Yea, he saw her pulling the trigger and was able to predict the bullets path because he saw where the gun was pointed.
Thanks for agreeing with me.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
You basically ignored what I said. This is trolling.
The bullet's travel time is about 0.01 based off the speed of an actual bullet from that gun and the distance the gun was away from Ozy.
0.4 s would make the bullet a little faster than a fastball in baseball and not a real bullet. Plus we all know that you need to move faster than.0.4 s to catch a bullet. The guy is an actor, so his speed is not the speed of the story.
No. As I explained (what you missed) he didn't move when she was pulling the trigger. He moved after the gun was fired and the bullet was already flying through the air. He reacted to the shot (bullet), not to the trigger press.
So you're claiming that Ozy didn't see the trigger pull or where the gun was pointed?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
This is fiction. Ozy doesn't exist. The actor looked toward the camera.
And in the story (in the writer's mind) Ozy didnt look at the trigger press because a slow motion closeup to her pulling the trigger wasn't shown (to get the audience to know that Ozy was looking at the trigger pull for timing). That defeats your argument.
But for unnecessary extra info
Theoretically, if Ozy existed (and the writer showed him in slow motion looking at the trigger pull) then he still reacted off the bullet. Otherwise, he has 0.005s timing (which gives slow motion perceptions) and superspeed or he would have moved the moment she started pulling the trigger instead of waiting until the bullet entered the air to first move.
And again, a being cant move their hand faster than what the brain can perceive due to the brain moving and guiding the limb.
In other words, Ozy hand moved about the speed of the bullet. His brain guided the hand the whole way.
If Ozy wasn't looking at the gun, how is it that he was able to see the bullet come out of the gun?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
So how do you explain someone being able to catch a bullet at point blank range and after it is fired to not have superhuman level speed and reflexes?
If you agree that Ozy has this then you should agree that it's impossible for Cap to tag him moving far slower than a bullet.
Ozy simultaneously beat two MA that are arguably visually as fast as Cap.
For Cap to beat Ozy he has to tag him. How do you explain tagging a person with 0.005s reaction times, can move at super speed, and is a supreme master of fighting skill?
You didn't rule out anything, you just claimed that Ozy wasn't looking at the gun. a claim that you provided no proof for.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
So now you're claiming that he was looking at the gun, but somehow couldn't see the trigger?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
It's called focus. You can focus on a circular area that contains the shooter's face, shooter's chest, and gun as a whole without focusing on the trigger finger.
You are claiming that Ozy focused solely on the nozzle's direction and her trigger finger, when this is certainly not true.
If Ozy's focus was so spread out that he missed the movement of her pulling the trigger, plus the movement of both the hammer and cylinder. how did he manage to see the bullet like you're claiming?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
He saw the bullet come out of the gun at slow motion, focused in on it and caught it.
Remember, he reacted to the bullet in the air, not the trigger press as I explained.
If his focus was good enough to see a bullet moving, how could he miss the trigger pull, and the movement of both the hammer and cylinder?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
You are begging the question (circular reasoning). You are assuming that he must be focused on the hammer, cylinder, and trigger pull in order to spot the bullet coming out in order to prove he was focused on the hammer, cylinder, and trigger pull. In other words, you are assuming what you are trying to prove.
Most of his focus could be on the gun in general, nothing specific. He sees the gun fire and the bullet come out, he acts. Not rocket science.
KMC Community Forums
Jan 25th, 2020 08:36 PM
2 spellcasters are better than 1
