Metalmanx
Illuminati Founder
Originally posted by capt it up
what was wrong with Logan killing spiderman in the what if the x-men lost the enferno. what if are what if becuase the pure fact they never happen and are unusable as evidenceYou can not simply use a part of it becuase you liked that part it sad and pethetic of you. Do you see us using what if as evidence? honestly the whole thing does not matter becuase it a what if. if it had shown logqan stabbing spiderman you be scream and yelling saying it unusable and such yet becuase spiderman does good you find it useable. That retarded and show how bad you can get some times with the whole spiderman thing. You are a spiderman fanboy and you need to learn this.
Alright. Lemme try a different approach here.
That scene that I showed you, this one right here:
http://img372.imageshack.us/img372/5122/whatifwolverineenemyoftjf0.jpg
...This could happen exactly the same way (sans teleportation) in a 616 comic. That was my entire point. Magneto, Invisible Woman, or Classic Juggernaut losing to Wolverine would not happen ever in 616. Yet, this scene with Spider-Man and Wolverine could happen just like this in 616 continuity. There's no stretching of the "truth" here. Just simple fact applied to a different realm.
I mean, if I argued that people in What Ifs breathed oxygen then they must breathe oxygen in 616, would you deny it because it happens first in What If? If I said "In What Ifs, when normal people get cut they start to bleed, so that must be true in the 616 universe as well", would you again deny this and say it can't be used as evidence because it's a What If? Using your logic, apparently you would.
In case you didn't understand most of this, I'm not technically using the What If scene as evidence. I'm pointing out the fact that the very same thing can happen frame-for-frame (sans teleportation) in 616 and it would be just fine character-wise.
If you still deny this, then simple logic is clearly lost on you.