Originally posted by JohnnyBloom
i don't think they'll make lotr prequels - if they were going to they should've done them first cos the plot isn't so good so people will think the films are failures.
if they'd have done the hobbit first and then the 3 lotr's then maybe it would've worked cos eacho ne would have been betetr than it's previous ones .... but the hobbit has always been a seperate part of the story to the trilogy so .. 😖
star wars wise - i agree that the more they've made, the worse it has become!
They are/ peter jakson is, The Hobbit, but I won't want to see a movie just about bilbo, unless it has thre battle of the last allaince in it, but thats impossible(that happened about 2000 yrs before gollum/smeagol got it by murdering deagol. and bilbo finding it, and bilbo is only 111 yrs old. so 2000
- 111
______
Well more than 13 life times
Originally posted by Aduruthand yet did you forget the battle of the five armies in the hobbit?
They are/ peter jakson is, The Hobbit, but I won't want to see a movie just about bilbo, unless it has thre battle of the last allaince in it, but thats impossible(that happened about 2000 yrs before gollum/smeagol got it by murdering deagol. and bilbo finding it, and bilbo is only 111 yrs old. so 2000
- 111
______
Well more than 13 life times
Well, I have this to say, To be able to make an accurate comparrison of the two, one would have to have read all the books from both sides, watched all the movies from both sides and know every possible thing to know about each side, the only thing every one else can say about it is their own oppinion on the two and oppinions are meaningless in a debate. If they had meaning in a debate then no debate would be able to be won by reason and would end up being won because 10 more people liked Star Wars more than Lord of the Rings. Oppinions in debates only lead to squabling amoung each other.
Originally posted by Will-one Kenobi
Dont get me wrong i love LOTR but SW just outleagues LOTR, believe me nothing can beat Star Wars
Outleagues? Dude..wtf are you talking about?
Lord of the Rings is VASTLY superior. Why? 'Cause Lucas can't write a script for shit. That's why. Nevermind the story of LotR is a little easier to follow.
Wow. I rezzed a year old thread. Kill me now.
Originally posted by office jesus
Lord of the Rings is VASTLY superior. Why? 'Cause Lucas can't write a script for shit. That's why.
Unlike Jackson, Lucas didn't have an already written fictional story in his hands. He had to create his world as he went along with the making of Star Wars. While he may not have particularly designed the make-up and appearance of the characters himself, he did design their personalities, and blessed them with an identity. No doubt, Star Wars would be non-existing had it not been for Lucas. Jackson, however, did not create the LOTR. He only directed it, and placed it into a different light.
Originally posted by office jesus
Outleagues? Dude..wtf are you talking about?Lord of the Rings is VASTLY superior. Why? 'Cause Lucas can't write a script for shit. That's why. Nevermind the story of LotR is a little easier to follow.
Wow. I rezzed a year old thread. Kill me now.
Wow, what a stupidass thing to say. More then half of the diolouge in the movies came directly from the book. And two thirds of the events came from the book. Jackson didn't do even half of the work that GL did.
Originally posted by office jesus
Outleagues? Dude..wtf are you talking about?Lord of the Rings is VASTLY superior. Why? 'Cause Lucas can't write a script for shit. That's why. Nevermind the story of LotR is a little easier to follow.
Wow. I rezzed a year old thread. Kill me now.
do you know that the first time i watched LoTR.. (all three of them) i didn't get it?
i have to watch it twice. and read stuff bout it.