Saddam has been captured!

Started by Ushgarak12 pages

Did anyone listen to what Raz just said? Keep the bitterness out of here.

Gp said:

"Not that irrelevant : as a matter of fact, he would have done the same thing as Milosevic : use the court as a means to attack those who had intervened in his country's affairs. (even though the intervention was backed by the UN )"

That makes no sense. He can make a verbal assault on the legitimacy of the occupation of Iraq no matter where he is tried- the UN, Iraq, the States, Zambia... no difference at all.

Your suggestion was that he could make a legal assault on the pccupation in the International Court. He could not.

I wasnt being bitter, just a little sarcastic...

This war was about how dangerous and how powerful Saddam was. The way saddam was captured just tells you how well equipped he was. He hid in a hole digged underground in the front yard of a farmhouse in the Iraqi country on his own.

Also let me point out that his capture works out nicely for Bushy's next election doesent it. You'd think that the us government always knew where he was and waited for the right moment to boost up the election by breaking the attacks that the other parties have targetted at the bush government.

Dont you americans forget that he is a president just like Bush. Imagine if the Iraqis showed Bush on International TV with a long beard and long hair attending a medical check. He would be in the exact same position as Saddam. So he and the members of his government (Bremer) shouldnt call him a tyrant and a use phrases like "The dictator is brought down" or crap like that. You complained about your military soldiers being shown on TV was a breach of the Geneva Convention.
Humiliating and showing a messed up political leader isnt?

Either way, Saddam who looked like Father Christmas managed to give Bush his best christmas present: his own capture.

Please... this is still looking very political; don't be.

How come we can't talk politics?

well now

seems like even if they want, they can't sentence Saddam to death just yet, if they want to convict him in Iraq, think it would be stupid to that anywhere else. But if they want to convict him in Iraq, by Iraqi laws, they NEED iraqi laws which they don't have ATM LOL

the reason they can't sentence him to death is because the american

Spoiler:
OCCUPATION
"Liberation" Force has forbidden it.

Because discussing politics usualy leads to fights

Shame if they had a little 'accident'

They won't have a lil accident, they can't afford to just kill him without a trial

Discussing politics does create fights, but it can also shut up people who are happy that Saddam has been captured without knowing why from talking bull***t.

true, but the rules say you can DV so that's it

Originally posted by Dirty Vader
Discussing politics does create fights, but it can also shut up people who are happy that Saddam has been captured without knowing why from talking bull***t.

No. Absolutely not. It will not shut up anyone, it will only cause a massive fight, and we will not allow it. Don't do it.

Politics leading to fights is why I haven't posted in here yet; I have strong political views, but I don't want to piss off people and start a fight. However, I am glad that they finally did catch Saddam. But I'm not saying anything more on the topic.

Did I miss something? 😕

We're trying to stop any potential fights that could come from discussing politics ._.

Did anybody see the David Lettermen Episode with the Top 10 things left on the White House answering machine? One of them was "YPu caught Saddam yet" Well, we got him!!! Abother one was about Osama. We still don't have him, but sonner or later, we'll get him too.

What is there to discuss? Saddam was captured, isn't that a good thing? It's not like they are going to execute him, they're just going to keep him locked away.

--->

they should give him like life in a prison cell with 8 dudes....that outta be interesting.. 😂

depends on how you look at it, rex
for you perhaps, for others not