Wolverine vs. Spider-Man

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Which fight are you talking about.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Thinking objectivley, do you ever. All you do is cry"it happened here"

Which is more objective? To accept what happened, or to deny dsomething because you don't like it?

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
so again I ask you, hwo can he break the webbing, without sufficient strength to do so, without using claws, your reasoning needs an update.

Depowering character for your own purposes?

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Wolveirne supporters all do this.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
He was hit by hulk, he beat 100 ninjas, he survived a nuke, too bad you can't explain it.

The nuke thing was riddiculous though. . .

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
But daredevils did, and Namor's didn't?

Namor is to wolverine, as Firelord is to Spiderman. . .

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Nothing, I think not, those hits do plenty of damage, add in velocity, = brain bruise.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
No he still can't, more and more webbing, either way its still a defeat.

See? You simply don't like the explination.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Nope, I didn't where did wolverine get listed off to do the things he does, but its nowhere to be found in his abilities. its a cash gimmick. 😉

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Age, experience, he gets stronger, like colossus and others

Originally posted by Creshosk
Cemetary one where he was trying to keep wolverine away form the girl.

As opposed to "My taste in the matter dictates if it happened or not."

Which is more objective? To accept what happened, or to deny dsomething because you don't like it?

You're taking his claws from him?

Depowering character for your own purposes?

Spidey supportes always seem to depower his opponents. . .

No, you just don't like the explinations.

The nuke thing was riddiculous though. . .

No, its because there was none, its just posted up as "he did it", you don't get around to explaining the chances of him to do so.

which is more objective, to use what makes sense, or get what is used to best suit you, despite it not being logical, at all.

Our side has given, facts, calculations and everything. Your side just says it happens, and answers questions with questions. Its the same thign, you aren't willing to see that this is a hypothetical fight, and want it played out all the same. tsk tsk.

Seeing as you can't explain those feats, then why should I accept it? You want me to argue for you now?

Originally posted by Creshosk

Is he listed to lift 2000, didn't think so.

Parker was a teen to an adult, he also got the powers from the woman, they're permenant.

Wolveirne's wavers, he hurts thanos, but can't break handcuffs, sorry its just not concrete.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Namor is to wolverine, as Firelord is to Spiderman. . .

Which he heals. . . Within the thirty seconds it'd take to have brain death.

Unless he keeps clawing his way out. . .

See? You simply don't like the explination.

How will he claw the way out if the claws are usless.

I don't like the explanation because it isnt' good or logical.

What you are implying is that wolverine heals before the damage is done, nope.

Saying his hits have no effect is a strawman and fanboy argument.

Didn't daredevils? Using examples which suit you, from poor references at that, which leave a questionmark. Too bad hulk hasn't killed cap wolverine or spiderman yet.

If you are gonna compare wolverines feats eg. he beat Namor. Her is some of spidey's
He beat Digger (zombie hulk thing) then admitted to MJ that he has found a way to beat the Hulk but it would kill Hulk.
When he first started he gave the FF a run for their money. (Wolverine needed help with the invisible woman in enemy of the state.)
He fought and beat Molurn with very very little prep. (Molurn was as strong as Thor or the Hulk)
He once lifted a train carriage when he got angry.
he beat a herald of Galactus.
He went all the way across New York city in less than 11 minutes by web swinging.

these are but a few. Im sure wolverine also has many feats im just trying to put feats of ability into perspective.

Cresh is in denial, your logic is in need of a tuneup.

You'll see clearly one day.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
No, its because there was none, its just posted up as "he did it", you don't get around to explaining the chances of him to do so.

No, obviously not. So you're going to keep using your piss poor logic to try and discredit what Marvel did with it's own characters.

Why did Peter take the Jobs at trhe bugle?

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
which is more objective, to use what makes sense, or get what is used to best suit you, despite it not being logical, at all.

It makes as much sense as comics do. Wolverine's healing can take the damage spiderman dishes out.

You don't like that explination, but it makes sense.

"Oh well it's inconsistant becvause iot doesn't suit my needs, so it's discarded."

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Our side has given, facts,

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
calculations

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
and everything.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Your side just says it happens, and answers questions with questions.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Its the same thign, you aren't willing to see that this is a hypothetical fight, and want it played out all the same. tsk tsk.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Seeing as you can't explain those feats, then why should I accept it? You want me to argue for you now?

"No explination? Didn't happen!"

What the hell do you think Science IS?

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Creshosk
I'll take that as a no.

"That means you're even worse than CorderaMitchell, At least he knows what PIS and CIS means. "

This guy says it all.

