Originally posted by OneDumbG0You know what bro? Lets go back to a couple of those Spectre threads because I'm going to use "Geoff Johns hates the character and that makes his interpretations of the character unusable" as a valid excuse. Then I'm going to say anything else you pull is PIS against a character that can shake the multiverse when he fights.
^ 👆 It is extremely far off.
And if that doesn't work or you try to point out the flaw in it, I'll call you a troll. AND a liar.
I'm trying his approach. Seem accurate?
Originally posted by Juntai
Context like "the writer of these entire runs sucks"? lol.
Being a terrible writers is irrelevant, writing a consistent portrayal of a character that conforms with the majority representation of the character is what matters. If an issue is noticeably inconsistent with the typical representation of a character's personality and power set, then it is PIS and irrelevant. If you don't feel comfortable ignoring an entire run whole sale, you can go by an issue by issue bases... but with the writer in question the end result is exactly the same.
Some forums have rules that ignore Larry Hama's entire run of Batman... and that is a golden master piece of literature compared to Way's work.
Originally posted by Juntaihave you read any of Garth Ennis books or interviews?
You know what bro? Lets go back to a couple of those Spectre threads because I'm going to use "Geoff Johns hates the character and that makes his interpretations of the character unusable" as a valid excuse. Then I'm going to say anything else you pull is PIS against a character that can shake the multiverse when he fights.And if that doesn't work or you try to point out the flaw in it, I'll call you a troll. AND a liar.
I'm trying his approach. Seem accurate?
the dude tends to make satirical stories on superheroes he even admits to it in one of his interviews if u look him up on youtube. he is actually proud of this and being allowed to get away with in comics.
its video interview and their dozens pick one.
I think his books should be taken with a grain of salt the dude doesnt take particular stories very seriously
Originally posted by Juntai
Context like "the writer of these entire runs sucks"? lol.
Problem is, srank's argument is that Wolverine's organs get liquefied every time he's hit by a cl 20 or above, he just heals near instantly.
If his healing was really that fast, we’d never see him injured by below cl 20 attacks, as the wounds would heal to fast for Wolverine to bleed more than a drop….IOW srank is saying that the several hundred times we’ve seen Logan injured are PIS.
Originally posted by srankmissingninthumbs up on the Boys reference a perfect example of how Garth Ennis views superheroes..
lmao @ at trying to equate to Loeb to Garth Ennis.
I also agree on the trolling observation.
"I dont hate Superheroes but I find them silly............"
LmaOhsQF8OI&feature=related
Originally posted by SamZEDi think a lot of DC ppl wouldnt consider his books canon either.
Dont even concider his books canon...
especially after what he did to Lobo. 😆
aside from that I dont think his Hitman superheroes exist outside his own stories.
u cant take a guy who creates mock versions of superheroes in DC too seriously especially when one is called Dog welder and another six pack. 😂
here he calls superheroes ridicules...
bRi7tj5hyss&feature=related
Originally posted by srankmissingninthat is odd b/c Garth Ennis admits to having his cynical and silly views on heroes influencing him on how he portrays them in his writing.
Haven't you heard? Ennis writing is actually very genuine and respectful, consisting of accurate and introspective portrayals of superhero characters. I'm simply crazy and reading into context that isn't there.
😕
Originally posted by Nietzschean
that is oddb/c Garth Ennis admits to having his cynical and silly views on heroes influencing him on how he portrays them in his writing.😕
Your mistaken. Ennis portrayal of Wolverine is the only thing that counts.... but not the one where he tanked a punch from the Hulk that knocked him across the country (that was bs too), only the part where Daredevil dropped him. All other Wolverine appearance are invalid because Batman can't beat him. I think that seems reasonable.
Originally posted by NietzscheanTell me.. was it worth it? Was this post worth making two various responces to the same quote? 😒 😛
u just cant stomach that Wolverine took down Spiderman and spidey lite/DD at the same time. 😛
It was a cheap shot. Not to mention it occured right after Wolverine screamed like a girl... because he was affraid to fall from a building... 😕 Think I can manage to not take all of that seriously.
http://pensivemischief.blogspot.com/2009/06/my-wolverine-garth-enniss-sam-kieths.html
http://www.popmatters.com/pm/feature/128649-confederacy-of-bad-asses-2-the-life-of-reilly
by the way the Punisher series at the time was not part of marvel continuity which allowed them to get away with all the Garth Ennis stuff
http://ifanboy.com/articles/marvel-cancels-punisher-max-with-issue-22/
so why do ppl keep using those stories for a DD/punisher feat? 😕
Originally posted by JuntaiAs long as you understand that you'll get mixed results with the approach. 👆
You know what bro? Lets go back to a couple of those Spectre threads because I'm going to use "Geoff Johns hates the character and that makes his interpretations of the character unusable" as a valid excuse. Then I'm going to say anything else you pull is PIS against a character that can shake the multiverse when he fights.And if that doesn't work or you try to point out the flaw in it, I'll call you a troll. AND a liar.
I'm trying his approach. Seem accurate?
Also make sure you pick more than one writer's storylines to arbitrarily banish. And especially make sure that one of those writers is responsible for the main storylines of the character for, like, 4 years or more. 😂
Originally posted by NietzscheanEnnis' run on Punisher is in continuinity. One of thse articles even reinforces that. It's Punisher MAX that's not in continuity, a completely separate line of comics.
http://pensivemischief.blogspot.com/2009/06/my-wolverine-garth-enniss-sam-kieths.htmlhttp://www.popmatters.com/pm/feature/128649-confederacy-of-bad-asses-2-the-life-of-reilly
by the way the Punisher series at the time was not part of marvel continuity which allowed them to get away with all the Garth Ennis stuff
http://ifanboy.com/articles/marvel-cancels-punisher-max-with-issue-22/
so why do ppl keep using those stories for a DD/punisher feat? 😕