Ok this feat war is getting really stupid now, people are accusing others of thing's when 1 they may not be doing it and 2 the other person could be accused of the same thing.
In the end when characters are in the same range of speed you can't really pick out a speed feat without another one being comparable.
I mean think about it (these aren't feats these are just random things out of my head) 3 guys shoot at Spider-man and Spider-man reacts so fast he seems like a burr to these guys and get webbed up. 3 guys get into a fist fight with Logan Logan moves so fast the others can't register him and he kills them quickly.
Now are these 2 scenarios comparable, yes yes they are now which one is superior?? that's your opinion when these things are so close together does this mean the feats are equal maybe, maybe not. Did these characters do this at the same speed again maybe maybe not. All these speed feats are about speculation and opinion on whether the feat is on par with the other or not. Is it bias if you choose when over another maybe it is but if thats the case then both debaters are being biased.
In other words leave Metalmanx alone he has an opinion maybe it is biased but the rest could be said for the rest of the people in this debate, yes that's right even me.
Originally posted by Sparkz
Ok this feat war is getting really stupid now, people are accusing others of thing's when 1 they may not be doing it and 2 the other person could be accused of the same thing.In the end when characters are in the same range of speed you can't really pick out a speed feat without another one being comparable.
I mean think about it (these aren't feats these are just random things out of my head) 3 guys shoot at Spider-man and Spider-man reacts so fast he seems like a burr to these guys and get webbed up. 3 guys get into a fist fight with Logan Logan moves so fast the others can't register him and he kills them quickly.
Now are these 2 scenarios comparable, yes yes they are now which one is superior?? that's your opinion when these things are so close together does this mean the feats are equal maybe, maybe not. Did these characters do this at the same speed again maybe maybe not. All these speed feats are about speculation and opinion on whether the feat is on par with the other or not. Is it bias if you choose when over another maybe it is but if thats the case then both debaters are being biased.
In other words leave Metalmanx alone he has an opinion maybe it is biased but the rest could be said for the rest of the people in this debate, yes that's right even me.
But if that's the case, then doesn't that prove Capt, Jinzin, and S-Rank right? After all, haven't they been saying this entire time that Wolverine and Spiderman are in the same "range of speed?" And if that's all their trying to prove, what's wrong with them putting up those feats to show that their speeds are, indeed comparable?
Originally posted by Ize19
But if that's the case, then doesn't that prove Capt, Jinzin, and S-Rank right? After all, haven't they been saying this entire time that Wolverine and Spiderman are in the same "range of speed?" And if that's all their trying to prove, what's wrong with them putting up those feats to show that their speeds are, indeed comparable?
the fact that its constantly being siad that their scans are superior or equal.
Yes their scans proved Wolverine is in the speed range, but neither side has actualy proven who is faster.( even if we know it is Spider-man but only by a small degree)
Ok this didn't come out right, what I'm trying to say is that while both party's are using scans to prove a point it is essentialy a matter of opinion on whether the counter scan is on par or superior.
Oh yeah and this whole thing Wolverine wasn't a 100 percent is a bit far fetched, this kid hadn't practiced his powers yet (or much) he was only really getting the hang of it when he fought Spidey and Logan together, but wasn't Spider-man also shot by the same blast that Wolverine was? Or at least to the same degree of power, and Spidey seemed pretty unaffected except for being shot outside, now for a guy without a healing factor that just shows that the blast weren't as great as everyone was saying untill the kid really satrted going for it.
Unless the kid really cut loose against Logan but again when he did that around the end of the fight itself Logan was momentarily stunned. Again this is speculation i just find it strange that Wolverine would have been effected by these shots but not Spider-man
Originally posted by DigiMark007I hate to be the one to end the dream but I hope everyone realizes that the thread is broken and or flawed because I have just viewed the thread many times without posting 😛
Bizarre!This thread, at the moment I entered it, had EXACTLY the same number of posts and views. 16,888 for each. The odds of that happening to a thread this long-running are staggeringly low.
Jesus...I may need to play the lottery or something.
Originally posted by DigiMark007Thats why I had to stop you I didn't want you to loose your money 😛
Blah.Well, at least I saved on the lotto ticket.
😮
Originally posted by SoleranDestroying dreams is what I do 😈
Now I have to go cry myself to sleep in a dark closet somewhere, thanks for taking away my dream 😱 😆