KMC Forums

 
  REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Already a member? Log-in!
 
 
Home » Star Wars » Star Wars: TV Series » What character is do you want inlcuded the most?


What character is do you want inlcuded the most?
Started by: Elite Hunter

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (12): « First ... « 9 10 [11] 12 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
queeq
Chaos

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: JP's bed

Moderator


 

Maybe... i think it's lame though.


__________________

Old Post Apr 24th, 2008 06:42 PM
Click here to Send queeq a Private Message Find more posts by queeq Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
exanda kane
Senior Member

Registered: May 2005
Location: Norwich, England


 

Who said it wasn't?


__________________


Bravely Calling Actors By Their Second Names

Old Post Apr 24th, 2008 06:59 PM
Click here to Send exanda kane a Private Message Find more posts by exanda kane Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
queeq
Chaos

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: JP's bed

Moderator


 

Some people seemed to like it.


__________________

Old Post Apr 25th, 2008 02:20 PM
Click here to Send queeq a Private Message Find more posts by queeq Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
chik4lit
Senior Member

Registered: Mar 2008
Location: United States


 

It'll make for an interesting dynamic within the the TV series, it kind of screws the whole thing.

Old Post Apr 26th, 2008 01:26 AM
Click here to Send chik4lit a Private Message Find more posts by chik4lit Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
queeq
Chaos

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: JP's bed

Moderator


 

We had a lot of that in the PT already.


__________________

Old Post Apr 26th, 2008 08:34 AM
Click here to Send queeq a Private Message Find more posts by queeq Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
exanda kane
Senior Member

Registered: May 2005
Location: Norwich, England


 

I'm curious about it, because the news seems like it has done precisely what it was meant to. As I said though, it feels blatantly obvious that it is a gimmick, and probably one that will not live up to its expectations, a la Darth Maul, Grievous and others.


__________________


Bravely Calling Actors By Their Second Names

Old Post Apr 26th, 2008 12:24 PM
Click here to Send exanda kane a Private Message Find more posts by exanda kane Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Ordo
Enforcer of the Republic

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Kamino Boot Camp


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by exanda kane
I'm curious about it, because the news seems like it has done precisely what it was meant to. As I said though, it feels blatantly obvious that it is a gimmick, and probably one that will not live up to its expectations, a la Darth Maul, Grievous and others.


Come on and pull your head out of your arse.

You're comparing a charaters that were on screen for 15 minutes of one film vs a character that will likely be in action for 20 hours (thats only about half...and likely an undersetimate) of a 100episode TV series + film.

You OT mongers should crawl back in your holes and go back to 1983. We'd all enjoy that very much. Quit your pointless speculative bitching and reconsider your baises.


__________________


| Sigs | My Artwork | Sig Duel Record 24:4 | Alliance Respect Thread |

Old Post Apr 26th, 2008 05:59 PM
Click here to Send Ordo a Private Message Find more posts by Ordo Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
exanda kane
Senior Member

Registered: May 2005
Location: Norwich, England


 

All well and good of you to be a complete lemon about the situation Alliance, but your dodgy rhetoric is a little less Charlton Heston and a little more Chevy Chase; you're coming across as much more of a crazed delinquent than is fair for you. The cause of this riotous outburst? No sex! But the "cause" of this riotous outburst? Hmm, you have lost me there Patrick Kielty. The similar use of those characters in the promotion of their respective products is pretty obvious for anyone with an IQ above 75. It isn't implicit or written in brail or only visible in the Witching Hour you daft fishmonger, it's obvious. When did Darth Maul and Grievous not become a gimmick? Hell, are you even too much of a Kielty to realise that Star Wars is built on gimmicks and hooks? Probably - Where as the title scrawl and the John Williams Crescendo have longetivity, the said characters fell flat as soon as you watched the film. No substance, no character, no killer. Who is to say what is to happen with this new gimmick? Will she stay or will she go? If you really want to go with the cop-out "Big Bad People With Their Common Sense Hurt Alliance's Ears With Their Views On The Prequels" line, then go for it; you little pocketfisherman you.

