'Thus far the two identitiesstwo full ages apart though they be can be reconciled in one (long lived) personality'
'one of the two posible solutions to the riddle of glorfindel is that glorfindel of gondolin indeed perished in battle as reported, but was afterwards re-born in middle-earth.'
^^its a mstery my good man 😛
wiki would defeat the balrog you know....
Gandalf- gladriel is just a god-damn old elf...nothing special
elendil- cast down sauron, isildur didnt do anything to sauron
witchking- gamdalf would not fight him in the books, and in the film he loses
sauron- 'sauron was morgoths greatest and mightiest servant' so, ya know he would win 😉
balrog- ok stop with the facination with galadriel
turin- aragorns good, not THAT good
elrond- i dont know why, i just think he would win///😕
gandalf- hes a maia ok, elves are nothing special!
I agree that Galadriel is powerful. I NEVER denied that. I admitted it already way back in page 2 that she's very powerful indeed. But I'm picking on your statement where you were saying that "she doesn't need any weapon to beat the crap out of Aragorn".
No matter how powerful she is, she would still need some weapons and physical abilities to kill Aragorn. Not just a mere power inside her.
Tolkien stated that she was perilous because she has a very deep wisdom and perception to whatever that's going on around her. She was perilous, just like how the Witch King is perilous, just like how Sauron is perilous, but even they have weapons with them.
Toughness and years of existence do not guarantee your victory in fight
I agree to take a quote from the book Beregond exclaimed, "How can he win to the gate if those Hell-Hawks have other weapons than fear!"
This is just and example Gandalf is powerful, Sauron is powerful, the Witch King is powerful, Morgoth is powerful yet they all use weapons. She may be powerful but she's not invulnerable. She might use spells and even if she could block weapons she would still need a weapon. She's not going to win if she doesn't have weapons. This is not the incredible Hulk were talking about. We are talking about a powerful Noldor who isn't supreme. If she was she would have defeated Sauron. I rest my case.
well if you disagree with my 'sauron was morgoths mightiest and greatest servant' line you are disagreeing with a line from the silmarillion
therefore with tolkien
be my guest
You are wrong since in the Silmarillion it said that Gothmog, Melkors General (higher than lieutenant) was Morgoth's mightiest and greatest servant.
Oh and about Arwen Vs. Eowyn (Naked Jello Wrestling)
I really wouldn't care who won as long as the fight was long and everyone could drool over it.
😄
no it did not say that
it always states that sauron was the second
what would be the point in having sauron as a villain in lotr later, you might as well have had gothmog do it
sauron is said to be his mightiest
greatest
'only less evil than melkor in that he served another, before rising again like a great shadow of morgoth'
Hhmm..
Among those of his servants that have names the greatest was that spirit whom the Eldar called Sauron, or Gorthaur the Cruel.
Of old there was Sauron the Maia, whom the Sindar in Beleriand named Gorthaur. In the beginning of Arda Melkor seduced him to his allegiance, and he became the greatest and most trusted of the servants of the Enemy, and the most perilous, for he could assume many forms, and for long if he willed he could still appear noble and beautiful, so as to deceive all but the most wary.
I know there are more but I can't remember where to find them. 😛