Wolverine vs. Spider-Man

Originally posted by Melnorme
Twenty. Five. Tonner.

Hulk's lifted mountains. Different categories.

Originally posted by Melnorme
Yes. Spidey was going easy on him. He was trying to get Spidey to hand over a kid. Didn't happen.

No. Just less resilliant in general. Thus, he escaped by leveraging against the webs to begin with.

webbs that give leverage when shot.. hence webslinging... tada! 😱

Originally posted by jinzin
who said I'm comparing him to hulk? 😕..

You did.

Originally posted by jinzin
class 70 or 80 close enough...

Originally posted by jinzin
webbs that give leverage when shot.. hence webslinging... tada! 😱

Tada. 😛

Originally posted by Melnorme
You did.

no I campared him to a class 100 lifter..

I didn't know being a class 100 lifter automatically made one the hulk.... wow...

🤨

Originally posted by wolverine8888
go read that official marvel wolverine hand book of 2004. states rough-house at 75 to 100 tons. also wolverine said befor that rough house aint quite hulks level of strength but dam close.
also hulk has hit wolverine heads on plenty of times which jinzin proboly has mroe pics then me of seeing how i dont got a scanner

Was that scan from 2004?

Originally posted by jinzin
no I campared him to a class 100 lifter..

I didn't know being a class 100 lifter automatically made one the hulk.... wow...🤨

It doesn't. But still, those are your words. Sorry.

Originally posted by Melnorme
Not when dried. Until they dissolve, like they were.

Tada. 😛

actually they do.. which is why the webbing has elasticity...

🙄

you ARE at least aware spiderman can change it's consistency are you not?

Originally posted by Melnorme
It doesn't. But still, those are your words. Sorry.

k quote me...

Originally posted by Melnorme
Was that scan from 2004?

no but why does that matter? in that comic, wolverien states rough-house strength to be only a little bit under hulk.

Originally posted by wolverine8888
no but why does that matter? in that comic, wolverien states rough-house strength to be only a little bit under hulk.

No he doesn't.

And it matters because that scan is from a different era than the stats you're quoting.

Originally posted by jinzin
actually they do.. which is why the webbing has elasticity...

🙄

you ARE at least aware spiderman can change it's consistency are you not?

Are you suggesting that he'd ensnare someone using elastic webbing, instead of a firmer holding webbing?

Originally posted by wolverine8888
no but why does that matter? in that comic, wolverien states rough-house strength to be only a little bit under hulk.

wolverine's a no good dirty liar! 😏

how would he know? hulk's only ever hit him with glancing blows...

😕

actauly he does in that comic befor there fight he states it. wolverine also states it during another fight with rough-house when he only ahs bone claws.

Originally posted by jinzin
k quote me...

Originally posted by Melnorme

Originally posted by Melnorme
Are you suggesting that he'd ensnare someone using elastic webbing, instead of a firmer holding webbing?

in a word... yes..

cause you know.. that's what he did...

Originally posted by Melnorme
Already did.

well you've certainly proven that I said roughouse is close enough to a class 100 character.... that's to be sure.. (which was a smart ass remark, but I guess you didn't get THAT either) yet I fail to see where I've claimed he's comparible to hulk...

Originally posted by jinzin
wolverine's a no good dirty liar! 😏

how would he know? hulk's only ever hit him with glancing blows...

😕

We don't see the blow connect, and given the status of Wolverine's face and body in the following panel, we can only conclude that Wolverine avoided that blow.

Originally posted by jinzin
well you've certainly proven that I said roughouse is close enough to a class 100 character.... that's to be sure.. (which was a smart ass remark, but I guess you didn't get THAT either) yet I fail to see where I've claimed he's comparible to hulk...

Backpedal much?

are u ****ing seorus so wolverine went under ground of his own willing ness?