Wolverine: how would you like some adamantiu---uhh uhhhhh uhhhhheewww........
BATMAN: That's just the knock out gas that I hit you with........you should be out cold.
Wolverine: uuuuhhhhhh uhhh Say's you bub, I got's this healing factor hey, and it helps makes me the best at what I do dontcha know.
BATMAN: hmmmm...Well if you're the best at taking bat-grenades to the face.....NO ARGUMENTS HERE! (lobs grenades from belt)
(KAAABOOOOM) x 5 or 7
WOLVERINE: (very shaken...and blown up) y-y-you think that a little explosion or two is gonna put me down for the count hey? My fanboy following allows me to survive nukes full yeil--
BATMAN: (nailed wolverine in the adams apple with a baterang) I threw 5 grenades at you, you idiot, you're not worth my time, I'm gonna go be a rich playboy now and get some mad booty,,,,,later.
WOLVIE: (Writhing in pain looks on as BAts drives off in his sweet batmobile, Wolvie finally doubles over and begins to cry)
anyways.....despite my total mutiny to my favorite hero, I think that wolverine would win in a battle via no prep time, but as i've sad before,,,,,,give batman 10 minutes to get ready,,,,,even 5 and we're talking about a whole nother fight.
that's actually a pretty good scenario......
hard to believe i'm actually agreeing with you again, jinzin.
i promise i won't let it happen again. 😖hifty:
...and for the record...
i DO NOT believe Logan is better than Bruce in hand-to-hand.
if anyone disagrees with that, than please, show me ANY pics
of Logan doing complex maneuvers like Batman does.
we've all read Batman comics. we've seen what the man does.
show me ONE example of Logan doing that kinda stuff.
I say It could go either way, but Wolverine has that healing factor upgrade that allows him to now heal from being an eyeball.
Therefore, Batman would put up a good fight, but Wolverine would match him in fighting ability, strategic fighting,strength,speed, and agility. Wolverine would also, decimate him do to the fact that he can last longer in stamina and he has an adamantium skeleton and claws that cut through any project batman throws. He can dodge them too.
Plus, Batman's hands would probably begin to start really hurting after pounding on that super dense skeleton after awile and if he makes the slightest mistake, which fighting Logan will force him to do, he dies.
Also, Wolverine could just get in close and go berserker.
"Rargh-arghhhh!" "Snikt"
"I guess you ain't so tough after all, Bub"
Zahit,
cause you can flip around and twirl around in the air and do stuff like that doesn't mean you're the best.
Wolverine has flipped around and used that level of agility and acrobatics ,but he would rather stay on the ground and fight, most of the time.
What you're saying is like if Jackie chan fights Bruce Lee hes the greatest cause he flipps around and does acrobatics while Bruce doesn't.
Tell me this, what happens when Jackie does a complecated flip attack move and Bruce just knocks the F#@k out of him, is he still the best then.
Dude, you argue with no logic.
Give it a rest, man.
Next.
He argues with no logic dude it is already a known fact that Bruce Lee is the Greatest among people like Jet Li and Jackie Chan. We are in the process of deciding who is the best between Wolverine and Batman and frankly your logic is very flawed.
If your logic is that people who do a lot aerobatic stuff are not as tough as people who do not then friend you need to see the Newest batgirl fight. She is all over the place. And besides using aerobatics during a fight gives you an advantage over your opponent.
Once you've been around for more then a hundred years, most of which were in combat I think it safe to say that you would have perfected your own combat style. Wolverine knows his limitations and he knows what works, just because he doesn't stand in fancy stances doesn't mean he isn't skilled. But even so their are many examples of Wolverine using actually martial art styles and even more acrobatics (a post some scans of the former in a Wolverine thread on here somewhere)
And acrobatics are nothing but impractical in a real fight.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
And acrobatics are nothing but impractical in a real fight.
Originally posted by Zahit
put it this way, would you rather fight:1. a guy with a black belt in karate.
or
2. a guy with a black belt in karate and olympic-level gymnast/acrobat.
I would rather fight the guy without organ slicing and bone piercing claws. Wolverine would draw batmans fighting abilities close quartered. Batman dies hard and fast.
wolverine wins regardless, i don't care who has a better fighting style but i would not want to mess with some mofo with 6 razorsharp claws made of the hardest metal, on matter how great you are, it only takes once, this fight will always end in the same way, wolverine sabbing his claws in batmans chest, just like how he did to his master, ogun, and the great master swordsman, shighen.
