Fact remains that she had no problem pointing out AOC's "12 years" claim, she did this twice in less than 2 mins to prove her point. She could have easily spent and extra 20 seconds to give even a single valid name and example; it's telling that she didn't.
You only asked me to watch her 1st point and give my POV of the situation; that's what I did. She was shifty, dishonest and outright lied in her 1st point.
I disagree and I noted why previously. Jaden's position on her #1 point has not shifted.
If you want to brush this off as "trolling", go ahead; that's on you. But it's clear I watched that part of the vid as you requested and I gave reasons to my stances.
Also I'm gonna ask: I know he has a degree in mechanical engineering, but what scientific research has Nye conducted in regards to climate science?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
How dare you contradict the narrative. How dare you.
Do you not care about how many dreams and childhoods you kill?
Won't somebody worry about the dreams?!
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
She did exactly as I claimed and I pointed out why her claims are wrong. I debunked her video.
No one has done the courtesy of even attempting to do the same with the videos I posted. I would be willing to bet no one even watched them. I wonder why.
__________________ Sweating on the streets of Woking
U gonna pretend like u watched the original video in this thread? Please don't.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
And this is one of the funnier exchanges I've had on KMC (I rank it the #2 of all conversations where I thoroughly and completely handed someone's ass to them):
Obviously you can't read because I didn't address 1. I addressed several. All of which proved my point. They were all news articles, not scientific papers. 1 was a quote from Al Gore (not a climate scientist). 1 was a quote from Prince Charles (not a climate scientist) and 2 were from Paul Elhrich (a scientist but not a climate scientist and from his book, not a scientific study or paper)
You. Literally. Proved. My. Point.
__________________ Sweating on the streets of Woking
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I don't think so and I feel like he is gas lighting you. For example, when you note that a scientific paper was indeed published he responds that no a scientific paper wasn't published it was just a "news article". As if it was some op-ed from the Washington Post or something.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Last edited by Surtur on Oct 18th, 2019 at 06:23 PM
Indeed... just admit you're wrong and it'll be the end of it.
__________________ Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth bound feathered dinosaur. But it is not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that.-- Alan Feduccia-a world authority on birds, quoted in "Archaeopteryx:Early Bird Catches a Can of Worms," Science 1994, p.764-765
__________________ Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth bound feathered dinosaur. But it is not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that.-- Alan Feduccia-a world authority on birds, quoted in "Archaeopteryx:Early Bird Catches a Can of Worms," Science 1994, p.764-765
I know I did nothing wrong and Jaden and I agree on most of his points anyway. It is not controversial, even in the climate change community, to admit the predictions by the climatologists themselves, are often wrong. It's extremely difficult to make accurate predictions and those that get it right sometimes are right for the wrong reasons (wrong model that just so happened to get it right).