Of course, your EgoDrivenIdiocyCanKiss my chumbabwamba kiddo.


__________________


Bravely Calling Actors By Their Second Names

Old Post Apr 26th, 2008 07:13 PM
Click here to Send exanda kane a Private Message Find more posts by exanda kane Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Ordo
Enforcer of the Republic

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Kamino Boot Camp


 

Common sense is something you demonstrate little of. Your big bad stream of consciousness blathering is typical of someone with the inability to extend their insight past their own nose.

SW is built on gimmicks and hooks. It always has been. Thus, when your mental worms come slithering out of their holes to escape the flood of your intellectual oppression and make the blinding revelation that indeed, a new character might be used extensively in advertising....Praise be to Jesus.

Yet, perhaps the worm, before drowning or getting smashed beneath the black boot of insight, would manage to make the elementary distinction between a new cornerstone of personal development and the episodic villain of the week, who for all intents and purposes in the "blatant black and white nature of Star Wars" needs neither background nor depth, simply evilness. Thus, perhaps the tiny worm would be able, given the pervasiveness of gimmick in Star Wars, to distinguish between different types of gimmicks and make accurate comparisons between the two.

Lucas? Use marketing. For everything? BRILLIANT!
(for a four year old)

Yet, Ashoka will not fall flat because she is an integral part of the saga and a main vehicle of the audience's point of view. This interaction also takes place over a span easily 10-20 times the screen time she would have received in the films with her stature, which is probably 5 times more than Maul or Grievous received. A character falling flat is dependant on their treatment in the film, not in how that character is marketed prior to it. Any Dolly can make this distinction and frankly if you had any common sense, you could move beyond that simple distinction.

So, go wrap yourself in childhood nostalgia, pretending that SW once consisted of only good films that were immune to the "flaws" of the PT.


__________________


| Sigs | My Artwork | Sig Duel Record 24:4 | Alliance Respect Thread |

Old Post Apr 26th, 2008 07:34 PM
Click here to Send Ordo a Private Message Find more posts by Ordo Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
exanda kane
Senior Member

Registered: May 2005
Location: Norwich, England


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Alliance
Common sense is something you demonstrate little of. Your big bad stream of consciousness blathering is typical of someone with the inability to extend their insight past their own nose.


Oh no Mr.Paxman, please put the cross back in its place! Don't confuse yourself with people that can be illustrious and demonstrative in their own expression, because you ain't got no nollerin' credibility in that game jimmymedladle. I-I-ii Can only 'ope you 'ave the sense to slay your own crown.

quote:
SW is built on gimmicks and hooks. It always has been.


Jokes to the last Superhans.

quote:
Thus, when your mental worms come slithering out of their holes to escape the flood of your intellectual oppression and make the blinding revelation that indeed, a new character might be used extensively in advertising....Praise be to Jesus.


Oh woe for the prose! Oh how you elope your fleshy swab upon your crown and blow like the winds of a Vespa. Oh woe how you might 'mispaken' alike Hilary, to kill an argument with your own flesh swab of a criticism - that Kielty, is what you have done. There is a point where your caged wisdom feeds upon its own behind and that for you, was the zenith; advertising without representation! Marketing department clogging their own rectums with promotion without representation! A new character unveiled as an advertising tool is a double edged sword. No questions. Feed the prols with their own squalor for Alliance has stolen their bread and fuelled his Sarcasm Corbopoly Enterprise and drowned like Northern Rock.

quote:
A character falling flat is dependant on their treatment in the film, not in how that character is marketed prior to it. .


Promotion with Representation! Kid Sampson packs his bags! The keystone of this bridge of plenty: Reception of Promotion! Not Reception of Product! Reception of Promotion! There are no two types of gimmick, pisspants, when considering the Promotion in the sense that you and your phallic worm are doing. Fleshy swab. A character falling flat is dependant on how their treament in the film reflects with the marketing of their character in ecent Star Wars. It will be the same for this bint.

quote:
So, go wrap yourself in childhood nostalgia, pretending that SW once consisted of only good films that were immune to the "flaws" of the PT.