Originally posted bysrankmissingnin
It was in responce to the Jackie Chan/ Bruce Lee points. If it isn't asking to much, try to keep up.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I only brought it up because lifeisaglich is under the flase impression acrobatics make you a better fighter.
This where you probably got that vague idea, Dude read this again and tell me where I said acrobatics makes someone a better fighter, and while you are thinking remember the person I used as an example. (The Newest Batgirl)
Posted by me in response to jplatinum
If your logic is that people who do a lot aerobatic stuff are not as tough as people who do not then friend you need to see the Newest batgirl fight. She is all over the place. And besides using aerobatics during a fight gives you an advantage over your opponent.
In real life
This is just logic here if you know aerobatics and you are a good fighter bub you will be the best the world of humans has to offer. Effectively combining the two will make you the best of the best. And going into the UFC who ever that person is going to dominate this is why said person is going to be very unpredictable, (Ask Jack Chan, Jet Li) and your attacks will be multiplied if you effectively combine the two.
Of course this is my opinion, since as there is no one capable of doing such a feat IN REAL LIFE. But I know I am correct. USING LOGIC.
Batman is the better martial artist, and is also the one who goes up against insurmountable odds and he is the one still standing at the end. And he does not have any healing factor, indestructible claws, and all what not. As a matter of fact eats people who have healing factors, indestructibility of some kind for launch.
And before you start remember that I am only stating facts.
Originally posted by lifeisaglich
I did not use Jackie Chan/Bruce Lee to make any points, if I did show me. Before this particular post, Show me all the Jackie Chan/Bruce Lee points I made.
I think you are a little paranoid dude, I didn't even mention your name yet but yes you did bring up Bruce Lee and Jackie Chan in res ponce to jplatinum's post... just scroll up a few posts and you'll see it.
Well it is true you didn't come right out and say acrobatics makes you a better fighter you did say it gives you an advantage over your opponent; I interpreted this as you saying it made someone a better fighter.
The only advantage to acrobatics in a real fight would be that perhaps your body his more flexible (not really a factor if the other opponent is an accomplished martial artist) and you will be able to roll with the punches a bit better but if someone started to do back flips and summer salts in a fight they'd get laid out.
Just a side not Batgirl is effective because she can read movements and because she is a ringer NOT because she is incredible acrobatic (although she is incredible acrobatic).
Zahit said in response to srankmissingnin who wrote
And acrobatics are nothing but impractical in a real fight.
Originally posted Zahit
by I wonder how Batman, Daredevil, Black Panther, Captain America,
Nightcrawler, Elektra, Spiderman, Beast, Black Cat, Nightwing,
The Creeper, Blue Beetle, Taskmaster, Deadpool, Robin, Catwoman,
Batgirl, Longshot, Shang Chi, and Iron Fist would feel about that...
srankmissingnin responded to zahit saying
I would imagine, not being real and all, that they wouldn't have much to say about it one way or another as I was talking about the real world... with real fights. If you started doing back flips and acrobatics in a real fight I can't see the out come being in your favour.
Zahit replied to srankmissingnin
Home » Comic Book Forums » Comic Book 'Versus' Forum » Batman vs Wolverine
srankmissingnin countered
It was in responce to the Jackie Chan/ Bruce Lee points. If it isn't asking to much, try to keep up.
Zahit came back with
Who cares about Jackie Chan/Bruce Lee here.
We're talking about Wolverine versus Batman.
Focus Daniel-san.......or you'll receive crane-position....
srankmissingnin implied that
I only brought it up because lifeisaglich is under the flase impression acrobatics make you a better fighter.
And this was when I new you where talking about my post. Thus I had to reply. You or anybody else would have done the same if the shoes was on the other foot.
And you said I am a little paranoid.... Dude... I wouldn't know paranoid even if it beat me in the ass🙂
Just a side not Batgirl is effective because she can read movements and because she is a ringer NOT because she is incredible acrobatic (although she is incredible acrobatic).
In real life
A person with great skill in arcrobatics and in martial arts. And who knows when and how to apply the arcrobatic move when he or she fights. This is never going to happen and this is what I have been saying.