They decided not to put her in because they thought it got in the way. I watched the special features. But, to tell you the truth from watching the Spider-Man 2 features, the writers didn't seem to really mind. It seems like Stan Lee likes the character Mary jane better than Gwen Stacy. of course they were saying that the movie version of MJ is supposed to be like Mary Jane and Gwen Stacy combined.
Originally posted by wierddreamer213
I heard the big bad for #3 was going to be Hary Osborn as the HobGoblin. with a possiblity of Curt Conors/the Lizard as a bonus.Yes i know Hary Osborn wasn't the hobgoblin in the comics, but i think that they want a diffrent costume/persona for him than greengoblin II
I agree ✅
The villains I want are The Lizard, and Harry as the new Green Goblin.
Originally posted by doctorstrongbad
It enhances strength, agility and endurance. Plus it has independent thought. If the wearer doesn't notice somebody trying to put a bug on them the suit can take action.
There, thats what i was waiting for; You take something like this suit and augment the wearers strength and you get into a whole new argument. If you look at the boost of strength as a constant, then you have a to argue that the boost is directly proporttional to the wearer. In other words: Peter before the spider bite is (a), and Brock (b) would mean that Brock in the suit would be stronger, right? Lets say that the suit is (x). Okay, (a + x) = y, and (b + x) = z, z being the greater with these variables set. Now spider bitten Peter would be like {a(10)[x] x} = 10x{y}. And I'm not really a math fan (but i did watch numbers last week...haha). {NOTE: To the non American members... a show about a math wiz who helps solve crimes}.
What does that mean? 😕
That spider man in his regular suit would have to be stronger than Brock in the bio suit. Ok, lets hear from you Venom fans on that one 😈
BTW, i found a link that states that the suit copied spideys power and gave it to Brock. I disagree with this whole-heartedly, but im fair. Here is the link. Read for yourselves.
[QUOTE=3418116]Originally posted by poncho73
[B]There, thats what i was waiting for; You take something like this suit and augment the wearers strength and you get into a whole new argument. If you look at the boost of strength as a constant, then you have a to argue that the boost is directly proporttional to the wearer. In other words: Peter before the spider bite is (a), and Brock (b) would mean that Brock in the suit would be stronger, right? Lets say that the suit is (x). Okay, (a + x) = y, and (b + x) = z, z being the greater with these variables set. Now spider bitten Peter would be like {a(10)[x] x} = 10x{y}. And I'm not really a math fan (but i did watch numbers last week...haha). {NOTE: To the non American members... a show about a math wiz who helps solve crimes}.
I'm glad that I could help. 🙂
Algebra? 😗
Sevigny Reveals Spider-Man 3 Villain?
Source: SHH!
March 17, 2005
The New York Daily News spoke to Chloë Sevigny (Melinda and Melinda, American Psycho) who says she's trying to land a role in Spider-Man 3.
"I'd love to be in 'Spider-Man 3!'" Sevigny says. "There's a villain in it who's a blond, buxom girl, and I'm trying to get it!
She adds, "That [may] surprise people, since actors are always thought of as their last film or who they were. I think I'll always be drawn to films more difficult to watch, but I don't want to be a snobby cinephile."
Could we see Spidey facing Black Cat in the third film? It's not confirmed, but this is definitely interesting.