Correction Kielty; there are only two good Star Wars films and whether they are new are old is simply moot.


__________________


Bravely Calling Actors By Their Second Names

Last edited by exanda kane on Apr 26th, 2008 at 08:26 PM

Old Post Apr 26th, 2008 08:18 PM
Click here to Send exanda kane a Private Message Find more posts by exanda kane Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Mandrag Ganon
Seeker

Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Living my life, fighting my war.


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by exanda kane
All well and good of you to be a complete lemon about the situation Alliance, but your dodgy rhetoric is a little less Charlton Heston and a little more Chevy Chase; you're coming across as much more of a crazed delinquent than is fair for you. The cause of this riotous outburst? No sex! But the "cause" of this riotous outburst? Hmm, you have lost me there Patrick Kielty. The similar use of those characters in the promotion of their respective products is pretty obvious for anyone with an IQ above 75. It isn't implicit or written in brail or only visible in the Witching Hour you daft fishmonger, it's obvious. When did Darth Maul and Grievous not become a gimmick? Hell, are you even too much of a Kielty to realise that Star Wars is built on gimmicks and hooks? Probably - Where as the title scrawl and the John Williams Crescendo have longetivity, the said characters fell flat as soon as you watched the film. No substance, no character, no killer. Who is to say what is to happen with this new gimmick? Will she stay or will she go? If you really want to go with the cop-out "Big Bad People With Their Common Sense Hurt Alliance's Ears With Their Views On The Prequels" line, then go for it; you little pocketfisherman you.

Of course, your EgoDrivenIdiocyCanKiss my chumbabwamba kiddo.



quote: (post)
Originally posted by exanda kane
Oh no Mr.Paxman, please put the cross back in its place! Don't confuse yourself with people that can be illustrious and demonstrative in their own expression, because you ain't got no nollerin' credibility in that game jimmymedladle. I-I-ii Can only 'ope you 'ave the sense to slay your own crown.



Jokes to the last Superhans.



Oh woe for the prose! Oh how you elope your fleshy swab upon your crown and blow like the winds of a Vespa. Oh woe how you might 'mispaken' alike Hilary, to kill an argument with your own flesh swab of a criticism - that Kielty, is what you have done. There is a point where your caged wisdom feeds upon its own behind and that for you, was the zenith; advertising without representation! Marketing department clogging their own rectums with promotion without representation! A new character unveiled as an advertising tool is a double edged sword. No questions. Feed the prols with their own squalor for Alliance has stolen their bread and fuelled his Sarcasm Corbopoly Enterprise and drowned like Northern Rock.



Promotion with Representation! Kid Sampson packs his bags! The keystone of this bridge of plenty: Reception of Promotion! Not Reception of Product! Reception of Promotion! There are no two types of gimmick, pisspants, when considering the Promotion in the sense that you and your phallic worm are doing. Fleshy swab. A character falling flat is dependant on how their treament in the film reflects with the marketing of their character in ecent Star Wars. It will be the same for this bint.



Correction Kielty; there are only two good Star Wars films and whether they are new are old is simply moot.



I see you stick to throwing insults with no real arguments. Not good for arguments but exelent for entertainment.

*gets popcorn*

please continue.


__________________

Old Post Apr 27th, 2008 03:09 AM
Click here to Send Mandrag Ganon a Private Message Find more posts by Mandrag Ganon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Ordo
Enforcer of the Republic

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Kamino Boot Camp


 

^^^ Thats my impression.


__________________


| Sigs | My Artwork | Sig Duel Record 24:4 | Alliance Respect Thread |

Old Post Apr 27th, 2008 05:36 AM
Click here to Send Ordo a Private Message Find more posts by Ordo Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
exanda kane
Senior Member

Registered: May 2005
Location: Norwich, England


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Kapton JAC
I see you stick to throwing insults with no real arguments. Not good for arguments but exelent for entertainment.

*gets popcorn*

please continue.


