Silver Surfer vs Thor

Started by Rage.Of.Olympus92 pages
Originally posted by carver9
One thing they said is that he is equal to ares physically.

That's Bendis. What he says doesn't count.

Originally posted by carver9
Another thing that they stated was that Thor PROBABLY could destroy a planet but it would take a LOOOONG time. Then someone asked if Thor could catch a bullet with his teeth and it was stated that he couldnt.

I'm losing faith in my favorite character.

Brevoort said something similar regarding Surfer when it was asked if he could destroy Earth although I don't think he said it would take a long time.

Why does that matter? Brevoort doesn't believe Norrin has legit super speed during combat in the Superman sense; or at the least doesn't use it.

I'm pretty sure he also said Thor would beat Norrin in a fight although I read that some time ago he said he thinks Norrin is slightly more powerful or something.

Anyways, why the hell does it matter what the shit head Brevoort says? People across different boards keep posting his formspring opinion. They don't count as evidence. At all.

He doesn't hold Thor -or at least Thor fans- in a particular good light. His still pissy about the noise he got over JLA/Avengers. Busiek took it in stride though. Props for that.

Although i still think surfer takes a majority, i agree that everything Bendis says is bullshit..

Bendis is Marvel's golden child now. Feel bad for the fans.

Originally posted by Warlord
lol....

ok being physically equal to Ares is contradicted by strength feats through his history no mater ONE writer might thing...

Being able to destroy a planet with his hammer in time makes sence, since a single hammer toss (or even some of them) is not enough to destroy a planet. does that make him weaker? could superman destroy a planet with one or two punches? could gladiator now? we are not in the 70s...
as for the bullet catching teeth thing I don't think it takes anything from the character's powerset

Honestly, I dont think any high herald besides Surfer can destroy a planet but thats just me and given time, I think they could but hell, Storm given time could destroy a planet.

I'm just saying, I take writers words over all and the statements that they have been saying about a lot of high heralds make me think that a lot of them should bow to someone like Surfer.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
That's Bendis. What he says doesn't count.

Brevoort said something similar regarding Surfer when it was asked if he could destroy Earth although I don't think he said it would take a long time.

Why does that matter? Brevoort doesn't believe Norrin has legit super speed during combat in the Superman sense; or at the least doesn't use it.

I'm pretty sure he also said Thor would beat Norrin in a fight although I read that some time ago he said he thinks Norrin is slightly more powerful or something.

Anyways, why the hell does it matter what the shit head Brevoort says? People across different boards keep posting his formspring opinion. They don't count as evidence. At all.

He doesn't hold Thor -or at least Thor fans- in a particular good light. His still pissy about the noise he got over JLA/Avengers. Busiek took it in stride though. Props for that.

Numerous of writers has said things, writen things and made comment about Thor (along with numerous of other high heralds). Surfer is still shining as one of the most powerful being in his Universe. I'm not basing my judgment off of one writer. Look at my past comments on who would win out of Surfer and Thor, I always stated Thor but the writers have complete control of the character and what they say about the characters goes until someone else takes his place.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
Bendis is Marvel's golden child now. Feel bad for the fans.

Because the majority of marvels big wigs are ****ing stupid.

Thor.

its a tough one, over all i give surfer durability, strength, and energy output advantage, but its very slight.

But thor gets a large skill advantage.

Overall surfer wins 6/10 imo

Originally posted by r0nm0n88
its a tough one, over all i give surfer durability, strength, and energy output advantage, but its very slight.

But thor gets a large skill advantage.

Overall surfer wins 6/10 imo

this.

Thor is overall stronger, imo.

Reaction times are prob equal.

Thor

Surfer

Thor

Mjolnir > SS Cosmic Power

Brief Thor vs. Surfer preview:
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=preview&id=8798

Pretty decent strength feat for Norrin to catch a strike from Thor but that was one hell of a head butt from the Odinson. Has anyone ever dented Surfer's skin from a physical blow?

I wonder how much Thor has been weakened by this point. Surfer is probably not that aggressive however based on the art.

Prepare yourself for disappointment bruh.

Yea, Fraction has mastered the art of disappointing me.

From the preview it looks like Odin didn't trust that his own son could put down Thor. Sounds about right.

Hey Quan, isn't it your stance that current Surfer can beat even Odin? It'll be interesting to see whether or not that holds up.

Pretty cool Thor denting his head like granted it didn't seem to bother Surfer much.

looks like a none fight to me...figures

cant they just let the two of them go at it

doesnt seem like the headbutt did anything at all...he look completely fine after odin hits him