Originally posted by jrodslam
Well, maybe im just not getting it. I understand what the bio is saying and all, but from looking at the comics and what he does, he cant change the air into plasma or whatever like Iceman can actually literally change the air into ice. I notice that its the heat that hes releasing from his hands/body that gets hotter and turns into plasma. Its like if i shoot a flamethrower, am i turning the air into flames? I may be heating up the area around my due to the flames, but i nor the flametrhrower is actually turning the air into flames. Thats my take on it.
Well its the combined waved and air resulting in plasma.. there are scans on panel that mentions somethin about air heating up prior to the blast, i think ive posted 1 of it.. Well the way i understand Iceman powers is involuntary/autonomic deduction of kinetic energy present in the sourrounding/invironment and yes/no far diff. in Havok's powers operate Yes in a way that Alex uses wave of high temp(+kinetic energy in motion) turnin air into plasma and No as in Bobby's involuntary control with kinetic energy in itself turnin air/moisture into Ice, there's
more to it ofcurse but that would be a diff. topic..
Now what im saying about Reds Phermones is that its flamable. Because Havok is going to have a degree of heat and or plasma around him, once in contact with the Phermones will turn into Flames of which arent of Havoks control. Les say if Havok does have the aura/shield around him and the Phermones come in contact with it, his aura will then be flames and thus not a product of his own powers.
But see this is what i think you fail to understand, a space where extreme heat is already presence a product of Alex powers; 1.) air has already/to the point near turned into gas no source for aything to be a flamed by lack of 02, 2.) the heatwave produce is in a way far higher temp the phermones flames if its somehow becomes flammable prior to contact w/ the wave therefor it either gets consumed or just dessipates when the two collides... theres more but this 2 reason should be enough.
I guess. I still say Havok loses if hes within 30 feet of Red.
PS: Id also like to add that its been a pleasure debating with you and others on this. No insulting or such is always appreciated.
I quess we diff. in opinion..lol thats a given.. Reason being stated on past post..
Yeah its nice to be civil...