Originally posted by Mr Parker
Where is the yellow background in the emblem? 😠
In my opinion, I think the emblem looks better without the yellow background. Kind of made it look ugly and a sign of earlier Batman art. I think the new one is a new change, twist to the original. Isn't change or even a little bit of it, good? Can't do any harm to the reawakening of the Batman franchise!
Originally posted by BOPRecruit 16
In my opinion, I think the emblem looks better without the yellow background. Kind of made it look ugly and a sign of earlier Batman art. I think the new one is a new change, twist to the original. Isn't change or even a little bit of it, good? Can't do any harm to the reawakening of the Batman franchise!
Forgetting that the title is actually BATMAN BEGINS "thank god they went with that title instead of batman intimadation" man that movie would have sucked with a title like that. 😱 BATMAN BEGINS is a lot better because it IS the beginning story of his and he didn't have the yellow background in the emblem in the beginning so I have no problem with it.I want it to be as close and faithful to the comicbook as possible anyways.
dont worry about batman clips soon they will be on the net, mostly problably hiting on yahoo first.
Mr Parker u should worry yourslef im sure they are going to do a MANBAT movie, cos there is too much marketing around it.
in my land this is called camouflage. when the official trailer come in , we know if we are being fooled or not.
by the way i heard they made bruce almost death and ,he uses a radar thing on his suit.like the new batman cartoon.(well not radar its like a sonic amplification)
Originally posted by Mr Parker
Forgetting that the title is actually BATMAN BEGINS "thank god they went with that title instead of batman intimadation" man that movie would have sucked with a title like that. 😱 BATMAN BEGINS is a lot better because it IS the beginning story of his and he didn't have the yellow background in the emblem in the beginning so I have no problem with it.I want it to be as close and faithful to the comicbook as possible anyways.
i liked the teaser name they gave it earlier, batman intimidation. nice kick ass title but didn't quite hint to the audience that it was about batman's early days as a super hero.
Big difference RJ,BATMAN would only be manbat if they gave him organic wings to fly around on instead of the home made batwings he constructed himself and the ones you saw him fly around on like in BATMAN RETURNS.Hey I hated the first 2 BATMAN movies with a passion but just because I hated those movies I'm not going to refer to them as manbat. 🙄
how not, they are just like the MANX movies and the KLUH movie they sucked really hard, well to be serious i like the hulk enjoyed xman 2 HATE TO THE BONES XMAN , liked SPIDER-MAN, LOVED SPIDER_MAN 2, and enjoyed (at the times i didt read much batman,and i was a kid) BATMAN movie AND LOVED BATMAN RETURNS, i think that was very loayal to the comics style like u the bald guy or not.
of course the best batman adaptation ever is the WB licensed cartoon series.. well at least before the new robin
I don't recall reading anything regarding Stan Lee approving organic webbing. Perhaps you could point me to that article?
What I did read was an article in which Stan Lee suggested a way to introduce mechanical webshooters in Spider-Man 2. Now, why would he suggest the idea, if he approved of the organics and put the matter to rest?
Face it, he wanted mechanical webshooters. I mean why wouldn't he? He made them a part of the character. Spider-Man has had them for 40 years. If he liked the idea of organic webbing, he would have done it 40 years ago.
Originally posted by The Tater
I don't recall reading anything regarding Stan Lee approving organic webbing. Perhaps you could point me to that article?
What I did read was an article in which Stan Lee suggested a way to introduce mechanical webshooters in Spider-Man 2. Now, why would he suggest the idea, if he approved of the organics and put the matter to rest?Face it, he wanted mechanical webshooters. I mean why wouldn't he? He made them a part of the character. Spider-Man has had them for 40 years. If he liked the idea of organic webbing, he would have done it 40 years ago.
Very well said.People like BOP mistakenly believe that Stan approved of them when in fact there was a poster by the name of THE LIZARD over at the shh boards who posted an article 2 years ago that interviewed Stan where he said that he was against the idea of organics when he first heard of them.He also stated in another comicbook magazine I read that he was not thrilled with the new look of the goblin in the movie either.all signs point to Stan not being thrilled with the movie even though he publicly says he was.He only says that because he wants his most famous creation to do well at the box office,cant blame him for that.
anyways,back to the topic at hand which is batman,unlike the first batman film,I am excited about this film because unlike Tim Burton who only cares about his vision and did not care about making a good casting choice and only cast keaton because he was friends with him and felt comfortable working with him,I am excited about batman begins because unlike burton,Nolan and the scipt writers of this movie seem to understand the batman mythos and Nolan cares about making the best choice possible for the role of Batman.Bale is not only a good actor but unlike keaton,he also physically fits the role and this movie will be all about batman instead of having the majority of the film focus on batmans villians like the first two films did where batman was just a supporting character.The first film should have been called THE JOKER because thats who it was all about with batman having only a supporting role.The film crew making this movie seems to recognize the mistakes that Burton and the producers of the batman movies made and they seem to be pushing all the right buttons this time.so hopefully this batman movie will erase the nightmare franchise of the other batman movies.if nothing else,I know I at least wont be pissed about the casting choice for the main role of batman which ruined the whole film for me the first time.Keaton playing batman was like watching AL BUNDY walking around bruce wayne manor,It was laughable because he was so physically wrong for the role.as I have said many times before,good bye pudgy gut, receding hairline, half bald, short runt michael keaton,hello tall, muscular, full set of hair Christain Bale/Bruce wayne. 🙂
The batsuit I have no problem with,but the batmobile is the one thing that upsets me about this movie.Im hoping that since the movie is BATMAN BEGINS that Bruce will have his technicians design and build a better batmobile for him and we will see the one from the first film in a sequel so Im trying not to let the look of the batmobile get on my nerves too much.
Yeah. To date, the batmobile seems to be the most disappointing aspect. The problem with it, for me, is the front. It doesn't look right without a hood covering the front wheels. Of course I don't hate the new batmobile. I like it. The front just looks incomplete.
Since this is a prototype vehicle, and since this is Batman's first year as the Dark Knight, I'm sure we'll get some batmobile changes in Batman 2.
The batsuit I have no problem with.