Originally posted by pr1983
so tell me why the u.s didn't go in ten or twelve years ago?. yes iraq has some sort of freedom, but bush is holding the world to ransom over rebuilding it, why deny france and the other non alliance countries? why did he lie about w.o.m.d?were all happy saddam was deposed, but maybe the price was too high.
the ends NEVER justify the means
ten years ago? Dude, ten years ago America was already having troubles with Iraq.not to mention the other ties america was already involved in. How can you ask why wasnt it done then. the only thing that matters is that it is being done now. Why would would Bush give France non alliance countries? Serisouly tell me why. France has done nothing for America since this all started,except bash America widely and openly. Not just the war,but America in general. American stores get burned down in France, and swastika's get painted on them. Amrican tourists in France get harrased, because of the war. France isnt shit and hasnt done shit.
Bush diddnt lie about weapons of mass destruction. This would be a long argument if i got into it. So i will just say, he diddnt lie. Call it faulty information, call it Sadaam having two months to movie the weapons out of the country,call it whatever you want, but it wasnt a lie. Weapons were found,but not on a scale that the administration thought would be there when they got there. this is totaly another subject though, that can go in circles. that is why i have tried avoiding all potential conversation about W.o.m.d
why hasnt Bush gotten to helping and rebuilding the countries that really need it over their? Well who says he isnt? the war happend and started in Iraq, Baghdad, and the sunni triangle. Of course the areas attacked would be the first to be rebuilt. The rebuilding process will be long and ardeous. Bush has made that known. He doesnt want to lleave untill the country has been rid complety of Alkida, and until the country is able to function.
Bush diddnt lie about weapons of mass destruction. This would be a long argument if i got into it. So i will just say, he diddnt lie. Call it faulty information, call it Sadaam having two months to movie the weapons out of the country,call it whatever you want, but it wasnt a lie. Weapons were found,but not on a scale that the administration thought would be there when they got there. this is totaly another subject though, that can go in circles. that is why i have tried avoiding all potential conversation about W.o.m.d
its paranoid to think he had weapons, and if in the small chance he did, he wouldnt be able to attack america. Also al queda arent in iraq.
Originally posted by pr1983
its paranoid to think he had weapons, and if in the small chance he did, he wouldnt be able to attack america. Also al queda arent in iraq.
why would it be paranoid to think that sadaam had weapons? He had them before, we know this for fact. Alkida isnt in Iraq,but remenants and people affiliated with them are. There are still guerilla terror groups and ragiems acting in that country.
how can you call Bush a facist? Do you know the meaning of the word?
You must get your info of polotics from word of mouth or t.v.
I think the Iraqi people live in more fear now that they ever did under Sadam. Iraq is now a broken country with people dying every single day, its nothing less that a ****ing chaotic warzone and there is no sign that its going to change anytime soon. Bush has destroyed that country and many peoples lives along with it.
Fact:
America found Iraqi jet fighters BURRIED IN THE GROUND, out in the middle of the Iraqi desert.
Now based on that fact....do you REALLY feel confident in the statment that Saddam definitly does NOT have weapons hidden in Iraq?
Hell...look at the hole in the ground Saddam Hussein got pulled out of?
Did you really expect to find him in a hole in the ground?
Originally posted by zombieman
I think the Iraqi people live in more fear now that they ever did under Sadam. Iraq is now a broken country with people dying every single day, its nothing less that a ****ing chaotic warzone and there is no sign that its going to change anytime soon. Bush has destroyed that country and many peoples lives along with it.
Most Iraqi citezens are glad that America came and for what they did, but at the same time fu.cking hate America and are scared because they think America is there to change their culture and religoun. This is why they are scared. They are not scared of the fact that America is trying to rebuild their country and give them access to mediums and freedoms they never had. sorry to inform you, but Iraq was always a broken country, that never had a chance to grow or heal while under the controll of Sadam. Now they do. They have that chance. most of those Iraqi citezens you hear about being killed over there now, are citezens who take fire on the military.
I never said that alkida was in Iraq. There were however affliates and people that heavily funded them. Yes Sadam did have weapons, alot of weapons at one time a few years back. this was a known fact. So what did he do with them all, throw them away? they have found numerous factories in Iraq where weapons were made. Iraq's Airports are about four times the size of an Average America airpot. These Iraq airports span over boarders. There are underground tunnels that lie underneath the entire city of Iraq and that also lead across boarders, and to airports. Sadam had two months notice that America was going to come and look for weapons of mass destruction. It was two months because it was the same two months America spent convincing the U.N to get off their asses and do somthing. Well after two months, the U.N sent in three investtigators. After Sadam refusing to allow them to fully search, the U.N said ok thats all right, we believe you. . Bush decided to go in and do the searching for them. Again, this was after two months of Sadam knowing it was coming.
I never said that alkida was in Iraq. There were however affliates and people that heavily funded them
yeah, people like the american government, should someone invade america?
why? so the entire UN could declare war on Sadam? No the weapons he had were not un usable.
IF saddam had weapons he would have used them, if someone invaded your country u'd use any means to repel them. But he didnt use them, he didnt have any weapons capable of attacking america when bush invaded period.