Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Originally posted by Apocalypse9
look....there is no bias in either critique..von doom can see that, cause von doom knows something of music.
Hahaha, we know each other. He takes every opportunity to try and ridicule me. Don't think for one second that he was doing it to actually support you. Shame, though. Look, stop trying to deny bias, it's apparant and everyone can see you clearly favour Avenged. Why even bother denying this? There's pages of proof.
Originally posted by Apocalypse9
nowhere in either critique did i indicate who was better at certain things, just exactly what was being played in the music.
Exactly? No, not exactly. How do I know? Because you have admitted that you knew nothing of guitar until some of your guitarist buddies (the talent of which we know nothing of, presumably quite dull if they think of Synyster as a god) told you about it. So with that knowledge, you're listening to a song and deciding what you THINK it all is. Don't trick yourself into thinking it's exactly.
Originally posted by Apocalypse9
look..here's what has been proven
Nothing has been proven. You can show what you THINK all day long, it doesn't prove, it's just your opinion of what's going on. Let's also recognise that.
Originally posted by Apocalypse9
looking at both critiques...given the speed, it is obvious that synyster played much faster rhythms given the same kind of notes(16th, 8th, sextuplets, tripletts). He obviously played the sextuplet arpeggios faster and just as accurately while playing them faster than steve vaio...even zacky was harmonizing with him on the sextuplets at the same speed, making zackyv's arpeggios much faster than steve vaio's.
His name's Steve Vai, not Steve Vaio. I thought you grew up with Vai's music? I don't believe that for a second.
Moreover, why are you now felching both Avenged Sevenfold guitarists by claiming they're better than Steve Vai, faster than Steve Vai (they're just not, at all) and more technical than Steve Vai? This is what DOES get frustrating. The fact that ALL you are basing this on, is what you are DECIDING. You listen to a song and based on what your friends tell you, you make a decision as to what you BELIEVE is being played. That's the frustrating thing. You think it's all supremely accurate when it's not.
Originally posted by Apocalypse9
the range of their arpeggios were the same about 3 octave range both at quick pace, but synyster faster...
Oh, who saw that coming? "But Synyster faster..." Oh of course he is. He's Synyster Gates, right? Pathetic.
Originally posted by Apocalypse9
the blending in of sextuplets and triplets into each other is the same in both steve vaio and synyster, as apparent in his 1ST cd, song To The End of Rapture starting 33 seconds and lasting till 42 seconds and in eternal rest, the beginning in which he shows, in essence, the same note range of steve vai and in i wont see you tonight part 2, the solo, in which synyster shows his technical range of musical melodies extending into all kinds of minor and major keys, similar to steve vai....
Do you even know what you said? "the solo, in which Synyster shows his technical range of musical melodies (bit of a contradiction) extending into all kinds of (aka I don't know) minor and major keys." then capping off with "similar to Steve Vai..." Of course. Regardless of what you say or hear, wrong or right, you HAVE to clarify that your boy is as good as Vai. This is so ridiculous. Let's put this in perspective. The world's most gifted guitarists don't rate Synyster that high, at all. Most probably wouldn't even know him. If you seriously went to a G3 show (Satriani, Vai and a third guest in which they tour) and said "Guess what? Synyster Gates is better than Vai, Satch, Hendrix etc" You would probably get laughed at so loud that the guys on stage would need bigger amps to drown out the decibels of it. I'm not disrespecting your right to LIKE Synyster more, but I am beginning to get less harsh purely because I genuinely do not believe you realise the claims you make.
Originally posted by Apocalypse9
in strength of the world, from 6:40 to about 7:10, he shows the ability to play similar 4 note progressions as well as progressing back down and leaps from low notes to higher notes as steve vai does throughout his solo...this is also present in The Wicked End from 3:00 to 3:28. in the whole end of And All Things Will End, Synyster shows his expertise in speeding up and slowing down the tempo as well as progression from 16notes to sextuplets and back and from triplets to 16notes and back, the same as steve vai....and there you have it, practically everything in vai's solo, synyster can do.....but, may i add that synyster can do it just as well faster as well as just as good slower, as evident in some of the solos i just named. not to mention, although i havent heard steve vai's harmonic leads, i think that it's almost safe to say that synysters and zacky's lead harmonics are better. not to mention, synyster's classical guitar solo on sidewinder. playing a classical guitar is alot different technique-wise than electric and it is almost like beginning all over again when playing the guitar, and being that he has a certain mastery at both, this lead me to believe that he can surpass some of the greats. you dont hear classical guitar solos very often in today's music, especially in these great's solos.
So because two guitarists just so happen to use the odd same technique, they are automatically equal and or better? Where are you getting this? All guitarists have to know certain things, so OBVIOUSLY there are going to be techniques that ALL guitarists have in common. If that was the way to judge then NO guitarists would be better. The fact that Vai does things more precise, more clean and more technically innovative and efficient than most other guitarists is what makes him who he is. Synyster is nowhere close.
I could sit here all day rambling off about the keyboard player from a shit band like The Kaiser Chiefs, he probably does some VERY basic things that Rick Wakeman can do. He's not a better or equal keyboardist is he? No. Because Rick Wakeman has mastered his art. Synyster Gates, at 25 plus, has not. Jimi Hendrix had Eric Clapton (one of the world's best guitarists at the time) in AWE of him, and he was Synyster's age. How many guitar gods of today, and of the past, are in awe of Synyster? Answer is none.
Originally posted by Apocalypse9
there we go, there is my unbias description.....could i make it any clearer where to look for synyster being able to play what steve vai plays? the exact track, the exact time. and i even pointed out where i thought synyster surpassed him playing wise.
You've also pointed out where you think Synyster surpasses Hendrix. I've told you, your opinion isn't valid on this anymore.
Originally posted by Apocalypse9
If you can't hear that synyster has the playing ability through the featured parts i told you to listen, then you obviously dont know what you're listening for. Their solos do differ in alot of ways, but you can tell where it has Steve's influence, but it is so much more than that.I will anxiously be waiting for your proof now.
I know exactly what to listen for, I just don't felch the guy. You're hearing the same song as me. Except you, for some reason, think that everything you hear and decide, is fact according to some guys you know.
You still haven't provided any proof either. Just a page of "This is what I think happens by listening." That's not proof.
Either way, it's apparant you're not understanding me and it's apparant that my common sense is wasted on you. As multiple people throughout this thread have seen. People with actual knowledge, unbiased. All you have is Avenged fans backing you up. So take it how you want it, I'm done with you.
-AC