Official Spiderman 3 Updates & News thread

Originally posted by doctorstrongbad
If they have more than one villain than that is a bad sign. That crap killed the batman movies.

Thank YOU!!!! someone who agrees with me.

Oh and Fate, I don't think that all those things were the death of the series. I think that if you are looking for all those things and you aren't part of the Oscar judging panel, then the movie is alredy done. I am trying to remember a movie that i didn't like where I thought to myself: "well the movie sucked, but that musical score was just rivoting"

BTW: If you think about it, Riddler and Two-face.....the weak and smart together with the brass and strong... sounds like 2 sides of the same coin...excuse the pun

Originally posted by poncho73
Thank YOU!!!! someone who agrees with me.

Oh and Fate, I don't think that all those things were the death of the series. I think that if you are looking for all those things and you aren't part of the Oscar judging panel, then the movie is alredy done. I am trying to remember a movie that i didn't like where I thought to myself: "well the movie sucked, but that musical score was just rivoting"

BTW: If you think about it, Riddler and Two-face.....the weak and smart together with the brass and strong... sounds like 2 sides of the same coin...excuse the pun

Your welcome. I calls it as I see it.

They need one villain and they should try to develop him. I suggest the Lizard with his labcoat. They can have Harry and even Eddie brock in the background as people. This will lead to debates about the villain is part 4.

Originally posted by poncho73
Thank YOU!!!! someone who agrees with me.

Oh and Fate, I don't think that all those things were the death of the series. I think that if you are looking for all those things and you aren't part of the Oscar judging panel, then the movie is alredy done. I am trying to remember a movie that i didn't like where I thought to myself: "well the movie sucked, but that musical score was just rivoting"

BTW: If you think about it, Riddler and Two-face.....the weak and smart together with the brass and strong... sounds like 2 sides of the same coin...excuse the pun

Well thats why some movies get oscars for Best Sound Editing and such but aren't even possible contenders for Best Picture. Everything coming together makes a good movie, you have to admit that if you were watching a Batman movie and you heard music from a children's toy piano, it would ruin the atmosphere.

Yeah that is a good point, but back to the thread. Its going to be the Lizard. 🙂

Originally posted by NoFate007
Well thats why some movies get oscars for Best Sound Editing and such but aren't even possible contenders for Best Picture. Everything coming together makes a good movie, you have to admit that if you were watching a Batman movie and you heard music from a children's toy piano, it would ruin the atmosphere.

True, but I must say that there have been many movies that have had all the elements that you mentioned and nary a vote. Everything from old horror movies to action adventures, westerns to musicals. The thing is that I don't think it is about the music and the colors. I think it is about the characters. A character that you can identify with, or hate. That is what makes a movie in my mind

Originally posted by poncho73
I think it is about the characters. A character that you can identify with, or hate. That is what makes a movie in my mind

Like that.... quoted myself 😉

The thing is that if you like the villain too much I think that you can lose the basic truth about good story telling. You have to root for one side or the other. The days of white hats vs black hats are over, but if like both sides....you get a spy vs spy comic strip

Yeah that does make sense, a good villain can help a movie. The Villain should never over shadow the hero, see batman part 1.

carnage and venom gonna have to be digitally put in threw computer and green screen, anyone disagree ?

Yes, that is the only way it would make sense.

Originally posted by Icemantx
carnage and venom gonna have to be digitally put in threw computer and green screen, anyone disagree ?

I don't know....even the alien in alien vs predator had to be done with an actor to give it that feel of realism. I think too much green and cgi can ruin a shot

They used an actor for that? I didn't know that.

They'll do Venom the same way as Spider-Man, and Carnage basically the same but with a lot of cg around for all that liquid look.

That makes sense, they can have eddie brock the actor and then switch back from venom to eddie a couple times in the movie.

maybe we can chose the actors could played the role as Eddie Brock and Cletus Kassidy.one thing CGI Venom and CGI Carnage could enters the Spidey 3.

Well not the third movie, but maybe a movie after that.

Sam Raimi on Spider-Man 3 and More
Source: Superhero Hype!
March 6, 2005

Wizard magazine has posted a bit of their Sam Raimi interview from the "Mega Movie" issue and here's a clip:

Raimi talked about the script, potential villains and improvements he wants to make in the look of the characters, particularly the web-slinger. When Spider-Man moves, it will be even cooler next time around.

"We're really trying to shoot for a level of reality that we haven't yet achieved with the 'Spider-Man' films," Raimi said.

In between working on the film, tentatively set to begin filming in January 2006, Raimi is working on the "Spider-Man 2.5" DVD and avoiding horror films, strange for a man who produced "The Grudge" and "Boogeyman."

Also, this article says Spider-Man 2 visual effects supervisor Scott Stokdyk is already working on the third film, while this article mentions that animation supervisor Spencer Cook has joined Sony Imageworks and is working on Spider-Man 3 as well.

And Bruce Campbell tells The Age that he hopes he'll have a juicy role for the third movie:

"I gave Spider-Man his name in the first one, and I defeated Spider-Man in the second one (that snooty usher I played didn't let him into the theatre). In the third, there'd better be something just as amazing," he says.

Sounds good 😉

If he's gonna be a villain than either
a) there will be more than 1 villain
or
b) if its a single villain, the villain would not be Harry, Lizard, or Manwolf (there are already actors to play them).

Who'd he play? Scorpion? Shocker?

Dare I suggest Venom? I know it's statistically impossible at this point in time, but some folks on another board were suggesting he'd make a great Carnage.

Originally posted by Next Venom_girl
If he's gonna be a villain than either
a) there will be more than 1 villain
or
b) if its a single villain, the villain would not be Harry, Lizard, or Manwolf (there are already actors to play them).

Who'd he play? Scorpion? Shocker?

Dare I suggest Venom? I know it's statistically impossible at this point in time, but some folks on another board were suggesting he'd make a great Carnage.

He would make a good Scorpion. 🙂

Originally posted by TheFilmProphet
Sam Raimi on Spider-Man 3 and More
Source: Superhero Hype!
March 6, 2005

Wizard magazine has posted a bit of their Sam Raimi interview from the "Mega Movie" issue and here's a clip:

Raimi talked about the script, potential villains and improvements he wants to make in the look of the characters, particularly the web-slinger. When Spider-Man moves, it will be even cooler next time around.

"We're really trying to shoot for a level of reality that we haven't yet achieved with the 'Spider-Man' films," Raimi said.

In between working on the film, tentatively set to begin filming in January 2006, Raimi is working on the "Spider-Man 2.5" DVD and avoiding horror films, strange for a man who produced "The Grudge" and "Boogeyman."

Also, this article says Spider-Man 2 visual effects supervisor Scott Stokdyk is already working on the third film, while this article mentions that animation supervisor Spencer Cook has joined Sony Imageworks and is working on Spider-Man 3 as well.

And Bruce Campbell tells The Age that he hopes he'll have a juicy role for the third movie:

"I gave Spider-Man his name in the first one, and I defeated Spider-Man in the second one (that snooty usher I played didn't let him into the theatre). In the third, there'd better be something just as amazing," he says.

How many parts in the Spider-Man movies does that guy need to have, anyway?