Originally posted by dadudemonNot gonna happen, brutha. Ever hear of a guy named Julius Caesar?
I could have sworn I suggested it before, but I don't see it.Here's my suggestion on Mod positions:
Every single Mod position should be up for grabs, once a year. It should be voted on by the members.
We could run a tiered system where only local mods can be promoted to global mods, or something like that.
People should get to "run for Mod" and campaign the members. If enough members like them, then they will get elected.
The tiered system would be in place to ensure the KMC doesn't elect a crappy mod to a global position and then regret it. Of the pool of "local mods" would come the global mods, ensuring that the mod has at least one year of tenure before getting the opportunity to mod, globally.
This would eliminate the “inactive mod” syndrome that happens on boards. This also gives the community to actively participate in KMC by either voting for someone they feel best represents they type of person they would like moderating, or even being a mod. I have seen lots of complaints about modding and the reasons are varied: would this not remove most of those excuses?
If you do not think mods react fast enough to trolls, then run for mod.
If you think a mod is mean or unfair, run for mod or vote for someone else.
If you think a mod is too unfair, run for mod or vote for someone else.
If you think your current mod team is overtaxed at times, run for mod and vow to be active.
If you think a mod is too lenient on enforcing the rules, run for mod or vote for someone else.
I really like this idea and it promotes forum activity and fairness. Some current mods may not like this idea at all due to how many enemies they may have due to simply enforcing the rules and others will posit that it would be difficult to get Raz to make any modding changes, each year, after elections. Both points are valid, of course, but I see far more benefit to this than negatives.