Where I've used science, don't tell me you think thats valid now.

You just want me to like it, without explaining it, because you can't.

Its a lame attempt to escape an utter defeat, denail is the only reason you're here.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
How will he claw the way out if the claws are usless.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
I don't like the explanation because it isnt' good or logical.

What's illogical about it?

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
What you are implying is that wolverine heals before the damage is done, nope.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Saying his hits have no effect is a strawman and fanboy argument.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Didn't daredevils? Using examples which suit you, from poor references at that, which leave a questionmark. Too bad hulk hasn't killed cap wolverine or spiderman yet.

I'm bringing up Spiderman vs. Wolverine examples.

You're bringing up everything BUT WvsS.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
quote: (post)
Originally posted by Creshosk
I'll take that as a no.

"That means you're even worse than CorderaMitchell, At least he knows what PIS and CIS means. "

This guy says it all.

Where I've used science, don't tell me you think thats valid now.

You just want me to like it, without explaining it, because you can't.

Its a lame attempt to escape an utter defeat, denail is the only reason you're here.

You damaged your own argument by appealing to "the populace" here . . .

Originally posted by Creshosk
Why?

You don't like it because it doesn't suit you.

What's illogical about it?

No, I'm saying that he heals after the damage has been done but before it takes effect.

No, it's going off of what already happened.

You're being a hypodrite you realize?

I'm bringing up Spiderman vs. Wolverine examples.

You're bringing up everything BUT WvsS.

You just quoted someone who doesn't know anything about the characters and frustrates you because of it?

You damaged your own argument by appealing to "the populace" here . . .

Lol, he's right nonetheless.

You're argument is illogical, because wolveirne doesn't have the sufficient strength to break that webbing, and you know it. So instead of accepting it, you pull the same ***** tactics which don't really bother me anymore, just shows your denial.

You not yet answered a question, you are questioning one, therefore it looks like YOU can't answer the question. Noone watching thinks that you are making a point. Until you learn to do so, I will then be impressed, goodday.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Lol, he's right nonetheless.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
You're argument is illogical, because wolveirne doesn't have the sufficient strength to break that webbing, and you know it.

Why do you keep taking his claws?

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
So instead of accepting it, you pull the same ***** tactics which don't really bother me anymore, just shows your denial.

"He inconsistant! There's no explination!"

You're a hypocrite.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
You not yet answered a question, you are questioning one, therefore it looks like YOU can't answer the question. Noone watching thinks that you are making a point. Until you learn to do so, I will then be impressed, goodday.

I've already said that people's opinions DON'T Matter to me one way or the other.

You just don't like the answers.

"Ignorance is not haveing knowlegde, because you haven't had the chance. Stupidity is not haveing knowledge, becuacuse it is refused."

Originally posted by willRules
If you are gonna compare wolverines feats eg. he beat Namor. Her is some of spidey's
He beat Digger (zombie hulk thing) then admitted to MJ that he has found a way to beat the Hulk but it would kill Hulk.
When he first started he gave the FF a run for their money. (Wolverine needed help with the invisible woman in enemy of the state.)
He fought and beat Molurn with very very little prep. (Molurn was as strong as Thor or the Hulk)
He once lifted a train carriage when he got angry.
he beat a herald of Galactus.
He went all the way across New York city in less than 11 minutes by web swinging.

these are but a few. Im sure wolverine also has many feats im just trying to put feats of ability into perspective.

I agree

Disagreeing is I disagree, are you god.

I didnt take away claws, you are ignoring that spiderman can web him to make his claws unusable, he has a hard time with handcuffs. he could do that.

You are trying to skip around my points,to make it sound like you are making one, a ***** tactic.

Originally posted by willRules
I agree

Or are you just trying to make your post more noticed?

Originally posted by Creshosk
With yourself?

Or are you just trying to make your post more noticed?

Both

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
I didnt take away claws, you are ignoring that spiderman can web him to make his claws unusable, he has a hard time with handcuffs. he could do that.

And you say you recognize PIS/CIS writing. .

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
You are trying to skip around my points,to make it sound like you are making one, a ***** tactic.

Originally posted by willRules
Both

Wolverine versus X or Spiderman versus Y

where X is not Spiderman, and Y is not Wolverine, in this thread?

Originally posted by Creshosk
800 pounds of strength is sufficient to accomplish something that only takes 500 pounds?

And you say you recognize PIS/CIS writing. .

Hypocrite.

Silly boy, how would he generate the leverage if his arms are binded with his wrists UP?

Don't be so hard on yourself. 🙂 *pats head*