Thats exactly what batman 89 SHOULD have been called is The Joker.I mean for god sakes,the movie was all about The Joker with jack nicholson having the majority of the screentime and Batman having just a supporting role in it.Jack was a good joker but Keaton was definetly not a good Batman.I wouldnt say so much that because he played Beeteljuice that he should not have been cast for Batman,just that he didnt even come close to fitting the role.I can only say it so many times that that was the same as casting Burt Reynolds for the role of Boss Hogg in the dukes of hazzard.Insane and ludicrise because reynolds did not even come close to fitting the role so in both cases,neither actor brought any credibiltiy to their roles.The Keaton and burton apologists never will understand that though.keaton has been good in some other movies before such as jack Frost and desperate measures but he was clearly not the right choice for batman and was miscast in that role.Really the ONLY good thing that Burton did right in those movies was getting Danny Elfman to do the theme song and kim basinger and michelle phieffer,they were the ONLY good things about those movies.again I am very thankful that scumacher came along because he at least when he cast Kilmer,he cast someone aho at least came close to fitting the role and did not like like a wuss in a fight with goons and plus the special effects like the bat tunnel kilmer went through,the bat boat and the batplane were pretty damn cool.much cooler than any of the effects from the burton batman movies.Glad to hear you were just joking about batman and robin being better than batman begins.you had me worried there on that one.
I remember the theme song in 89 batman, i loved it! one of my favorite parts is at the end of batman 89 when hes on the edge of the building and the music is playing and the batsighnal was right next to him, i wish they had a poster of thatThey should of had that same music in BB!
I am sick and tired of this arguing about the same damn thing! Kilmer sucked as Batman, Keaton was a pretty bad Wayne. DEAL WITH IT! That's why you "physical apperance is more important than acting ability" people have Bale and Kilmer to drool on.