Originally posted by dber
Not me! For Christ's sake. E! specifically reported he is gay, the article I just quoted hints that he is gay..He has a wife and an adopted kid means nothing at all. From what I read on the net alot of ppl thinks she is his beard afterall, and the article sorta supports this claim. I am not 100% sure he is gay though I have enough reasons to think he is.
He has an adopted kid because his wife can't have any babies.
This is for Dber
A list of Hugh Jackman's filmography and everything else he has done here http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0413168/ Whic should prove he hasn't done any porns.
Here are his words
"We feel that there are so many kids who need adopting. We thought we'd do it after having a couple of our own, but we just changed our mind. He's a mixed-race baby - a child of the Universe."
"I have a wife and a son, but the gay rumors have started. I guess it's a sign that I'm moving up the ladder."
Here is the link http://www.allabouthugh.com/quotes.htm
Is this enough for you Dber?
Sylvester Stallone was also a porn star but IMDB also has not listed his porn movies. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000230/
And what makes you think IMDB will list an actor porn movies? It is Internet movies database, not porn movies database!
Of course he will not admit he is gay, but reports keep pooping up! I am not saying he must be gay, I am just saying I read reports of such and have reasons to believe. Why must I give him benefit of doubt so to say..?
Originally posted by dber
Of course he will not admit he is gay, but reports keep pooping up! I am not saying he must be gay, I am just saying I read reports of such and have reasons to believe. Why must I give him benefit of doubt so to say..?
Thats something called tabloids Dber unfortunately I guess your not smart enough to look at the facts instead. This might be a wild guess but I think no amount of proof I bring to you will convince you since you obiously have something against him for some reason unknown to me. Either way none of thse rumors have anyhing to do with his acting ability or him being considered to play the next James Bond.
Originally posted by TheFilmProphet
Thats something called tabloids Dber unfortunately I guess your not smart enough to look at the facts instead.
Either way none of thse rumors have anyhing to do with his acting ability or him being considered to play the next James Bond.
A man's nose is very important. 😠 😘 😠 😘
-He does not have deep set eyes
-He does not have blue eyes with a twinkle (Fleming description)
-He does not have a straight nose ( instead he has a LONG POINTY NOSE with a DROOPING NASAL TIP) that can poke the enemy's (or Bond girl) eyes out, or from the side, it looks like a clown or pinnochio)
-He does not have good cheekbone(in fact he does not have cheekbone on the left side of his face)
-I prefer someone who is natural ultra cool, coldness (sort of like Bale)(when HJ tries to be cool, he is dull--Van helsing anyone?)
-He speaks with one side of the mouth (have you ever seen Bond
speaks with one side of his mouth, man it sucks! Bond must have some lip muscle malfunction!)
-I prefer someone who is more aristocratic looking
-He has relatively small head compared to his body. It makes him
resembles a lizard, sometimes.
-He is not British. Have all British actors died? Many British actors are
more talented and good looking feature-wise than Jackman, why should
they be discriminated against the overrated Jackman?
-All his non x men films flopped big time and were *shudder* TRASH
-Jackman winning Tony only mean he cannot distinguish between acting and mugging.(A not-so-direct comparison will be Halle Berry winning Oscar means nothing, she still sucks in Catwoman and everything)
-He overdid everything and underdid one thing(Van Hellsing)
Dber ... this obsession of yours is really getting out of hand. Clearly you have something personal against the man - and I can't for the life of me imagine what that is {did he personally offend you or something?} Of course, you're free to have your own views - but for the love of God please calm down!
If I may be frank, it seems to me that you're just buying in to all the rubbish publicity that is eventually "discovered" about all major stars. Just because a supposed "revelation" appears in a magazine or on E! {!} doesn't necessarily mean its true! I mean c'mon - you've yet to quote us one reputable source for all these rumours that you've claimed!
In earlier posts, you bemoaned, and I quote, his "fame whore mentality, the big headedness, the crap movies he made, the huge overratedness, [and] his huge pointed nose". THIS is why you detest him so much? I happen to have met the man in person once, when he kindly signed an autograph for me, and several other people; and he certainly didn't seem big headed or diva-like to me! As for his crap movies, and him being overrated? What about X-Men 1 and 2? The general consensus is that they were fun, enjoyable, and well scripted movies.
And I'm not going to even start a discussion about something as trivial as his nose ...