Gender: Male Location: US
Currently: Eating chicken?
Um...yes you did.
And no offense to Grand, but he's not quite responsible enough to moderate the forum. Even if he was, he isn't really on enough.
Anyhoo, on topic....
That's true. Anything will move in zero gravity. Stars aren't caught well by cameras. However, I doubt that the filming of the landing occured on the moon. I do, however, think they landed on it.
Seriously people, TKOK, you could have just left it and said nothing, your comment was unnecessary and it is clear you where trying to be snide and get a hit in at Ashtar, but were also trying to cover yourself by posting on-topic at the same time, Ashtar, you took the bait and kept it going, you two are going to get yourselves in alot of trouble!
Anywhoo
Thats an interesting theory TKOK, that the filmed pre/post being on the moon...never thought of that. But wouldn't the Russians have a way of detecting wherever America got to the moon or not?
sorry, I'm a blunt person. I do not mince words nor do I attempt to dance around truths to spare one's feelings. If somebody gets their feelings hurt because I flat out tell them they do not have any knowledge on the subject they are attempting to discuss and are impeding the discussion of us that do, they ought to either leave the topic or research the topic to gain knowledge before posting again.....so be it.
I come to this forum, the philosophy forum and religion forum to have discussions on topics......and debate differing views. If somebody get's their feelings hurt because they are told their view has no merit as they have no knowledge on the subject, basing their view on completely wrong assumptions contrary to fact.......let them go cry to their mommy.
The solution is simple. Actually do a little research, educate yourself on any given topic you choose to post about before you ever put your finger to keyboard the first time.
Gender: Male Location: US
Currently: Eating chicken?
It is possible, but I doubt it.
They could've also filmed it on earth, sent them to the moon, and broadcasted the recording whilst they were on the moon. Meaning they could get around the whole "detection" thing. But I really don't know.
I work for a company here in the UK and one of our biggest customers is Lockheed Martin. who made the Apollo rockets and have just won the gig for the next Moon craft. These guys are so anal that there's no way they could be part of a conspiracy and trust everyone to keep their mouths shut about it. Trust me, I deal with Lockheed Martin every day and they ruin my day. Every day.
__________________
Post in the Indiana Jones forum.
I may not be well-versed upon the complexities of the effect of burning fuel upon carbon in zero-atmosphere environments... but where was the Blast crater underneath the Eagle lunar lander? even if it couldn't blacken the soft soil then there had to have been a crater from the stabilizers and the counter-thrust rockets on the lander itself?
All pictures of the direct feed show crisp clean moon-soil unerneath it...
I'm perplexed on just how one might explain something like that...
__________________ Mal: "Well, if anyone gets nosey... You know... Shoot em' "
The lander was on minimal thrust at the point it landed and the pressure being generated was only about one and a half pounds per square inch, which is barely enough to leave a small dent. Furthermore, exhaust dissipates almost immediately in a vacuum- it is the atmosphere on Earth that forces exhaust into a column that might cause a crater.
So twice over, there is no reason for there to be one.
__________________
"We've got maybe seconds before Darth Rosenberg grinds everybody into Jawa burgers and not one of you buds has the midi-chlorians to stop her!"
KMC Community Forums
Aug 19th, 2006 10:43 PM