Now that is just egotistical of you to think I would dick on your own style Cameron. Remember, you're the one with no argument; remember, the part where you got all gooey "down there" when you were told that Jedi are as important as Linux? Oh, those were the days.

As for Alliance, no need for you to break a sweat spewing forth your planned mantra (show me a brief and I'll think you're an artist) - as said, this is a nicely marketed trick to spark interest in a pseudo-Star Wars movie. Whether you compare the bint to other failed characters or not, the so called "dynamic" between said bint and known Gallagher, Anakin, has been pushed as the only reason why this film must be seen. I hate to think you'd be couped up thinking otherwise with your little worm.


__________________


Bravely Calling Actors By Their Second Names

Old Post Apr 27th, 2008 02:24 PM
Click here to Send exanda kane a Private Message Find more posts by exanda kane Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
queeq
Chaos

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: JP's bed

Moderator


 

Keep it civilised, guys. One can use proper arguments in a debate.


__________________

Old Post Apr 27th, 2008 05:36 PM
Click here to Send queeq a Private Message Find more posts by queeq Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Mandrag Ganon
Seeker

Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Living my life, fighting my war.


 

quote: (post)
Originally posted by exanda kane
Now that is just egotistical of you to think I would dick on your own style Cameron. Remember, you're the one with no argument; remember, the part where you got all gooey "down there" when you were told that Jedi are as important as Linux? Oh, those were the days.


That argument was an argument with no actual proof being presented on either side, just opinions and speculation. Through that exchange, I realised that there is no way that we will ever KNOW what Star Wars would be without the Jedi, Sith, Force, etc. but my belief has never changed.

Where my arguments have had little proof and been strongly opinionated (something that I am slowly trying to remedy) yours consist of little proof and much mud slinging. This is a fact. Through watching your posts I have come to see that you thrive on going to forums that you care little about, and causing conflict whenever you can in said forums. It is, as I have witnessed several times, a lamentable character trait of yours.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by queeq
Keep it civilised, guys. One can use proper arguments in a debate.


My apologies, but sometimes what must be stated must be stated, even if you tread on a few toes.


__________________

Last edited by Mandrag Ganon on Apr 28th, 2008 at 01:46 AM

Old Post Apr 28th, 2008 01:40 AM
Click here to Send Mandrag Ganon a Private Message Find more posts by Mandrag Ganon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
queeq
Chaos

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: JP's bed

Moderator


 

Treading on toes is no problem, using abusive language to do that is.


__________________

Old Post Apr 28th, 2008 09:14 AM
Click here to Send queeq a Private Message Find more posts by queeq Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Mandrag Ganon
Seeker

Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Living my life, fighting my war.


 

How do you define abusive?


__________________

Old Post Apr 28th, 2008 04:52 PM
Click here to Send Mandrag Ganon a Private Message Find more posts by Mandrag Ganon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
queeq
Chaos

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: JP's bed

Moderator


 

When I say it is.


__________________

Old Post Apr 28th, 2008 06:00 PM
Click here to Send queeq a Private Message Find more posts by queeq Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
exanda kane
Senior Member

Registered: May 2005
Location: Norwich, England


 

Yeahhh!

But if Kapton JAC would like to resurrect his poor arguments for that thread, I would be simply obliged - so what if he couldn't lead a logical invesitgation of relevant questions relating to said debate, he tried! - but until then, Xrotom to you.


__________________


Bravely Calling Actors By Their Second Names

Old Post Apr 28th, 2008 06:17 PM
Click here to Send exanda kane a Private Message Find more posts by exanda kane Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Mandrag Ganon
Seeker

Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Living my life, fighting my war.


 

I repeat: Where my arguments have had little proof and been strongly opinionated (something that I am slowly trying to remedy) yours consist of little proof and much mud slinging. This is a fact.


__________________

Old Post Apr 28th, 2008 06:51 PM
Click here to Send Mandrag Ganon a Private Message Find more posts by Mandrag Ganon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 08:57 PM.
Pages (12): « First ... « 9 10 [11] 12 »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< Contact Us - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Forum powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.