Let me put it to you this way: If you're a racecar driver driving at 100 mph and you see a curve coming up, you can easily steer through the curve. Why? because you're the one in control of your movement. You know which direction you're moving in, you have control to fine tune your acceleration, speed and movements to make sure you make the turn. You are allowed to prepare for the movement.
In comparison, if you're standing in the middle of the track and a car comes around the corner and comes at you at 100 mph, you're going to have a very hard time dodging. You have no control over its speed and direction. And since you didn't instigate the movement, you are unable to properly gauge just how fast it is going in relation to you. And since you're not controlling the movement, you are also unable to properly prepare for the event.
Supergirl flying around and not hitting her head is way way different from dodging out of the way of a fast moving flying object.
Too bad this isn't a weightlifting contest. As this is a fight, we're going to base it off of Supergirl's fight feats... or are you saying we should completely disregard all of her fighting feats?
Sure I do. Supergirl has feats far outside of Thor's capabilities to match, and these characters have caused her far more trouble than Thor would. Ergo, they'd casually shitstomp Thor.
They just find it hard to believe that their big blonde beefcake Norse husbando would get his ass casually beat by not only Supergirl, but by her random monsters of the week.
So let me get this straight. I point out that Supergirl has lifting feats greater than Thor but not fighting feats. You postulate that the foes she fought could beat Thor in a fight. I ask you to prove it and your proof is... that Supergirl has good lifting feats? Because she certainly doesn't have fighting feats better than Thor's.
You can't use the argument in question as the proof for that same argument.
Here's my counter proof: You can visually see how much faster, more fluid, more skilled and more powerful Thor moves in a fight as compared to majority of the mooks that give Supergirl trouble.
Jobbing for the sake of the storyline doesn't transfer over into Vs matches where the players (unless otherwise stated) are both at their best shown performances.
Comic Flash has multiple FTL feats, Deathstroke has multiple feats of landing hits/attacks on Flash, ergo Deathstroke is FTL.
Is this really the argument people want to use?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Supergirl has more than enough power, speed, and versatility to take on all the Avengers let alone Thor: I don't think anyone would argue against this point.
The problem stems from Supergirl being just as inept as she is power. Granted something may have happened over the course of her show this season to prove otherwise, and if so I'd eat crow, but I still hold to the opinion that Thor would win.
If someone is strong and durable enough to lift, hold and manipulate two billion pounds with a single hand, they don't have to be the best fighters to win against someone who is ridiculously below them.
eg MCU Hawkeye is a more skilled fighter than MCU Hulk. But he's not taking out Hulk 1v1
We argue in character, so no. the Flash wouldn't FTL punch Deathstroke into mist. not unless CIS was removed or bloodlust was added.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
This is true, in character, TV Barry would just run back in time and f*ck things up for everyone else.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Do you have proof that God takes away Supergirl's physical strength in fights?
It's simple powerscaling lad, try to keep up.
Fighting feats like what? Looking REALLY REALLY cool when he fights? Lmao.
Ah so you're accusing me of using circular reasoning. You have a very poor understanding of the term then.
Circular reasoning is when one's premise and argument are the same thing.
My premise is that Supergirl's random mooks will make Thor's anus prolapse. My argument is that Supergirl's feats are far superior to anything Thor has shown, meaning that she would casually manhandle Thor. Her foes are able to challenge Supergirl, therefore they could best him handily as well.
So we ignore all the speed feats Supergirl has because Thor "looks" faster?
Also, in what fight scene by the way? Because all of Thor's fight scenes portray him as a brawler who doesn't visually use much in the way of super speed in fights. When he fights Loki he isn't moving so fast he can't be seen. Likely because a fight we can't see is boring.
This is a buzzword only a phaggot would use my son.
Skill only matters if the opponents are roughly physical peers. Supergirl is many times Thor's physical superior. His skill means nothing here.
What does this even mean my son?
Let me tell you what you are doing. You are essentially saying that Thor wins because he benefits from a much better budget.
By your logic, Thor should beat Reeves Superman in a fight despite Superman's feats being many orders of magnitude better, simply due to how dated the special effects are.
Tell me if you believe Thor would beat Reeves Superman, so I can dismiss your opinions are being excremental gayness.
Because they have been portrayed in the same films as completely different. We know Thor has taken on the Hulk who casually stopped a leviathan. It's a feat we don't over exaggerate and forget how these guys stack up against guys without these feats and pretend there's a vast difference rbetween the two. Fights and portrayals matter more than feats.
KMC Community Forums
Mar 27th, 2017 08:44 PM
